Slashdot Mirror


UK Government To Demand Data On Every Call, Email, and Tweet

judgecorp writes "The UK government is proposing a law that would require phone and Internet companies to store information on all communications, and hand it to the security services when required. The Communications Capabilities Development Programme (CCDP) abandoned by the last government is back on the table, proposed as a means to increase security, and likely to be pushed through before the Olympics in London, according to reports."

42 of 199 comments (clear)

  1. Thank you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Thank you Tory Government for proving you're just as big a bunch of cunts as the others.

    1. Re:Thank you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I wish all the old WWII guys would get in their wheel chairs, walkers, and slippers and hobble down to Parliament and scream:

      Bloody hell! What the fuck! It looks like we wasted our time and our buddies' lives fighting the Germans!

      And then flog all the PMs with their canes.

    2. Re:Thank you by justforgetme · · Score: 2

      The solution is only one:
      Flood them! Create that much data that they simply won't be able to keep it all.
      Only thing that is needed is some background service that logs on to fake
      facebook, email and twitter accounts and corresponds with other (also fake)
      accounts while your laptop is idle.

      Have fun sorting through the yottabytes UK gov...

      --
      -- no sig today
    3. Re:Thank you by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 3, Funny

      reaction from UK government: We need a very advanced AI to sort through all that data. Let's call it Skynet.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    4. Re:Thank you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      How will you know that you've succeeded in overwhelming them?

      How will you stop the bastards from stealing an ever-increasing portion of your income in order to upgrade their surveillance infrastructure to cope with the traffic?

      How will this deter unscrupulous, complicit telecomms vendors from creating increasingly efficient and intrusive forms of spy gear to meet the demand?

      Technological workarounds -- Tor, PGP, and all the rest -- are important, but they're only stopgaps. This needs to be stopped at its source.

      Not to distract you from implementing and deploying your clever flooding plan or anything, but please at least sign the petition too.

    5. Re:Thank you by ocularsinister · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, we invented them during the Boar war

    6. Re:Thank you by asdf7890 · · Score: 2

      At that point they find something in your fake data that could be construed as incriminating in some small way, start an investigation that does nothing more than point out all the fake data you have created, then they can charge your with falsifying evidence, wasting police time, and possibly a few other odds and ends.

    7. Re:Thank you by forkfail · · Score: 2

      They'd all be wrong - there was no such war. We're at war with Eastasia, and we're friends with Eurasia. It's always been this way. You need to be reeducated.

      --
      Check your premises.
    8. Re:Thank you by forkfail · · Score: 2

      Coming next: The National Bandwidth Preservation Act, making it a terrorist crime to use more than X gigs per month, and for intentionally adding noise to the national security logs.

      --
      Check your premises.
    9. Re:Thank you by Blue+Stone · · Score: 2

      George Orwell - Animal Farm. Tells you a great deal about human nature and its response to power. All power corrupts, and unless you have functional reins and limits on those who are given power, it becomes, over time, ever more of a tyranny. Alas.

      --
      Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
    10. Re:Thank you by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 5, Insightful

      10-Step Plan to Cure Cancer in UK and US

      1. Nationalize our communication systems. Telephony, cable TV, and data transmission need to become the people's. If we stopped sending a great deal of our money into the coffers of a few corporations that have so much cash that they continue to expand their control, we would have more money for other things like education. If France can offer the big three communication needs (phone, internet, and television) for a fee roughly 1/3 of what we are paying, we should follow their example.

      2. Immediately institute regulations on the amount of interest that can be charged on credit accounts. Make it the prime rate plus 10-20% - enough to make them money but not so much as to continue to fleece the population.

      3. Regulate severely or nationalize the use of debit cards and force businesses to discount for cash commensurate with the fees that they are paying for using these electronic transfers.

      4. Separate the banks from speculation and traditional banking. By allowing our banks to become addicted to gambling they are no longer serving the public's interest but theirs.

      5. Immediately institute a transaction tax of less than 1% on each transaction. The only effect that people would ever see is when they sell a stock and have to pay this fee out of their proceeds. What this would do is stop the manipulation that major players in the market can perform to bleed money out of the system.

      6. Immediately cease the speculative trading of commodities. As I have often stated if you want to buy oil or grains then you must have the facilities to actually accept delivery of such commodities. If you cannot then you have no business in this market.

      7. Immediately treat all income the same whether from salaries or capital gains: treat everyone the same as far as the taxes in our society are concern. Let them contribute to the social security and medicare systems as well pay their fair share of the burdens we all should share for living in a modern society.

      8. Break up the media conglomerates. There is no reason that all of our news should be filtered through corporations like Disney or Rupert Murdoch's Media Empire.

      9. Treat our trading partners in exactly the way we are treated. Japan can export as many automobiles as we can sell in Japan. China the same. As is stands now all this type of trade is doing is stealing bread off our tables.

      10 Stop the damned revolving door that spins riches to those who worked in government service regulating the same industries that enrich them. Forbid anyone working in a senior position in government from working for a private firm in the same area for a period of time no less than five years and have this same restriction apply to family members.

      http://sideshow.me.uk/sfeb12.htm#1202200100

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    11. Re:Thank you by Dishevel · · Score: 2

      Not bad.
      Problem with number 1 though is that if all of our telecommunications had been run solely by the government we would have less and have it be more expensive than when getting ripped off by private corps.

      Problem with number 3 is the government has no business forcing anyone to give discounts for anything. Sounds good on the face of it but really I want my government fucking shit up less. Power is something government should have very little of.

      Problem with number 10 is I will be god damned if you can prevent me getting a job because my uncle decided to run for office.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    12. Re:Thank you by 19061969 · · Score: 2

      Actually the US had concentration camps when they invaded the Philippines many years before. It could also be argued that the Indian Reservations were an early prototype.

      --
      bang goes my karma... again...
    13. Re:Thank you by muuh-gnu · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > Power is something government should have very little of.

      Power is something both goverment _and_ private conglomerates should have very little off. If you have a too weak goverment, private special interests can grab too much power and become de facto goverments piggybacking on weak official goverments, so you get the same negative results for the population. The key is to cut power everywhere before it starts reaching critical, self-sustaining thresholds. And this only works if the people are powerful enough to cut both the goverment and special interests. It works only with a more direct democracy.

    14. Re:Thank you by hjf · · Score: 3, Informative

      You're describing the situation in Argentina. Our government is doing many of the points you mention (8: war on grupo clarin, 1: nation-wide HDTV and fiber optics internet, 9: forcing importers to export in a 1:1 ratio)

      they also closed down all private retirement funds overnight. it's all state-owned now.

      it's not going so well... a lot of stuff is already missing. brazil (our main trading partner) is getting upset. you need authorization to import anything.

      we're doing some other things too, like compulsive re-issue of all national documents (with biometrics like fingerprint and photo stored online). "electronic" receipts with an copy going in real-time to the tax collecting agency (AFIP), which also has access to all bank accounts...

    15. Re:Thank you by wintywashere · · Score: 2

      And just as stupid. I'm pretty sure real terrorists don't transfer information that is not encrypted to military levels.

      Sure....your low end terrorist wannabees will chat on facebook believing they're safe...but they're the types that will probably find something more interesting to do in a matter of days. At worst, they'll blow off their own fingers accidentally while trying to get it right.

      Meanwhile, uk.gov will force ISPs to up prices to afford recording data for them - recording this data is hideously expensive. Consider the cost of storage on .gov IT projects from their suppliers. It's slightly cheaper than that, but still hellishly expensive....

      And of course...how long will it be before they start requesting this stored data to investigate lesser crimes than terrorism? RIAA?

      --
      Warcraft main?!? Are you serious?
    16. Re:Thank you by cold+fjord · · Score: 2

      Yes, because the UK is famous for its death camps. Oh ... wait ... no it isn't.

      Actually, we invented them during the Boar war

      Actual death camps tend to not leave any survivors. They fill up, kill everybody, and are filled up again to repeat. At least 75% survived the badly run, cruel camps that the British Army ran in the Boer War.

      Africa Imperialism in the dock - the Boer War

      The farms of Boers and Africans were destroyed and the Boer inhabitants of the countryside were rounded up and held in concentration camps.

      The plight of the Boer women and children in these camps became an international outrage - more than 20,000 died in the carelessly run, unhygienic camps.

      The commandos continued their attacks, many of them deep into the Cape Colony, General Jan Smuts leading his forces to within 80km (50 miles) of Cape Town.

      But Kitchener's drastic and brutal methods slowly paid off. The Boers had unsuccessfully sued for peace in March 1901; finally, they accepted the loss of their independence by the Peace of Vereeniging.

      While certain Afrikaners are calling for an apology from the Queen, Sussex University lecturer Dr Saul Dubow, an expert in modern South African history, told BBC News Online that their demands were "specious".

      He said: "Overall, the British were the aggressors, but the primary blame for the deaths in the concentration camps has much more to do with incompetence and lack of medical care than a deliberate attempt to kill.

      That is the difference - death camps are intended to kill the occupants, all of them. (Put the citizens of a town on a train, move them to the death camp, kill them. Put the citizens of another town on the train, move them to the camp, kill them. Repeat.) Concentration camps are meant to hold. That doesn't mean that the circumstances of the concentration camp won't result in many deaths due to privation, cruelty, incompetence, and even calculation. The camps were internationally condemned, and rightly so. But nobody should confuse the British concentration camps in South Africa that 75% survived with the extermination / death camps of the Germans in Poland and other places that killed nearly everyone that entered them to the tune of hundreds of thousands of people each.

      Extermination camps

      The extermination camp Belzec was established in May 1942 and continued to function until August 1943. 600,000 Jews fell victim to the merciless efficiency of the gas chambers at Belzec.

      Sobibor also began its terrible business of mass murder in May 1942. The killings continued through October 1943, when an uprising among the prisoners put and end to the activities of the camp. 250,000 lost their lives in Sobibor’s gas chambers.

      The extermination camp Treblinka was working from July 1942 to November 1943. In August 1943 an uprising destroyed many of the facilities. 900,000 Jews lost their lives in the terribly efficient extermination camp at Treblinka.

      Canadian Boer War veterans look back

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  2. That'll be the scheme opposed by the CURRENT lot? by Rogerborg · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When they were in opposition?

    I guess whether it looks like a good idea or not largely depends on whether you're the one choosing the "preferred bidders". And thinking about your post-political career.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  3. Not a dupe! by dkleinsc · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you're referring to this, it's not in fact a dupe, because the other story is about the Canadians trying to do exactly the same thing as the UK is doing here,

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    1. Re:Not a dupe! by Dupple · · Score: 4, Informative
      --
      Watch those corners
  4. For the sake of the Olympics... by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But I'm afraid they won't remove that law after the Olympics.

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    1. Re:For the sake of the Olympics... by sakdoctor · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The threat of terrorism is a lame excuse for mass surveillance.
      Copyright protection is a lame excuse for mass surveillance.
      Child porn is a lame excuse for mass surveillance.

      The Olympics!? They're not even trying any more.

  5. Re:That'll be the scheme opposed by the CURRENT lo by Grumbleduke · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That's a side effect of two-party/adversarial politics. The party in power only opposes stuff because they see it as their job to. If the current government proposed a law outlawing the mistreatment of kittens Labour would probably find an angle to argue against it. It's because party politics isn't about serving the people any more (if it ever was), it's about beating the other party at the next election, and that means scoring points wherever possible.

    The only thing more depressing than a situation where one side opposes the exact same thing they supported when on the other side of the chamber, is when both sides agree on something, and it gets rushed through without any of the issues being examined.

  6. Re:1984 by CimmerianX · · Score: 5, Funny

    Nope... it starts in England. Didn't you see 'V'?

  7. Re:1984 by DaMattster · · Score: 2

    I always thought Big Brother would start in the US.

    The funny thing is so did I. But, come to think of it the D.C. Comics guys also thought it would start in the U.K. with their V for Vendetta movie. And, in actuality, the whole surveillance camera moves began in London.

  8. Re:1984 by SJHillman · · Score: 2

    Didn't Nineteen Eighty-Four also take place in England? Right in London as I recall.

  9. UK is no different than the rest of the world by ACK!! · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I remember a conversation between my wife a naturalized US citizen and her kin from the UK about security and who cares how much they know as long as you have nothing to hide. It is amazing and sad but a vision into our future. There is a whole series of reports and exposes in the British press a few months ago about how the presence of all the cameras and surveillance tactics have done nothing to make the country any safer. It is basically a giant scam to sell products to the UK government but .... now it is entrenched. Oh well this is how freedom ends right ? With thunderous applause?

    --
    ACK /ak/ interj. 2. [from the comic strip "Bloom County"] An exclamation of surprised disgust, esp. i
    1. Re:UK is no different than the rest of the world by Johann+Lau · · Score: 2

      did you just compare CCTV inside of stores to CCTV in public spaces... seriously?

    2. Re:UK is no different than the rest of the world by julesh · · Score: 4, Interesting

      did you just compare CCTV inside of stores to CCTV in public spaces... seriously?

      You know all those statistics you hear about how many cameras there are in the UK -- originally they said 4.2 million, but more recently that figure has been debunked and replaced with one around 1.5 million -- you do realise they include store cameras, right? In fact, that almost all of them are store cameras.

      There are only around 60,000 public cameras in the UK. The largest deployment is London's (10,000 cameras - similar to the size of the deployment in Chicago, with a population less than a quarter the size of London's). The remaining 50,000 are scattered across around 800 smaller deployments. Most towns don't have any.

      It's harder to find information on US deployments. Chicago, as mentioned, has about 10,000, with the mayor expressing a desire to "put one on every street corner". New York also has a large deployment (3,000 - larger than any in the UK outside of London). Beyond these, figures become scarce. A number of cities published figures for trial installation sizes in the region of 30-50 cameras, but it isn't clear whether these deployments were increased in size beyond this. It seems likely that there are similar numbers of public cameras in the US versus UK (although probably not on a per-capita basis).

  10. Unprecedented level of security by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

    "The project appears to have been resurrected over fears of a terrorist attack at this summer’s Olympic Games in London and security services’ inability to track terrorist’s communication over the internet. The government has already pledged ‘unprecedented levels’ of cyber security for the event."

    And they're right! Once the Anonymous take down their systems, they will be completely secure. A malfunctioning web site has never exploited anyone's browser.

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  11. Re:Inevitable by _8553454222834292266 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Are you serious or just trolling?

    The reason for this is simple. If your child is kidnapped by an insane pedophile, you want the Law Enforcement Officers (LEOs) to use everything they can to find that guy.

    Sure, within the limits of the law and, in the US at least, the Constitution.

    If a record of tweets, blogs, phone calls and IMs helps them do that, it could save your child.

    So could putting cameras in all our houses. Where do we draw the line? I'd rather not live in a police state for the few times it may be convenient.

    Privacy is a great idea, but there are a lot of bad guys out there and we want to keep tabs on them. I think a better solution is to find a government we can trust.

    Good luck with that.

  12. Re:welcome to the NWO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Dude I think the right-wing with their obsession with big-business, concentrating wealth in the hands of a few and assuming people are worthless unless they have money has kind of helped. As for this libertarian bollocks about people fending for themselves, well I wonder how many of you lot work for the government in some manner or other (military, security, university researchers, politics, military contractors - jeez even computer companies probably sell half of their shit to the public sector). Remember throughout the entire of human history since the discovery of agriculture there existed a parasitic ruling class that sucked up the surplus production from the masses in order to build its castles/temples & live a life of luxury. This goes on for thousands of years in different forms - nobility, emperors, bankers.... and when someone suggests a century or so ago 'Hey, lets take some of this wealth and give it back to the people' the supposed freedom-loving right-wing scream "SOCIALISM!!!"

    As for this law, well thats being pushed by a Tory government. The last Labour government were also quite right-wing & like most of your US politicians in the pockets of big business. So if you're remotely bothered about this then perhaps you'll start fighting against the global corps who control your life instead of sounding like an Alex Jones wannabe. You lot are going to keep screaming about socialism until every last fucking right you have has been taken by the rich at which point it'll be too late to do anything at all...

  13. Re:welcome to the NWO by Shark · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Name-calling aside, I think Parent has a point. I'm pretty sure it's the responsibility of the people to keep government power limited and we definitely have been slacking off lately in favour of all the wonderful handouts. We ask that it runs everything then we complain that it does so for its own sake rather than ours. We kid ourselves if we think government any less selfish than those evil corporations. We're too lazy to vote with our dollar against the latter and too lazy to change the former and keep it in check. Bottom line is that we get what we deserve.

    I see this as a natural reaction: The Internet has caused a little surge of activism lately and we can very well see how that has the government running scared.

    --
    Mind the frickin' laser...
  14. Re:Inevitable by Znork · · Score: 2

    So, what's your plan in the much more likely event that the LEO sticks your child in the same cell as that psycho because they consider him a terrorist after reading his tweets, blogs and IM's?

    See, if it's just the insane guy you have a chance. If it's the government, you're going to join the suspect list for complaining. Heck, we've already heard here that you're of the opinion that doing whatever it takes to get him back is ok, so maybe you're planning violence.

  15. Re:Inevitable by Shark · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think a better solution is to find a government we can trust.

    The only answer to that is: A government that doesn't have such powers. Sorry but you can't have your cake and eat it... You either accept that your rights are in someone else's hands to be abused, or yours to defend. The middle ground situation you're looking for is never stable enough to last more than a generation, if that.

    --
    Mind the frickin' laser...
  16. decentralized communication needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Governments will never stop seeking more and more power over individuals. Corporations will always serve the will of their plutocrat masters.

    Anonymity is the ONLY effective defense against power, that is why powerful interests do everything they can to eliminate it.

    "The People" who aren't in either of those camps need a means of anonymous, distributed, communication that is outside of anyone's control.

    Imagine a box anyone with a little electrical knowledge can wire into a hot outlet. Or a solar powered "wifi grenade" that can be thrown on a roof to make a node in the mesh and last until someone finds it. Set these up to connect to existing hotspots to piggyback on the "plutocrat" internet. Configure them to be low noise enough that they are difficult to distinguish from regular traffic. Add a little onboard storage and files can be "cloud stored" and impossible to remove.

    We are coming to a crossroads. The future will be either the one of the boot stomping on the face like 1984, or one where the evil men who seek power are constantly frustrated by freedom loving individuals who have a greater understanding of technology.

  17. time to start encrypting everything by Khashishi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    encrypt your phone calls, email, everything

    1. Re:time to start encrypting everything by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 3, Informative

      jfij2oijf93j(*J#*(@(#*&$@#*(&JIEWJFiofjeoiwjifojio

      The prevalence of *, (, o, i, and j indicate that you are right handed. The proximity of £, @, and #' indicate and American keyboard setup.

      Either way, this isn't encrypted text, and can be rejected as worthy of analysis.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  18. If they snoop the Queen, is it treason? by davecb · · Score: 2

    ... or perhaps just mutiny?

    --
    davecb@spamcop.net
  19. Re:1984 by Idimmu+Xul · · Score: 3, Funny

    We tried that last year.. everyone just nicked sportswear from Soccer World :(

    --
    The problem with slashdot is that most of its users were bullied and stuffed into lockers as kids!
  20. Re:The UK is dead. by 0123456 · · Score: 2

    why are we so hell-bent on destroying all the progress we made over the past 50 or so years?

    'We' aren't. Governments are.

    Fortunately most of them are bankrupt and can't sustain a war against their people for long. The EU is collapsing, the USA is reliant on China buying their bonds to keep them afloat, and most Western nations have only sustained their economy over the last decade by printing money to fund non-jobs.

    The great thing about economics is that you can only ignore reality for so long before it comes back and bites you.

  21. I got a better idea by 3seas · · Score: 2

    how about we make all communications of public funded government, public....