Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Torvalds Calls OpenSUSE Security 'Too Intrusive'

Posted by Unknown on from the permission-denied dept.

jfruh writes "The balance between security and ease of use is always a tricky one to strike, and Linux distros tend to err on the side of caution. But no less a luminary than Linus Torvalds thinks openSUSE has gone too far. When his kid needed to call from school for the root password just so he could add a printer to a laptop, that's when Linus decided things had gone off the rails."

9 of 311 comments (clear)

  1. Too much root is not a good thing by Toe,+The · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I see this on Macs a lot. If you want to install anything, you have to type an administrator's password.

    In theory, that's great. But in effect, you are giving that installer root access. So if I understand correctly, that installer could be putting any amount of spyware (or whatever) into your computer and nearly perfectly cover its tracks.

    Otoh, many Mac apps are distributed as disk images, where you simply drag them from the image to your drive, and that's it. No password at all. If you're going to use pre-rolled software, that certainly seems more trustworthy. But of course, it is a lot more complicated of a process for the average user to be able to ever understand.

  2. What an ass by MatthiasF · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He could have just added the user to the sudo group and been done.

    But no, he had to go harping on everyone on bug lists and social media rants to put people down, even suggesting whoever made the system should die.

    What an ass.

    1. Re:What an ass by Hatta · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why should he have to do that? Why isn't it sufficient to add the user to the 'lp' group? There's no reason that printing should require root access at all.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    2. Re:What an ass by OzPeter · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why should he have to do that? Why isn't it sufficient to add the user to the 'lp' group? There's no reason that printing should require root access at all.

      Why does an administrator have to add anyone to anything in order to do a commonplace task on a machine that is really a commodity item?
       
      Not that I have read his rants but I get where he is coming from.

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    3. Re:What an ass by ArcherB · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If I understand correctly this in effect would be giving that user root priviledges. I think his complaint was that an ordinary task like adding a printer required that level of priviledge, not that it was inconvinient to do. It sounded like he wanted to administer his childs laptop without giving them free reign over it.

      He was also a bit pissed that you need the root password to connect to a new wifi hot spot. Could imagine the network admin's nightmare of having to give the root password to a salesman trying to give a presentation on the road?

      I had the same problem with my Fedora 16 (XFCE Spin) box needed the root password to eject a CD. It really sucked that my file manager couldn't do it unless I ran it as root. I don't even know what the file manager's name to run as root and I shouldn't have to. Of course it was no big deal for me to type in "sudo eject cdrom", but I wouldn't expect the average user to know that. Besides, I shouldn't have to add standard users to the sudoers group just so they can swap a friggin CD out!

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
  3. Re:Only root? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I love these responses. "It's not broken, incapable software, you just have to buy a different printer. Noob."

  4. Re:Only root? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Only if your printer sucked. If you had a real printer you could just cat the postscript to whatever device it was connected to...

    And that's why the year of Linux on the desktop will always be next year.

  5. Re:if Torvalds kid is smart enough to use by inode_buddha · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yeah he can be a control freak, but in a way I can't blame him. Can you just imagine how many black hats would like to get into Torvalds home LAN? Consider also that the man is pulling over 250 thousand $$$ per year wouldn't somebody like to sniff his network?

    --
    C|N>K
  6. Re:Only root? by Eil · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's somehow the (free) operating system's fault because printer manufacturers design their hardware around yet another half-baked printing protocol instead of just using a standard that's been around for decades?