Slashdot Mirror


Japan Creates Earthquake-Proof Levitating House System

An anonymous reader writes "Japanese company Air Danshin Systems Inc. has developed an innovative system that levitates houses in the in the event of an earthquake to protect them from structural damage. When an earthquake hits, a sensor responds within one second by activating a compressor, which forces an incredible amount of air under the home, pushing the structure up and apart from its foundation. The air pressure can keep the home levitating up to 3cm from the shaking foundation below. In the wake of last year's Fukushima disaster the company is set to install the levitation system in 88 houses across Japan."

6 of 243 comments (clear)

  1. Here's a quick test of one of the compressors by VinylRecords · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=NubZJA4c_Rw

    Seems like it would require an awful lot of force just to float a small house. An interesting idea that might be useful in other areas. But I don't see how this could catch on long term for things like apartment buildings or skyscrapers.

    And let's not forget that it wasn't so much the earthquake that devastated Japan. But it was the wall of water that mowed down everything in its path.

  2. Re:uhh.... by Penguinisto · · Score: 4, Informative

    Well, if the system is based on the same air curtain setup as a hovercraft, liquefaction is a non-issue. Now landslides OTOH may be a bit tougher to contend with...

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
  3. Tsunami are much rarer than quakes by zooblethorpe · · Score: 4, Informative

    And let's not forget that it wasn't so much the earthquake that devastated Japan. But it was the wall of water that mowed down everything in its path.

    I'm not sure if you're aware, but earthquakes are much more common in Japan than tsunami are. Remember Kobe? There's a list of major earthquakes in Japan that might put things in perspective. Saving houses from substantial earthquake damage would be a major gain for the country.

    (Mind, I'm not saying that tsunami aren't an issue -- just that earthquakes are also an issue, and a different problem set.)

    Cheers,

    --
    "What in the name of Fats Waller is that?"
    "A four-foot prune."
  4. Tohuku Earthquake != Fukushima by tp1024 · · Score: 4, Informative

    The earthquake and tsunami was the disaster, not the accident at Fukushima. There were dead people from the nuclear accident and 50,000 evacuated (not counting those in the evacuation zone whose houses have been destroyed by the tsunami) is a lot less worse than the earthquake's and tsunami's 20.000 dead + 500,000 evacuated.

    Half a million were evacuated from utterly destroyed houses in an area now prohibited from permanent human habitation because of the tsunami hazard ... and the unwillingness of the Japanese to raise tsunami protection of cities, which reasonably enough was the same height for cities as for nuclear power plants, from 6m to 16m. Strangely enough, there was no finger pointing and no complaints about lacking tsunami protection of cities, where ... well, you know, people live (and died) and didn't get an advance warning of 2 days to evacuate before the tsunami hit.

  5. Re:Dumbest fucking idea evar by hawguy · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've heard some stupid ideas in my time, but this takes the cake.

    Seriously, man. Don't you think there could be a problem with a house that is not actually attached to its foundations?

    What's the deal with compressed air levitation. Is it good or is it whack?

    Many many houses in earthquake zones (like Memphis TN and surrounding regions) are barely attached to their foundations - often by a few rusting anchor bolts set into aging crumbling concrete. When a moderately big earthquake hits, many of those houses are going to fall off of their foundations, but unlike this Japanese house, they weren't meant to.

  6. Re:Might be cheaper to just rebuild the house. by psnyder · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's the 21st century here in Japan. Any shoji screens still in houses are usually decorative or a just to give a little visual privacy.
    We use real walls.