Slashdot Mirror


Are Rich People Less Moral?

sciencehabit writes "New research suggests that the upper classes are more likely to behave dishonorably than those lower on the economic spectrum. The rich are more likely to cheat, steal, and even disobey traffic laws than those with less money and power (abstract). Curiously, in one experiment, Prius drivers also behaved badly, regardless of their wealth."

8 of 1,040 comments (clear)

  1. Yes by Ranger · · Score: 5, Funny

    But only because they don't interact with peasants.

    --
    "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
    1. Re:Yes by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Funny

      Poor people commit crimes, rich people commit laws.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Yes by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Funny

      You keep saying that word.

      Gilligan, get more coconuts and when you're done with that build me a set of golf clubs and a golf course. There's a good lad.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    3. Re:Yes by hondo77 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Neither of those guys were on the island.

      --
      I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
  2. Selective evolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Those who lie, cheat, steal, and ignore any law they can get away with are more likely to strike it rich. Also, prius drivers are douchebags.

  3. Re:Money doesn't make people immoral. by iamwahoo2 · · Score: 4, Funny

    They should have just watched the movie "Trading Places"

  4. Re:Wealth is Not Produced by Excess of Charity... by deathguppie · · Score: 4, Funny

    OMFG!! Not miniseries.. anything but that!!

    --
    once more into the breach
  5. Re:Wealth is Not Produced by Excess of Charity... by bratwiz · · Score: 5, Funny

    What they meant was the Camel TOE was the gateway to heaven. Not really sure how the back door aspect comes into all this. However, this is the likely origin for the parable about walking a mile for a camel. And, presumably, a rich man could afford to do it in someone else's shoes. It may have also had some bearing as to whether or not it was one hump or two...