Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Companies That Force Employees To Join Social Networks?

First time accepted submitter rubeon writes "Companies can get a lot of mileage out of social networking services from the likes of Google or Facebook. Chat, document collaboration, and video conferencing using services like Google+ Hangouts or Facebook's Skype are seductive additions to an IT arsenal. But a lot of people have privacy concerns about these services, and there's no shortage of horror stories how these sites track and exploit their users' habits. Would you work for a company that forced its employees to join a social network?"

9 of 364 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Why not, it's just another work tool by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 5, Informative

    Yes, that. Sign up with a new account and compartmentalize your activities appropriately.

    In other words, make your profile private and add only the co-workers that you have to. Discuss only work-related activities. If a co-worker mouths off about the party last night or tries to message you about stuff unrelated to work, don't respond to them online and walk to their cube with a "don't be a dumbass" warning.

    Most importantly, if the above are not already rules in place, then ask that they be made rules. You can say it's for "security" reasons and they'll eat it right up.

    However, I don't have to worry about any of that because I don't social network in private, I don't work for a company with such asinine policies, and I don't do any hanging out with coworkers after work(other than the occasional post-work happy hour with a 2-drink cutoff).

  2. Re:"Facebook's Skype?" by zill · · Score: 5, Informative

    I think you're the one who's asleep. Skype is owned by Microsoft.

  3. Re:Is this really a problem? by icebike · · Score: 4, Informative

    Even Google Execs don't use google +

    http://mashable.com/2011/10/04/google-needs-to-use-google-plus/

    One has to wonder just how serious your employer is about this.

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  4. Re:"Facebook's Skype?" by ThatsMyNick · · Score: 4, Informative

    Facebook uses skype for Video chatting. So you have your regular skype and Facebook's skype.

  5. Re:Why not, it's just another work tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Facebook requires your real name.
    There is also Eric Holder who wants it to be a felony to violate a web sites terms of service.

  6. Re:Why not, it's just another work tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Sign up with a new account and compartmentalize your activities appropriately.

    Unless a network enforces one account per individual.

    Use your work email address to sign up for the work account.

    Use your work address for contact information. It is a business related account after all.

    Don't fill out any personal data fields you don't need to. (Education, Hobbies, Interests, etc)

  7. Re:Mod manipulation by GreatBunzinni, aka Rui Maci by psiclops · · Score: 1, Informative

    I've told ya once, if you would look at my comment history you would see that i'm Australian.

    Judging by the fact you've included me in your list of 'Known puppet accounts' i highly doubt the credibilty of the rest of your list.

    --
    i spent five minutes thinking and all i got was this crappy sig
  8. Re:Why not, it's just another work tool by Surt · · Score: 3, Informative

    Just be ware that if you piss off even a single contact, they can turn you in and get your account nuked. So be sure you don't store anything there that you don't have a backup for.

    --
    "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
  9. Re:Mod manipulation by GreatBunzinni, aka Rui Maci by flimflammer · · Score: 1, Informative

    I think it's hilarious you got modded troll for this post. Just goes to show that they seem to be up to the same tactics they're claiming of other people.