Slashdot Mirror


Majorana Fermion May Have Been Spotted At TU Delft

vikingpower writes "A research group at Technical University Delft around prof. Kouwenhoven has probably not only spotted pairs of so-called Majorana Fermions for the first time (these had been predicted to exist by the Italian physicist Ettore Majorana), but also demonstrated that, by generating them at the end of an Indium-Arsenide microwire, quantum computing with them may have come one more step closer to reality. The excitement around Prof. Kouwenhoven at the American Physical Society annual congress in Boston, after he completed his presentation, was considerable.A nice illustration is provided by this newspaper article (in Dutch)."

17 of 73 comments (clear)

  1. Realized halfway through the summary... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    It didn't say Marijuana

  2. Picture label wrong, it's indium-antimonide, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The picture and article differ in the wire composition, so which is it?
    indium-antimonide or indium-arsenide?

    1. Re:Picture label wrong, it's indium-antimonide, by Imrik · · Score: 4, Informative

      The picture and article agree, only the summary says different, I think you can guess which is wrong.

    2. Re:Picture label wrong, it's indium-antimonide, by NatasRevol · · Score: 2

      Plus, it's not like AC is going to reproduce this experiment, so stop being so damn anal.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    3. Re:Picture label wrong, it's indium-antimonide, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes, the summary is correct (the FA proofers should be canned for letting that through).

  3. Re:Now why didn't I think of that? by ThePeices · · Score: 2

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. But it is not magic.

    Moral of the story?
    There is no such thing as magic.

  4. Re:Now why didn't I think of that? by Dishevel · · Score: 2

    Any cool ass magic will be indistinguishable from sufficiently advanced technology.

    --
    Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
  5. Condensed Matter by tylersoze · · Score: 5, Informative

    Note we're talking about condensed matter physics here, so this isn't the discovery of a fundamental particle that is a Majorana fermion, just a composite particle (similar to a Cooper pair) that appears to behave like a Majorana fermion. I'm sure this is an exciting discovery, but I tend to get more excited about fundamental particle discoveries.

    BTW, maybe someone can enlighten me further, but since neutrinos have mass wouldn't they probably have to be Majorana fermion? You could catch up to a neutrino and make it appear as right-handed in some reference frame which would presumably make it's anti-matter right-handed counterpart? Neutrinoless double-beta decay is what would confirm that, right?

  6. not a real elementary particle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is not a discovery of real elementary particle, instead it is a quasiparticle. It behaves (in its quantum properties) like Majorana Fermions, much in the same way a "hole" in a semiconductor behaves like a positively charged particle.

  7. Re:Yeah Yeah ... by Beelzebud · · Score: 2

    It takes many small steps to complete a long journey. You seeing many similar announcements because progress is being made...

  8. Translated and edited Dutch news article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I may or may not have butchered this, but I think its better than googles. All edits from original google translation are mine, as are any omissions.

    --

    Since 1937, physicists in Delft have sought to observe evidence of Majorana fermions, a fundamental particle whose properties may soon be used in quantum supercomputing.

    Recently, Delft physicists have claimed to be the first to create this exotic new elementary particle, showing in addition how it can play a key role in the supercomputer of the future. They made their discovery not in a giant particle accelerator, but at the intersection of superconducting nanowires on a chip.

    Prof. Leo Kouwenhoven, who made the discovery, announced the results at the annual meeting of the American Physical Society (APS). The news caused a wave of excitement among the thousands of present physicists. A reporter of the weekly Nature likened the situation to a busy train station during rush hour.

    "Have we seen Majorana fermions? I'd say a cautious 'yes'", stated Kouwenhoven at the end of his presentation in Boston. Other physicists said that the Delft measurements cannot be explained other than by the presence of a Majorana-like particle.

    The results have been published in the journal "Physical Review Letters". The so-called Majorana-fermion is one of the strangest elementary particles that physicists know, at least on paper. The possible existence was predicted in 1937 by the Italian physicist Ettore Majorana (1906-1938). Since then, physicists have looked everywhere for natural Majorana particles, but without success. Several years ago, attention was shifted to the observable effects in some solids which Majorana particles would create.

    The Delft group found the first indications of the Majorana particles at the ends of a partially superconducting microscopic thread of indium antimonide. Kouwenhoven has long been investigating such nanowires -- last year he received a grant of one million dollars of software maker Microsoft for his quest for the artificial-Majorana fermion. Even physics financier FOM put up one million.

    Microsoft's interest stems from the possibility of computer memory with Majorana particles. Such a computer would not use 1 or 0 bit states; Instead, it will use quantum bits, which facilitate much more computation. The problem with such a quantum computer is that quantum bits are sensitive to disturbances. Pairs of Majorana particles form an exception. They can be disrupted, but owing to their special mathematical properties, they always spring back to their original state. That is a desired property for a robust quantum memory system.

    In the research, each memory element comprises a nanowire of indium-arsenide in which two electrodes with the underlying quasi-particles produce so-called Majorana's. These are not sensitive to external disturbances causing an internal conditions change. The two Majorana on each of the elements form together a qubit. Qubits are the ones and zeros which allow a quantum computer to carry out numerous calculations simultaneously, instead of all the calculation steps one by one, as in conventional computers.

  9. [a,a+]=1 by Janek+Kozicki · · Score: 3, Interesting

    OK, Majorana Fermion is a particle for which a=a+
    But by definition the second quantization operators [a,a+]=(aa+)-(a+a)=1

    So we have a contradiction here, because if a=a+, then [a,a+]=0, which does not obey to the definition of second quantization operator.

    Someone cares to enlighten me?

    How do those Majorana a and a+ operators look in positional representation? How does the first wave function look like?

    I'll try later to find original Majorana papers, but in meantime if you have some hints I'd be glad to hear.

    --
    #
    #\ @ ? Colonize Mars
    #
    1. Re:[a,a+]=1 by zakaryah · · Score: 3, Insightful

      For fermions, the canonical commutation relations must use the anticommutator: {a,b} = ab + ba. The Majorana fermion is a fermion. But, that doesn't completely answer your question, since you could correctly apply your reasoning to bosons which are their own antiparticle, like the photon, to claim that [a,a+]=0. But you have to keep in mind that the antiparticle of a photon is time-reversed compared to that photon - a+ and a are still distinct.

    2. Re:[a,a+]=1 by zakaryah · · Score: 2

      It depends on the Hamiltonian. But, you can calculate it in the following way for some systems you are familiar with: Let a+ and a be creation/annihilation operators for your (non-Majorana) fermion. You can define new operators, which obey the commutation relation for fermions: b = (a+ + a)/2 and b' = (a+ - a)/2i. But both of these operators satisfy bi = bi+, so the quasiparticles on which these operators act are Majorana fermions. If you want the position representation for b or b', you just need the position representations of the underlying ladder operators a+ and a.

  10. Oulde Neuws by Obfuscant · · Score: 2
    This is old news. When I was at Deltares a couple of years ago, they had three or four mating pairs of Majorana Fermions swimming in the pool near their main offices. I don't think they were spotted, though. They were speckled.

    That's pretty close to TU Delft, so maybe the ones TU Delft has found are one of the pairs from Deltares?

    At least I THINK that's what the Dutch speaking guide called them.

  11. Re:Now why didn't I think of that? by jackbird · · Score: 4, Funny

    Are you saying the other ones were formed by magic?

  12. Re:Can somebody please explain by The+Master+Control+P · · Score: 3, Informative

    Ever wonder why atomic weights vary from place to place?

    No, because they don't. The mass of avagadro's number of carbon 12 atoms is the same - 12 grams - everywhere. The weight might differ due to G not being constant across earth but that's not exactly news either. And if atomic weights did depend on where you are in space, there's be all kinds of zomgwtf effects that would've been seen a long time ago.