Slashdot Mirror


Secret UK Network Hunts GPS Jammers

garymortimer writes "A secret network of 20 roadside listening stations across the UK has confirmed that criminals are attempting to jam GPS signals on a regular basis. From the article: 'Government-funded trials involving the police have revealed more than a hundred incidents of GPS jammer use in the UK. The Sentinel project, which has been running since January 2011, was designed to measure GPS jamming on UK roads. The project, run by GPS-tracking company Chronos Technology, picked up the illegal jamming incidents via four GPS sensors in trials lasting from two to six months per location.'"

7 of 228 comments (clear)

  1. Re:at the risk of sounding stupid.. by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Redirect a GPS equipped armored car to your secret criminal location and land it safely. Just like the Iranians did with the drone.

    In old movies, criminals used fake "Detour" signs to re-route trucks carrying loot. Criminals are just getting high-tech savvy.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  2. Re:Is it illegal yet? by slimjim8094 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I can't speak for the UK, but it is absolutely illegal in the US. I'd go as far as say it's one of the most illegal things you could do with radio, in that it's about the most egregious use of deliberate "harmful interference" around. It would be illegal if they were trying to block Joe Frank's Tree Service walkie-talkies, but GPS is very highly used, very highly depended on, and not only governmental but military. Anybody doing serious GPS jamming effective over a few miles would be found in an hour - probably less. Seriously, the military invented it to know where they were. Planes use it to land (not without fallbacks...). I wouldn't screw around with it if I were trying to stay quiet, because you'll get a lot of guys that are a lot smarter and a lot more serious than the local PD on your tail in a hurry.

    --
    I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
  3. Re:OT: What's with all the hyperbol summaries late by slimjim8094 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Paranoid much?

    In any case, the entire reason we have the FCC is precisely because you don't get to decide how other people use radio. You're not allowed to jam GPS because you don't like it. That would be like shooting down a plane because it flew over your house.

    Sure, if you wanted to jam GPS for a 20 foot radius, people probably won't notice. But GPS is a global system of great importance - planes can use it to navigate, not to mention millions of people just trying to make it to their relatives' houses, or find the nearest pizza place. Not to mention, it's military. They'd have something to say about your "I'll block GPS!" plan, I'm sure.

    But let's accept the premise. Let's say for the benefit of the doubt that you didn't know the sorts of things GPS is actually used for. Can I jam the police frequency so they can't operate near my house? "Fuck da police" doesn't count. How about the fire department? ATC communications? Hospital pagers? WiFi? The local radio station while it's airing Rush Limbaugh, because I don't like him?

    Most radio is licensed, including GPS. You have to abide by rules to use a licensed service, but it grants you protection from interference. You as an individual don't get to decide that this particular licensed service can just be interfered with because it pisses you off.

    --
    I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
  4. Re:at the risk of sounding stupid.. by MichaelSmith · · Score: 5, Insightful

    evasion of company-vehicle or covert tracking

    Yeah there is a scandal here in Australia at the moment with a trucking company disabling speed limiters. Corrupting GPS trace information would be the other half of the picture.

  5. Re:at the risk of sounding stupid.. by billcopc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Depends on your definition of "criminal".

    GPS navigation is generally a good thing. GPS tracking is a slippery thing, seen by some as an invasion of privacy. The vehicle owner should be entitled to know where their property is, but it is none of their business where I go and what I do during the day. Insurance companies would love to hike premiums based on where you park, where you eat, how many mistresses you entertain, or those brief stops in the seedy part of town.

    I cannot speak for the UK, but in some parts of the world, you can get fined for speeding in a rental vehicle - by the rental company, not the police! I would gladly jam a device used to defraud me in such fashion. Traffic management is a police matter, not a private one.

    On one hand, GPS tracking can help against theft, or at least facilitate recovery. On the other hand, it opens up a wealth of possibilities for abuse. The dilemma is in deciding if the pros outweigh the cons (no pun intended).

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
  6. Re:OT: What's with all the hyperbol summaries late by Feefers · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Besides we don't need GPS, we can use the vast CCTV network to track you far better.

  7. Re:Not that much of a stretch, really... by Electricity+Likes+Me · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Criminals" aren't attempting anything.

    Random kids who wonder about signal jamming are looking up the plans online and testing out just how easy it is to do.