Slashdot Mirror


Vatican Attack Provides Insight Into Anonymous

Hugh Pickens writes "John Markoff writes that an unsuccessful campaign against the Vatican by Anonymous, which did not receive wide attention at the time, provides a rare glimpse into the recruiting, reconnaissance, and warfare tactics used by the shadowy hacking collective and may be the first end-to-end record of a full Anonymous attack. The attack, called Operation Pharisee in a reference to the sect that Jesus called hypocrites, was initially organized by hackers in South America and Mexico and was designed to disrupt Pope Benedict XVI's visit to Madrid in August 2011 for World Youth Day and draw attention to child sexual abuse by priests. First the hackers spent weeks spreading their message through their own website and social sites like Twitter and Flickr calling on volunteers to download free attack software and imploring them to 'stop child abuse' by joining the cause. It took the hackers 18 days to recruit enough people, then a core group of roughly a dozen skilled hackers spent three days poking around the church's World Youth Day site looking for common security holes that could let them inside. In this case, the scanning software failed to turn up any gaps so the hackers turned to a brute-force approach of a distributed denial-of-service, On the first day, the denial-of-service attack resulted in 28 times the normal traffic to the church site, rising to 34 times the next day but did not crash the site. 'Anonymous is a handful of geniuses surrounded by a legion of idiots,' says Cole Stryker, an author who has researched the movement. 'You have four or five guys who really know what they're doing and are able to pull off some of the more serious hacks, and then thousands of people spreading the word, or turning their computers over to participate in a DDoS attack.'"

6 of 355 comments (clear)

  1. Sounds just like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The organization they were attacking.

  2. Re:Anonymous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Cue as well a number of people deriding the "a handful of geniuses surrounded by a legion of idiots" idea.

    A protest is a protest. You're not an "idiot" just because you're not an organizer.

  3. Re:Anonymous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think they are trying to debunk the idea that Anonymous is a legion of hackers. Instead Anonymous is a handful of hackers surrounded by a bunch of people with computers.

  4. Mostly idiots? by Darkmane · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Anonymous is a handful of geniuses surrounded by a legion of idiots,"

    You can probably say this about most organizations in the world.

  5. Why? by afabbro · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Attacking the Catholic Church in 2012 over the priest abuse scandal is like attacking Britain over John Major's policies.

    The abuse scandal was a pattern of abuse and cover-up that exploded into the media spotlight in the late 80s/early 90s. The Church did wrong, but since then, they've done a lot of right - there's a zero-tolerance policies, lots of priests have been defrocked, billions in settlements have been paid, hundreds were jailed, etc. There will always be sexual abuse in any large organization with access to children - schools, Boy/Girl scouts, the YMCA, the Mendocino Physics Club, Gencon, whatever. So yes, there may be some that goes on today on a small scale...but what has changed is the organizational response. In 1970, a Bishop might have shuffled a pedophile priest to a different parish. Today, there's zero tolerance, formal processes, and a much greater awareness.

    So...why attack in 2012? What is the point? If this was 1990, it'd be more understandable.

    I think "anonymous" (aka a half-dozen bored kids) is just desperate to remain in the spotlight. The attention-getting is more important than any "cause". In fact, attention-getting is the cause.

    --
    Advice: on VPS providers
  6. Re:Anonymous by ClickOnThis · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I never could understand the Catholic's refusal to let priests marry, considering that one of the Apostles (Peter maybe? I'd have to look it up) said that men should marry to avoid being tempted into sinful sex, and there's surely not much that's more sinful than raping children.

    Pedophile priests are not raping children because they can't marry. They're raping children because they are sick men who should never have been allowed to wear a collar in the first place.

    --
    If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.