Slashdot Mirror


Journalist Gets Blasted By the Pentagon's Pain Ray — Twice

dsinc writes "Wired's Spencer Ackerman voluntarily subjected himself to what the U.S. military calls the Active Denial System, an energy weapon commonly known as the 'Pain Ray' that turns electricity into millimeter wave radio frequency and blasts targets with heat. He describes it thus: 'When the signal goes out over radio to shoot me, there’s no warning — no flash, no smell, no sound, no round. Suddenly my chest and neck feel like they’ve been exposed to a blast furnace, with a sting thrown in for good measure. I’m getting blasted with 12 joules of energy per square centimeter, in a fairly concentrated blast diameter. I last maybe two seconds of curiosity before my body takes the controls and yanks me out of the way of the beam.'" The device has been tested now on over 11,000 people, with only two serious injuries to show for it. However, the device has limitations: rainy weather decreases its effectiveness, and its "boot-up" time is 16 hours, making it useless for breaking up unexpected, impromptu mobs.

8 of 357 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Uh, what by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    > No matter how sllloooowww the CPUs, or how inefficient the code, 16 hours isn't plausible.

    Only if you're crazy enough to think the CPU is a ray gun's limitation. As opposed to, you know, energy generation itself

  2. Re:Corner reflector by sideslash · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Good luck with that. If you are successful, you will be accused of doing horrible things to a law enforcement person, and will be locked away for a very, very long time. The prosecution will describe the effects of the heat ray in very different terms than the defense would, if the tables were turned and you were suing law enforcement for using it on you.

  3. Re:future weapons ? by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Depends on your frame of reference. Something that happened a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away may not have happened here yet. If it happened 5m years ago (their time) in a galaxy 5.1m lightyears away then it's still 100,000 years in our future.

    Hey, you started it.

    --
    Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
  4. Other unfortunate uses by JeanCroix · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sixteen hours warmup might be far too long for use as crowd control, but it's plenty of time for use in interrogations.

  5. Re:Faster than windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's a joke. Laugh.

  6. I saw this on TV the other day by OzPeter · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The reporter said that the injuries that were sustained were 2nd degree burns because the people didn't get out the way quick enough.

    But what if you can't get out of the way? If you are trapped you could easily sustain 2nd or 3rd degree burns over quite a bit of your body - and that sort of thing is potentially lethal.

    This device is non-lethal in the sense that a bullet is non-lethal. I shoot someone in the hand they probably don't die. I shoot someone in the head and they will probably die.

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  7. Injury depends on length of exposure. by ZombieBraintrust · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I last maybe two seconds of curiosity before my body takes the controls and yanks me out of the way of the beam

    The person who was injured in the testing was overexposed. So if used outside the lab your going to have injured people. People will fall down and if the machine is ran to long they will be burned. This is similer to the LRAD system that uses sounds instead of microwaves. It has already been used by law enformcement and has caused hearing loss on someone who fell down.

  8. Re:future weapons ? by kegel+dragon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So you're basically saying, like Obi-Wan, that it depends on "your point of view"?