Slashdot Mirror


Apple Unveils New iPad

adeelarshad82 writes "As expected, Apple announced the new iPad complete with a Retina Display, quad-core processor, 4G LTE, and an improved camera. The new iPad will run the rumored A5X processor, which according to Apple will provide four times the performance of the Tegra 3. The revamped tablet will also include a 2048-by-1536 display, apparently the most in any mobile device. And finally with 4G LTE, the new iPad will provide up to 73 Mbps download speeds; partners for which include Verizon, Rogers, Bell, Telus, and AT&T."

7 of 989 comments (clear)

  1. Quad core by WilyCoder · · Score: 5, Informative

    Quad core graphics, not quad core CPU...

  2. Re:Thicker and heavier than the iPad 2 by dingo_kinznerhook · · Score: 5, Informative

    0.07 pounds heavier. I stand corrected.

    --
    "God does not play Minecraft with the world." - Albert Einstein
  3. Upgraded Apple TV announced by UnknowingFool · · Score: 5, Informative

    Apple also announced a new Apple TV that will have 1080p for the same price as the current generation: $99. I didn't read any other changes.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  4. 73mbps != 4G by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    You will never get that speed on the device. I have a 4G LTE cell phone and it doesn't even get 10% of that speed.

    Hell it shouldn't even be allowed to be called 4G. The 4G standard is 100Mbps for high mobility devices (cellphones in cars) and 1Gbps for low mobility devices (people walking down the street or in their homes). This is a fraud in advertising.

  5. Cores: the reason by DrYak · · Score: 5, Informative

    For whatever reason, the PowerVR mobile GPUs are described in number of cores.

    Well there's a technical reason. To go back to the grand parent:

    You talk about them in terms of shaders, ROPs, TMUs and so on.

    These are organised in a module. The various different models in a range a distinguished by the number of such modules. (That's what the number of "Streming Multiprocessor" is in tables of GeForce cards).

    Either by product binning: the factory makes GPU with 8 such modules, then test how many of these are actually usable and how many have defects and then activate between 1 and 7 of them and sells them as a different product in the same range. From "GPU Destructor 990 XL-Deluxe Elite" (with 7 of the 8 core activated - and needs 3 12v connectors) down to "GPU Destructor 120 Light Laptop Edition (only 1 usable core, but sips only 30 Watts). (And some time less core are activated than actually usable due to demand and offer economic laws, leading to users who try to unlock core and convert one card to the next one in the series simply by flashing a new firmware - a classic with some GeForce series).

    Or by producing variants: Desktop range a based on a 8-module design, Laptop range have a 4 module design at a finer process, so it uses a lot less energy.
    (I know some ATI/AMD GPUs are organised so).

    In the case of PowerVR, from what I remember, GPUs were designed to be able to work in parallel (I think: each GPU taking care of a different tile of the deferred tile-based rendering). So it's very likely that maket speak "4 core GPU" means "4 modules" which in fact is "4 powerVRs working in parallel" (for a speed increase approaching 4x).

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  6. Re:Which is an... odd way to talk about graphics by blueg3 · · Score: 5, Informative

    But in general it can't. GPUs are designed differently and don't actually run a large number of different shaders in parallel. They use a combination of multicore processing and data-parallel execution to run the same shader (or a small number of shaders) on a large pool of data in parallel. A lot of it is more similar to SIMD instructions available on many CPUs than multiple cores.

  7. Re:And yet the market is disappointed by BasilBrush · · Score: 5, Informative

    Right. So when you didn't think AAPL was growing it was a "big yawn". Now you know it is, it's "bubble". How childish are you?

    This despite the fact that my post you replies to said iPad growth, not AAPL growth. Here, take a look at those.
    http://frncs.co/apple/

    Or look at it another way. Only 2 years on the market and Apple already sells more iPads than any PC manufacturer sells PCs.

    Bubbles are irrational rises in stock price based on sentiment. AAPLs rise is based on unprecedented sales growth.