Slashdot Mirror


Chinese Court Orders Ban On Apple's iPad

zacharye writes "A lawyer representing Proview International on Monday announced that the Intermediate People's Court in Huizhou, a city in southern China, ruled that distributors should stop selling iPads in China. From the article: 'The ruling, which was also reported widely in China's state media, may not have a far-reaching effect. In its battle with Apple, Proview is utilizing lawsuits in several places and also requesting commercial authorities in 40 cities to block iPad sales. Apple Inc. said in a statement Monday that its case is still pending in mainland China. The company has appealed to Guangdong's High Court against an earlier ruling in Proview's favor.'"

5 of 190 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    That's all well and good, except for the fact that they paid for the trade mark.

  2. Re:Good by msobkow · · Score: 5, Informative

    And the company that OWNS the trademark denies that the company that SOLD it had the right to do so.

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
  3. Re:Good by andydread · · Score: 4, Informative

    They paid from the trademark from the Taiwan affiliate. The mainland China Corporate office has denied that apple can use that trademark in mainland China and has denied permission for the Taiwan affiliate to sell that trademark for use in Mainland China. Keep spouting Apple's talking points there without telling the whole story though carry on.

  4. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Typically when you buy worldwide rights, it applies to the entire world, no?

    http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/02/15/us-apple-proview-idUSTRE81E0BE20120215

    I would think if Proview has an issue, then they need to speak to whoever was claiming to own the worldwide rights to the trademark, rather than Apple. Claiming they were developing a 'similar' technology in 2000 with absolutely nothing to show for the last 12 years is a stretch in the best of cases, where their current financial situation would more likely imply that they are simply trolling trying to stay afloat given they are already going under.

    By all means though, post without telling the whole story...

  5. Re:Deja Vu by sribe · · Score: 4, Informative

    Thats the second time you have said that, got any links to that "evidence", as its the first time I have heard it....

    Oh, come, on. It's been reported all over the place--maybe you're just tuning out anything that contradicts your "evil Apple" preconceptions. 30 seconds with google turns up plenty of references. Here's one.