Slashdot Mirror


After US v. Jones, FBI Turns Off 3,000 GPS Tracking Devices

suraj.sun writes with this excerpt from the Wall Street Journal: "The Supreme Court's recent ruling overturning the warrantless use of GPS tracking devices has caused a 'sea change' inside the U.S. Justice Department, according to FBI General Counsel Andrew Weissmann. Mr. Weissmann, speaking at a University of San Francisco conference called 'Big Brother in the 21st Century' on Friday, said that the court ruling prompted the FBI to turn off about 3,000 GPS tracking devices that were in use. These devices were often stuck underneath cars to track the movements of the car owners. In U.S. v. Jones, the Supreme Court ruled that using a device to track a car owner without a search warrant violated the law. After the ruling, the FBI had a problem collecting the devices that it had turned off, Mr. Weissmann said. In some cases, he said, the FBI sought court orders to obtain permission to turn the devices on briefly – only in order to locate and retrieve them."

26 of 189 comments (clear)

  1. Mine now! by ewanm89 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Maybe the feds should be more careful before giving out their toys!

    1. Re:Mine now! by Jessified · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No kidding. The fact that they are having trouble locating them is troubling...is that to say they don't even know basic information on the suspect, such as his address or common residence? A means of contacting him/her?

      I'm also wondering if you could get in trouble for taking the device. If someone intentionally places something in or on your car, to me that is akin to giving it to you. Just like if someone intentionally leaves a box on my doorstep I assume it's for me. Am I supposed to ask the owner of pamphlets permission before throwing them away?

    2. Re:Mine now! by meerling · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Maybe if they put a bounty on them, $50 dollars no questions asked, or $500 if it's still in working condition.

      Hmmm, maybe the working condition bounty should be higher, I know a lot of people that would think $450 they don't yet have is a small price for showing scum exactly what they think of them. Remember, not only is this an unconstitutional invasion of privacy, it is also a declaration of war by the instigator (personal war, not literal war), and an insinuation that you are a vile criminal. Let's just say people don't like being insulted like that and without a large cash mollification, your expensive tracking toy will quickly become random junk.

  2. A much better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Tell the FBI to write a nice letter to the owners of the vehicles asking if they would kindly return the black box attached under the right rear fender.

    1. Re:A much better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Are you suggesting that federal agencies should somehow be required to admit to people that they have been illegally tracked? Such knowledge would only confuse and upset people. Far better to break the law one last time in order to covertly retrieve their hardware.

      Why do you hate America?

    2. Re:A much better idea by nbauman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That's actually a good response.

      If the FBI showed up on my door and asked for their tracking device back, I'd say, "I don't know who you are, whether you own it, or whether you have a legal right to get it. Send me a letter giving me all the details and establishing that you own it, and I'll take it to a lawyer and do what he says."

      Suppose an hour later another bunch of guys showed up and said that they were the FBI and they wanted their tracking device back?

  3. Re:3,000? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't. They most likely have many more as you can still plant/use them with a warrant. The 3000 were just for ones without warrants.

  4. Just an idea... by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What would happen if I happened to find such a device on my car and put a fine metallic mesh grounded to the chassis of the vehicle? They would have a serious problem, I guess...

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
    1. Re:Just an idea... by VortexCortex · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What would happen if I happened to find such a device on my car and put a fine metallic mesh grounded to the chassis of the vehicle? They would have a serious problem, I guess...

      What would happen if you didn't put a mesh around it to more securely affix it to the undercarriage and it came off on the highway, bounced into my windshield and caused a massive crash and multi-vehicle pile up?

      You would be ill advised to not secure such loose, or merely magnetically attached devices.

    2. Re:Just an idea... by Kennon · · Score: 3, Funny

      Although true, I don't think calling the FBI "bitches" would be very constructive in this situation.

      --
      "All those moments, will be lost in time...like tears in rain..."
  5. Re:So how are they powered? by schnikies79 · · Score: 4, Informative

    They are not that small. The battery pack is about a foot long.

    http://gizmodo.com/5658661/fbi-gets-caught-tracking-mans-car-wants-its-gps-device-back

    --
    Gone!
  6. Re:Turn it on again? by sudden.zero · · Score: 3, Informative

    GPS tracking devices are radio controlled. The device still has power when it is "off" only the Global Positioning transmitter is off and it can be turned back on at any point by sending a command to the device. In layman's terms it is kind of like a cellular "phone" which is technically a radio. Even when your ringer is off you can still receive calls you just can't hear them in which case they go to voice mail (by default), or any other number/service you have decided to reprogram the device to send to.

  7. For the full decision from the Supreme Court by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    https://www.eff.org/sites/default/files/filenode/scotusjones.pdf

    1. Re:For the full decision from the Supreme Court by magarity · · Score: 4, Informative

      For all the partisans out there, note this was a unanimous decision.

  8. Re:3,000? by hardburlyboogerman · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wouldn't it be a laugh if they found out that a lot of them had already been removed and stuck to the undercarrage of some random over the road semi?

    --
    Geek Hillbilly
  9. Re:So how are they powered? by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 5, Informative

    they burn a teeeeny tiny amount of electricity in standby - think like a a wrist watch - it can use a tiny battery for years. They only start burning juice when their accelerometer kicks in when the car moves. It then asks where it is (GPS co-ordinates) phones those in and then every (x) seconds repeats that -
    Box to GPS: "Where Am I?"
    GPS to Box:(X.Y.)
    Box: [send X.Y. to bigbrother@fbi.gov]
    In between, it's "on" but only needs to transmit every (x) seconds, and even then, not for very long. Transmitting is the big energy burner. The really good ones can last over a month assuming the car is used about an hour every day. They go back to "sleep" mode after about 5 minutes of motionlessness.
    You can buy them yourself. The good one cost about $200 - 300 and you have to pay for access to the data to be sent to you and/or access to the mashup where the data is plotted on Google maps. Don't ask why I know about this stuff...

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
  10. Re:3,000? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Are you surprised that the number is high, or that the number is low?

    Personally, what I'd love to know is whether the FBI was being lazy with those 3,000(if we can do it with or without a court order, why go to the judge?) or whether they had 3,000 active bugs for investigations so flimsy that they couldn't find a judge to sign...

    The former wouldn't be good, but would be unsurprising and fairly banal. Doing paperwork when you don't have to is a fairly rare psychological disorder, after all. The latter, on the other hand, would be 'uncomfortably retro' behavior on the FBI's part, hearkening back to their historically loose adherence to petty matters of law and due process.

  11. Re:You may already be a winner! -- a template by PPH · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sir,

    I am more than happy to comply. I have enclosed the object I located stuck to the bottom of my truck in the vicinity of the right wheel well. Although I am no expert and I don't really know what this GPS object of which you speak looks like, here it is. On my ranch, we have different names for these, depending on whether they are dried or still soft.

    A cooperative citizen.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  12. Re:3,000? by MightyMartian · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "The Supreme Court's recent ruling overturning the warrantless use of GPS tracking devices has caused a 'sea change' inside the U.S. Justice Department, according to FBI General Counsel Andrew Weissmann.

    Or, Mr. Weissmann, you and the FBI could have just picked up a copy of the Constitution. Even a cursory reading of the 4th Amendment would have told the FBI that affixing a GPS device to someone's vehicle without even the nicety of having paid a judge a visit was eventually going to get the lot of you in a legal pickle and likely mean the Supreme Court would toss it out.

    I recommend the FBI get a copy of the Constitution. It's available at your local library, at many bookstores. Hell, there's got to be a hundred thousand websites out there that have the full text.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  13. Re:3,000? by meerling · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And how many agents do they have? For that matter, do you really think we have THREE THOUSAND terrorists in our country? Or how about this, 3000 THAT WE KNOW ABOUT?

    Neither do I. So who the hell are they tracking, and why? That's a lot of law enforcement abuse of powers there, probably 3000 cases of it. Want to guess how many decades that would take to go through court if you tried to prosecute all of them? (Yeah, we have a lot of courts around the country, but those cases would be clustered in just a few.)

    3000 is a small percentage of the total populace, it however is not a small quantity of abuses of power.

  14. Re:Turn it on again? by meerling · · Score: 4, Funny

    It just struck me. This means they don't know either where the owner of that vehicle works or lives, otherwise they'd have an address to go to for retrieval purposes.

    WTH! Were they just sticking them on random cars in a McDonalds or something?

  15. Re:3,000? by flyneye · · Score: 4, Funny

    2999, I stuck mine to the bottom of a carnival ride trailer long time back.

    --
    *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  16. Re:Interesting quote from the SCOTUS ruling by NormalVisual · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Which then in turn raises a serious question - we've seen hackers prosecuted and jailed for their activities, but what kind of punishment can we expect for those responsible for the violation of Jones's Fourth Amendment rights? My money is on "none". The SCOTUS ruling doesn't mean anything at all without some kind of consequences for those responsible, as there's nothing to keep the guilty parties from willfully doing it again. And I'm not talking about some stupid fine or something that means nothing to the individual agents that made the decision to violate his civil rights. I'm talking about jail time for those who placed the devices, and their supervisors who signed off on it.

    --
    Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
  17. Re:3,000? by M.+Baranczak · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The 3000 were just for ones without warrants.

    Hard to tell, the article is light on details. That's one possible interpretation. Here's another: there were actually much more than 3000 warrant-less trackers out there. After they lost the case, the FBI tried to get warrants for all the existing trackers. Most of those requests were granted, like they usually are, and the 3000 are the ones where they were denied.

  18. Re:3,000? by JustNilt · · Score: 3, Insightful

    For that matter, do you really think we have THREE THOUSAND terrorists in our country?

    Not to defend the warrant-less trackers but do you really think the FBI only monitors and investigates suspected terrorists? They also deal with any crime that happens on Federal lands, crimes that cross state lines such as kidnappings, murders, thefts, and much more. They aren't all there just to fuck with our freedoms, you know. Yes, some members of law enforcement are power hungry assholes. That's not all of them, however, and you do a dis-service to the good ones when you forget it or trivialize what they actually do.

    --
    You know the thing about UDP jokes? I don't care if you get it or not.
  19. Re:3,000? by Ihmhi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's rare that I'll, you know, defend the government and all... but the FBI's purview extends way beyond terrorists. They handle organized crime in general, for one. I mean, the South American gangs like MS13 alone could account for a large portion of those GPS trackers. That doesn't even consider all of the other crime that they handle (bank robbery, wire fraud, etc.)