Slashdot Mirror


A Small Glimmer of Hope For Faster-Than-Light Neutrinos

sciencehabit writes "The CERN particle physics laboratory in Geneva has confirmed Wednesday's report that a loose fiber-optic cable may be behind measurements that seemed to show neutrinos outpacing the speed of light. But the lab also says another glitch could have caused the experiment to underestimate the particles' speed. The other effect concerns an oscillator that gives its readings time stamps synchronized to GPS signals. Researchers think correcting for an error in this device would actually increase the anomaly in neutrino velocity, making the particles even speedier than the earlier measurements seemed to show."

11 of 183 comments (clear)

  1. Last Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, if FTL works, it will have gone back in time to be sooner than that.

  2. Re:Poor Quality Assurance does not boost confidenc by ArcherB · · Score: 5, Funny

    I should also add that I will be conducting my own experiments in my basement with a neutrino cannon, flashlight and stop watch. If I see anything interesting, I'll post the results here.

    If you want anything done right, you have to do it yourself!

    --
    There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
  3. The new equation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    E = MC^2 * (1 + ($M - $P ) / L ) + ( Ic/Ir )

    Where:

    E = Energy
    M = Mass
    C = Speed of light
    M = Monster cable
    P = PC Warehouse cable
    L = Length of cable
    Ic = Interval between calibration scheduled
    Ir = Interval calibration required

  4. Re:Poor Quality Assurance does not boost confidenc by TheCouchPotatoFamine · · Score: 4, Funny

    sarcasm meter must be on the fritz again - all i pick up is asshole.

    --
    CS majors know the time/space tradeoff, but they never get taught the 3rd, crucial, tradeoff of the set: comprehension!
  5. Re:A good side effect of all this by PatPending · · Score: 4, Funny

    We might even advance the whole science of measurement.

    And metrology, too!

    --
    What one fool can do, another can. (Ancient Simian Proverb)
  6. Re:Poor Quality Assurance does not boost confidenc by electron+sponge · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just reverse the tachyon field on your deflector array, and then inject a stream of polarons into the positronic matrix.

    Jeez, do I have to do everything around here?

  7. Re:Poor Quality Assurance does not boost confidenc by MagusSlurpy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Only on Slashdot do you find scientists reading forums from their labs at 1AM on Saturday mornings while waiting for experiments to finish up.

    *Looks over at refluxing reaction vessel*

    Dammit.

    --
    My sister opened a computer store in Hawaii. She sells C shells by the seashore.
  8. Re:Poor Quality Assurance does not boost confidenc by ArcherB · · Score: 4, Funny

    Quoting ArcherB:

        > "I should also add that I will be conducting

        > my own experiments in my basement with a neutrino cannon,

        > flashlight and stop watch. If I see anything interesting,

        > I'll post the results here."

    Actually, if you get any results, please put them in the first post so everyone can see them.

    If I get any interesting results, I'll post them yesterday.

    --
    There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
  9. Re:Poor Quality Assurance does not boost confidenc by El+Torico · · Score: 4, Funny

    I bet their networking engineers are frantically trying to distance themselves from such a basic mistake.
    "It's the cleaning lady! She must have bumped into it!"

    --
    In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is usually crucified.
  10. Re:In other news by VernonNemitz · · Score: 4, Funny

    Mr. Relativistic Physics appears to be having an affair with Ms. Soap Opera. Therefore, please don't be surprised by any outcome.

  11. Re:Poor Quality Assurance does not boost confidenc by lightknight · · Score: 1, Funny

    *shrugs* It may be possible to travel faster than light. However, we do tend to have a good idea how fast various known particles DO travel. There may be unknown particles that do travel faster than light, and / or other methods that allow normal matter to traverse space / time much faster than what is currently considered feasible.

    However, CERN wasn't, to our knowledge, using wormholes or exotic matter or what not that particular day (Thursdays are wormhole days, Fridays are black-hole days, Saturdays are the day that they perform tune-ups on the chips they implanted in the EU politicians' brains, Sundays are tapioca pudding days), so no one is taking the experimental results too seriously.

    --
    I am John Hurt.