Slashdot Mirror


Have Bad Cars Gone Extinct?

Hugh Pickens writes "AP reports that global competition is squeezing lemons out of the market and forcing automakers to improve the quality and reliability of their vehicles. With few exceptions, cars are so close on reliability that it's getting harder for companies to charge a premium. 'We don't have total clunkers like we used to,' says Dave Sargent, automotive vice president with J.D. Power. In 1998, J.D. Power and Associates found an industry average of 278 problems per 100 vehicles, but this year, the number fell to 132. In 1998, the most reliable car had 92 problems per 100 vehicles, while the least reliable had 517, a gap of 425. This year the gap closed to 284 problems. It wasn't always like this. In the 1990s, Honda and Toyota dominated in quality, especially in the key American market for small and midsize cars. Around 2006, General Motors, Ford, and Chrysler were heading into financial trouble and shifted research dollars from trucks to cars after years of neglect and spent more on engineering and parts to close the gap. Meanwhile Toyota's reputation was tarnished by a series of safety recalls, and Honda played conservative with new models that looked similar to the old ones. Now it's 'very hard to find products that aren't good anymore,' says Jeremy Anwyl, CEO of the Edmunds.com automotive website. 'In safety, performance and quality, the differences just don't have material impact.'"

16 of 672 comments (clear)

  1. ask a mechanic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    if bad cars have gone extinct. take a seat, it will be a while before he's done laughing.

    1. Re:ask a mechanic by shadowrat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No car needs more than that if you are only driving them for 2 years. I don't know how far you are driving, but if you don't care about the longevity of a car, you could probably drive most new cars to 40 or 50k miles without ever getting an oil change.

    2. Re:ask a mechanic by swalve · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What you are missing is the idea that a car can go 2 years or 3.5 years without ANYTHING breaking is downright miraculous, compared to other machines and other times in history. Especially when the numbers start to play out that it is no longer an exception to get a good one (remembering that whole cars built on monday or friday thing), but the rule, and from many different manufacturers. For the longest time, Honda gained the reputation for quality because they were dead simple. Now, it seems, even the complicated cars go forever.

    3. Re:ask a mechanic by axlr8or · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I still drive a Fiero. 85 gt. It's had its share of maintenance probz but i'll tell you what. same motor, I beat the hell out of it every time I drive it. Starts even on the coldest mornings. ALL CARS are junk. If you don't believe that then the automaker of your choice has you fooled. And besides, if you are ditching a car before its even payed off you are losing. Period.

    4. Re:ask a mechanic by GameboyRMH · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Holy shit what's wrong with you!? And I thought buying a new car once every 5 years was bad...

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    5. Re:ask a mechanic by MightyYar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm afraid it was way too late for them to keep me as a customer.

      I'd like to point out that brand loyalty can be just as naive as nationalism in a buying decision. Maytag was considered unsurpassed in quality for most of it's existence, but if you bought one in the ten year period of 1996-2006, you'd just as likely have a pile of junk. Toyota hasn't fallen as far as Maytag, but there's no sense in pretending that they are the pinnacle of reliability anymore (I say this as the owner of two Toyotas, so I'm not hating).

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    6. Re:ask a mechanic by stewbacca · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ALL CARS are junk, says the guy with one of the biggest pieces of shit cars every manufactured.

  2. News to me by danbert8 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The author has obviously not driven a GM vehicle lately. Let me count the problems with my two year old Pontiac...

    --
    Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
    1. Re:News to me by danbert8 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You are correct, it is two years old and not a new car. However, if you are only basing reliability on one year or whatever you define as a new car period then you sir (and the author) are fools.

      Also, reading the article it becomes apparent that what he is actually referring to is that new models are more reliable. I don't see any mention of a brand new Chevy Malibu (the same car as my G6) being reliable. Maybe now the new designs are coming out that are built worth a damn.

      --
      Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
    2. Re:News to me by vlm · · Score: 5, Insightful

      None of the GM divisions have been tops for initial quality

      With the exception of the now defunct Saturn. I'm convinced they gave Saturn the axe because it made all the other divisions look bad. Love my indestructible Saturn commuter car...

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    3. Re:News to me by bshensky · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You're clearly not from the Motor City. Badges have little meaning - nearly no meaning, really - as it's the *platforms* that are designed by the automakers, with the badges shared among them.

      Pontiac was put to pasture because its offerings were redundant to those from Chevy, Buick and Saturn. Even then, Saturn got the axe for the same reason. The end result was a healthier portfolio of platforms upon which various GM makes could be engineered, tuned and packaged.

      This, however, is the insight few folks realize: The automakers each have a cache of core engineers with talent and capabilities that vary wildly. The executives move their most talented engineers to the platforms that need success most, and their lesser engineers to the platforms that need it least. So, Ford F-150 and Chrysler minivan engineers are the best of their respective companies for a time, and fleet car platforms get the chaff. When the fleet car platforms suffer to the degree they need triage (Chrysler 200, Dodge Durango, Ford Focus), the best engineers are shifted here to perform some one-off miracles.

      From here, it sounds like the trim engineers assigned to the aging GMs you had were running in "maintenance" or "cost reduction" mode. Shame for them to lose you, as it's clear to me the star teams were on call for the recent launch of the Cruze and Sonic.

      Hard as it was for GM to eliminate and consolidate (trust me, I know, I lived off Pontiac's teat for the last decade), it was the right thing to do.

      The new farts know what the old farts don't: Follow the star engineers' platforms for great reliability success!

      --
      Makin' money, makin' friends, makin' whoopee and wearin' Depends
  3. Re:Is this a rule? by Joce640k · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Go to any taxi rank in Germany (where almost all taxis are Mercedes). You won't have any trouble at all finding one with over 500,000 km on the clock.

    --
    No sig today...
  4. You young people don't remember the horrors by Average_Joe_Sixpack · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Of being stranded on the side of I95 in the dead of summer with steam pouring out of the hood of a behemoth Ford.

  5. Re:Wait, what? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    TFA appears to emphasize the shrinking delta between the best and the worst(as well as the gradual decline of the average number of problems per 100 vehicles). 92 issues per 100 cars certainly isn't something you'd want out of your satellites; but for fairly modest definitions of 'problem' isn't too terribly surprising for complex mechanical devices, relatively cheap, in the hands of unskilled users.

    The big news is not that the absolute reliability of the best-in-class has changed that much, though it has improved a touch; but that the average quality of the junk has increased quite sharply, narrowing the reliability gap considerably.

  6. Don't Confuse Initial Quality with Reliability by mixed_signal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There's a big difference between "initial quality" reports and long term (5, 10, 15 year) reliability, though there is probably some correlation due to overall manufacturing control at the factory. Initial quality tells you if something was built correctly, for the most part. Long term reliability has more to do with the design and specifications of the car and its components. You can have a cheap car (or camera, or toy, etc.) that works fine out of the box and breaks in a short time due to cheap materials. Or you could have one built of high quality materials with fine tolerances that lasts effectively forever.

  7. Re:The Biggest Loss by digitalsolo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sorry, this is crap. If you choose not to learn how to work on a modern car, that's your own issue.

    I'm not a mechanic by trade (though, admittedly I grew up with a family who races professionally) but I will take a modern car to work on over something 10+ years old any day. In fact, one of my "toy" cars is a 1988 Mazda. It's had an entire drivetrain from a 2001 GM product swapped into it, and that has in turn had even more modern electronic controls put into it.

    My 2007 Infiniti is just as easy to work on as my 1987 Renault GTA was, and it's a damn sight easier to keep running well. Obviously electric/hybrid cars require a different skill set from ICE cars, but that's simply a matter of learning what to do.

    BTW, many of the freelance mechanics I know are much more skilled than the average monkey at a dealership, the dealership simply has more books and specialized tools. Those are all available to the shade tree guys too, just call your Mac/Snap-On dealer.

    I'm confused by this fear of technology on... Slashdot. Really guys? Come on.

    --
    Just another ignorant American.