Slashdot Mirror


Transparency Grenade Collects and Leaks Sensitive Data

Zothecula writes "If you thought WikiLeaks was a disruptive idea, the transparency grenade is going to blow you away. This tiny bit of hardware hidden under the shell shaped like a classic Soviet F1 hand grenade allows you to leak information from anywhere just by pulling a pin. The device is essentially a small computer with a powerful wireless antenna and a microphone. Following 'detonation,' the grenade intercepts local network traffic and captures audio data, then makes the information immediately available online."

24 of 103 comments (clear)

  1. It's a marketing bug by istartedi · · Score: 2, Funny

    They put some bugging hardware in a cool looking case, they're probably selling it (I tuned out after looking at the pictures) and somehow they got on Slashdot. What I want to know is, where do I purchase the marketing grenade? They're not telling. That's where the real money is.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    1. Re:It's a marketing bug by definate · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's not marketing, like you'd think. If you RTFA...

      "The Transparency Grenade was created in January 2012 by Julian Oliver for the Studio Weise7 exhibition at Labor 8, Haus der Kulturen der Welt, Berlin, curated by Transmediale 2012 Director, Kristoffer Gansing."

      And on their webpage you get more information...

      "The Studio Weise7 exhibition brings together a series of works that frame a volatile interrogation of our increased dependence on machines, computer networks, databases and digital automation. The works consist of curious devices, software and circuitry, each representing a unique, critical engagement with the challenges of our "techno-political condition". In doing so, they serve as triggers for discourse, code for study and tools for deployment."

      So this device is them attempting to market an idea, and their art, rather than a product.

      --
      This is my footer. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    2. Re:It's a marketing bug by TubeSteak · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well the problem is that you tuned out after looking at the pictures.
      It was made for an art exhibit in Germany and the creator is working on making an app for Android phones that will mimic the basic functionality.

      The open sourcing and commoditization of hardware is bringing us the kind of technology that once required the R&D budget of a large company or the CIA..

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    3. Re:It's a marketing bug by PatPending · · Score: 2

      So this device is them attempting to market an idea, and their art, rather than a product.

      Still, we must not allow a Transparency Grenade gap!

      --
      What one fool can do, another can. (Ancient Simian Proverb)
    4. Re:It's a marketing bug by Fned · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ahh, so because it's shaped like a grenade it constitutes art

      No, it's art because it was made by hand, there's only one of them, and it's on display at a fucking art exhibition.

    5. Re:It's a marketing bug by definate · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Since you obviously want me to respond to your point, I will.

      The op said...

      "...they're probably selling it...where do I purchase the marketing grenade? They're not telling. That's where the real money is."

      So, no. It's not like like the OP thinks. He believes this is a product, that some company is selling. It isn't.

      More so...

      "So what you're saying is that they are marketing something and now Slashdot is helping them."

      This only holds if you consider anything where someone attempts to communicate anything to anyone else, as marketing. That could be correct in a technical definition of the term, however it would be wrong in the casual definition of the term which is synonymous with "commercial advertising".

      If you think "Yes, this advertises the gallery/artist/idea", then you'd be correct, and every single piece of art in history, has been "marketing". Additionally, every single academic paper, would also be "marketing".

      --
      This is my footer. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    6. Re:It's a marketing bug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Art is a funny thing. Twenty foot tall pieces of canvas with a single black line down the middle have sold for thousands of dollars. I think the people who would buy such a thing are idiots, but no more so than you given your inability to even grasp the concept to begin with.

  2. johnny appleseed by Phoenix666 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Combine this with intel's solar powered chips and you can spread them like johnny appleseed where they're needed. Or, as a variation, set them up as fileservers with copies of music, movie, and media files and seed them everywhere until the *IAA's give up the ghost for good.

    --
    Do what you can, with what you have, where you are.
  3. Finally, a reason to shoot leakers by zAPPzAPP · · Score: 2

    "He had a weapon in his hand."

    You are making it to easy for them.

  4. Why the HELL does it look like a grenade? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    To actually be useful, it should like like a cell phone, a pad of post-it notes, a small notebook, a random piece of garbage like a crumpled up paper or something similarly inconspicuous. Making it look like a grenade is just dumb.

    1. Re:Why the HELL does it look like a grenade? by AdamWill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because it's an art project. It's not meant to be a production device.

  5. Re:Just what the world needed... by Hatta · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The powerful already have all the tools they need to eliminate your privacy. This is a tool for us to eliminate their privacy.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  6. Yes, this WILL blow you away by reilwin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It will cause you to quite literally be blown away by law enforcement when they see you holding what appears to be a grenade.

    Joking aside, I fail to see how this is supposed to be comparable to wikileaks. While wikileaks is undeniably intended to help whistleblowers, this is a tool suitable for multiple (not not necessarily ethical) purposes. Mind, I don't see too many corporate espionage agents actually using this as is...

  7. Not like Wikileaks, not disruptive by guspasho · · Score: 3, Funny

    As far as I can tell this idea is neither disruptive nor in any way similar to Wikileaks. Am I missing something?

    1. Re:Not like Wikileaks, not disruptive by bws111 · · Score: 2

      Yes, yes, you are missing something. Never before has anyone conceived of a device to surreptitiously listen in on someone and broadcast that to a remote location. I mean, it's not like that is in every spy movie, Mission Impossible episode, and cop show ever created. And even more amazing, it lets you listen ON THE INTERNET! Can you imaging that?? Sound on the internet? How revolutionary. But the main feature you are missing is the fact that it is so easy to hide. No more trying to squeeze all those electronics into something conspicuous like a thumbtack. This looks like a GRENADE, so it can easily be hidden amongst all the other Soviet grenades that commonly are in executive offices and conference rooms.

  8. catch by slashmydots · · Score: 2

    Here's the asterisk that's missing from the end:
    * not if it's on an AT&T data connection though, then it won't find a signal in any respectable amount of time :-P

  9. Re:Holy shit by f3rret · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's. Art.

    --
    Admit nothing. Deny Everything. Make Counter-accusations.
  10. Re:Holy shit by PlatyPaul · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Just because it's art does not mean that it isn't stupid.

    Come to think of it, I need that printed up on a shirt....

    --
    Misery loves company. Online misery loves unsuspecting random strangers.
  11. Sounds patently irresponsible, frankly by Gimbal · · Score: 2

    I can understand the fascination with "covert" leaks - there might appear to be a certain emotionally sensational quality about it, to the uninvolved and/or uninformed observer. When someone takes the security of a country, a governmental branch, or even a private enterprise as if it was "fair game" to breach the security of which for their own personal political statement, then it becomes dangerous. Considering so far as such statements would ultimately backfire, can we not learn to be more responsible as citizens and as people?

    If there's a matter of transparency one wishes for, one really should "talk it out", and talk it out patiently, before so much as attempting to open up, to the public, what is not one's own to open up, in the first place - and furthermore, before endangering anyone whom the information would affect directly and personally. If one talks it out, beforehand, one really might come to recognize one's own naivete, before having us all pay a cost for one's own little wish to make a political statement.

    I cannot argue to dreams and wishes, I can only argue to facts. Private information is private information. That, itself, should be fact enough.

  12. Re:Just what the world needed... by firefrei · · Score: 2

    The powerful already have all the tools they need to eliminate your privacy. This is a tool for us to eliminate their privacy.

    Why is it always an "us" vs. "them" scenario? What happens if I, a lowly geek, eventually through career progression and knowing the right people, finds myself in a position of corporate power? Will you come after me too?

    I'm aware of the (correctly-quoted) saying "Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely", but just going after those in power just because they ARE in power seems foolish. Not everyone in power is a dick. I admit the list of those who aren't is extraordinary low but still...

    --
    I remember when Linux was good... too...
  13. Re:Weapon of choice of Capt. Obvious by PPH · · Score: 2

    Actually, I think their point was that they had or were developing a similar package which would use a smartphone instead of a grenade.

    There are places (where it might be interesting to make recordings) that won't allow phones into certain meetings. DoD classified stuff is obvious. But I've worked at companies where some shifty stuff was going on. And anything that looked like it might record was looked on with suspicion*.

    *I was in such a meeting once. When I walked in, my boss spied my MP3 player (just a player) and asked me to leave it at my desk. "No recording devices allowed." So I dropped it off, came back and laid my PDA on the table in plain sight (it can record). I didn't actually record anything. But I just wanted to see if he was really dumb as a rock. He is.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  14. Re:Just what the world needed... by mister_playboy · · Score: 2

    Why is it always an "us" vs. "them" scenario?

    This sort of rhetoric is necessary because Americans seem very reluctant to acknowledge the dynamic that is having an increasingly profound impact on their lives: the income disparity between a small group of individuals and everyone else. It's a combination of political correctness and a delusion that aristocracy is a "European" thing that can't happen here.

    Your situation is hypothetical, but the transformation of this nation into a banana republic of haves and have nots is all too real.

    “There’s class warfare, all right. But it’s my class, the rich class, that’s making war, and we’re winning.” -- Warren Buffett

    --
    Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
  15. Re:Many uses for this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    The grenade would report back absolutely no information.

  16. Re:I already have this on my iPhone 4S by icebraining · · Score: 2

    Did you miss the part where it records network traffic and streams it all to the 'net?