Slashdot Mirror


Sony's Plan To Tighten Security and Fight Hacktivism

mask.of.sanity writes "Sony Entertainment Network is rebuilding its information security posture to defend against hacktivism. It includes a security operations center that serves as a nerve center collating information on everything from staff phone calls, to CCTV, to PlayStation gamers. If it is successful, the counter intelligence-based system will be deployed across the entire company. 'At Sony, we are modifying our programs to deal less with state-sponsored [attacks] and more with socially-motivated hackers. It will be different,' said Chief Security Officer Brett Wahlin."

17 of 247 comments (clear)

  1. *clap* *clap* by FrozenFood · · Score: 5, Interesting

    good for them

    pity I wont buy another sony product ever again.

    1. Re:*clap* *clap* by Ihmhi · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You have to read between the lines here man.

      They're not saying "We were attacked for being a socially irresponsible company, so we're going to do less evil shit." They're saying "We were attacked for doing evil shit, so we're going to keep doing evil shit and make it harder to successfully attack us."

    2. Re:*clap* *clap* by hairyfeet · · Score: 5, Informative

      I don't know about him but I personally don't buy Sony because they have a serious "Hey, how can we REALLY buttfuck our customers HARD?" attitude. See ATRAC, Minidisc, memory stick, UMD, if given a chance they will completely ignore formats every else uses and is cheap for some proprietary throwback that is worse in every way for the consumer, no thanks.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    3. Re:*clap* *clap* by Nursie · · Score: 5, Informative

      Name, address, gaming habits (every game you play, the times you play, how long for), any movies you may have downloaded from them, integrated tv services you've used...

      These are just the things I know the box was sending to Sony from my protocol snooping a year or so back.

      I'm not sure if the machine sends web history to Sony, or what you've been watching/listening to on the ps3 via UPnP/DLNA, but it wouldn't be beyond their capabilities.

    4. Re:*clap* *clap* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Just because of how Sony handled this? Please, after this fiasco they'll be the safest company to trust your info to. Sony didn't handle the breach well, nor did it inform customers as it should have, but guess what? NO OTHER COMPANY would have done ANYTHING different. I'll bet there are many that would've tried to deny the whole thing.

      I'm socially motivated to never buy anything from Sony again as well, but it has nothing to do with whatever their latest stupid shananigans are. Sony earned a permaban with their rootkit. Remember that?

    5. Re:*clap* *clap* by Nursie · · Score: 5, Informative

      And the Vita uses?

      Oh that's right, proprietary "vita cards" for games, proprietary "vita memory cards" for storage, and even a non-standard data cable.

      Good work!

    6. Re:*clap* *clap* by Sneeka2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And guess who designed Blu-ray and shoveled tons of money into the project to push it into the market to destroy to rival HD DVD format: Sony. Learn your history.

      Also, comparing two very specific systems which are by definition very closed (gaming consoles) and a music player (which I guess you're going for with that Apple jibe) is hardly an objective comparison in the big picture. If that's all you know about these respective companies, fine, but please stay in your mom's basement.

      --
      Bitten Apples are still better than dirty Windows...
    7. Re:*clap* *clap* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      And today on our fun game show My Favorite Random Multi-National Conglomerate Sucks Less Than Your Random Multi-National Conglomerate, we introduce our first contestant: peppepz!

    8. Re:*clap* *clap* by SuricouRaven · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think you have it backwards: If the company management isn't willing to do evil, the company will never reach that mass. Sooner or later the time will come when the management must choose between their principles and their duty to maximise profits - they can't have both.

    9. Re:*clap* *clap* by macs4all · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Isn't that kinda how these big businesses work in general these days? Microsoft, Apple, Sony, Samsung, Motorola, Oracle, Intel, Dell, etc? I guess I'm just saying if someone has an issue with Sony they probably have an issue with the whole industry & it's practices, not /just/ Sony...

      Apple removed DRM from iTunes music. Sony installed Rootkits.

      Apple has no DRM on its OS. Sony has aggressively fought against Playstation hacking.

      Apple has a Cloud service which mirrors your music to all your devices, regardless of where it came from. Sony?

      Apple had a marketing slogan "Rip. Mix. Burn.". Sony created Blu-Ray as an unsuccessful defense against DeCSS.

      Apple builds AirPlay into OS X and iOS. Sony creates SACD's DSD format as an (unsuccessful) attempt to stop CD copying (betcha didn't know that one!).

      Apple actively and significantly contributes to the F/OSS Community. Sony, OTOH has been caught USING F/OSS code without attribution and in violation of those project's licensing (libarc) in its game, ICO, and parts of LAME (id3lib and more) in an OCX control.

      Yep. no way whatsoever to tell those two companies apart by their respective actions.

    10. Re:*clap* *clap* by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 5, Informative

      What you have failed to realize is that the "App Store Lock-In", and even the "iOS Development Licensing" are actually there to benefit USERS (by keeping Malware OUT, OUT, OUT).

      As well as keeping pornography and political cartoons, software that might compete with Apple, software that might allow people to develop more software in a sandboxed environment, software that might allow people to play old SNES games, etc. OUT OUT OUT. The "this benefits users" argument is nothing more than a cover story; Apple could benefit users without forbidding jailbreaking, without bricking phones that were jailbroken, and without having a policy that forbids lampooning politicians.

      Sony's Rootkit and Playstation DRM battles are there to benefit SONY.

      So how is that not-locked-down gaming platform working for you? Oh yeah, malware:

      https://encrypted.google.com/search?q=windows+malware&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a

      Apple's iOS DRM serves exactly the same purpose as PS3's DRM: to thwart competition, prevent customers from controlling their computers (which includes phones and gaming systems) and to tap developers' revenue streams.

      --
      Palm trees and 8
  2. Cheaper strategy by mcbridematt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Don't be dicks.

  3. Wrong way of thinking by gzipped_tar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As part of the society, you should think about how not to become a target of hacking activism. Especially when it's impossible to crush every one of the "hackers".

    Better yet, convert them into your loyal customers, and even better, direct their anger to your competitors.

    --
    Colorless green Cthulhu waits dreaming furiously.
  4. Re:wrong medication by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Here's a start:

    1. Bring back OtherOS
    2. Stop supporting CSS, AACS, HDCP and other forms of DRM
    3. Apologise for installing rookits on people's computers without their knowledge
    4. Apologise for taking legal action against people who circumvented their digital restrictions

  5. Everybody needs an Anti-Cyber-Threat-Center! by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 5, Funny

    NATO just dropped a few billion for one! Now SONY will have one! Where's yours!?!?!

    I smell Y2k sized contract money now!

    I am now a Anti-Cyber-Threat-Security-Response-Operations-Analysis-Coordination-Center Specialist!

    In the train:
    Passenger: "What line of work are you in?"
    Me: "Cyber Security!"
    Passenger: "Do I need that?"
    Me: "Does your wife know about the email to your girlfriend on your laptop that I am reading right now?"
    Passenger: "Ok, I'll buy some."
    Passenger: "But do I need to wear that tinfoil hat . . . ?"

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  6. For all haters by Forty+Two+Tenfold · · Score: 5, Funny
    --
    Upward mobility is a slippery slope - the higher you climb the more you show your ass.
  7. Anti-Social by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Evidently Sony learned nothing from the cause/effect relationship of their brutal approach to both security and their users. Sony set the stage by deploying rootkits and other security attacks on their own customers. Then they retroactively deleted the Linux (OtherOS) option from PS3s, many of which they'd sold to hackers for the very purpose of "hacking Sony". Though OtherOS had been crippled from the beginning, there was little effort by PS3 hackers to crack the lockout from the hardware, until Sony tried shutting all OtherOS users down. Then hacking the PS3 became necessary for every PS3 Linux user.

    It was a case of "when guns (OtherOSes) are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns (OtherOSes)". Why stop at just keeping what you paid for, when you had actually paid for more than you'd originally gotten? Sony had destroyed any ethical relationship, and the community was organized.

    Now, I'm not pinning all or even most of the attacks on Sony beyond keeping Linux on the small PS3 Linux community - maybe not even any of them. But that episode showed the world Sony was a legitimate target. Then after some success in keeping what they paid for resulted in arresting the hacker, Sony was now a legit target for both legitimate hacking and just plain "bash the bad guy". Combine that with Sony's copyright overreaches, its region-encoding scams, its DVD backup denials (also broken and showing Sony both greedy and vulnerable) - Sony fanned the flames of backlash.

    Now Sony is just escalating the conflict. It would be a lot cheaper to give hackers back Linux, this time with some support, to give them more of a common interest with Sony. Instead Sony is further defining itself as an enemy instead of a partner. Sony's awareness of social networks seems to be purely as either enemy or marketing victim. This will not end well. In fact it will not end, and many will suffer.

    --

    --
    make install -not war