Slashdot Mirror


George "geohot" Hotz Arrested In Texas For Posession of Marijuana

n1ywb writes "Goerge 'geohot' Hotz, famous for being the first to jailbreak an iPhone and for his spat with Sony over PS3 jailbreaking, was busted for possession of a small amount of marijuana at a U.S. Border Patrol checkpoint in Texas on his way to SXSW. The shakedown goes like this: drug dogs are run around vehicles; when they signal, DHS searches the car and finds the contraband; DHS then turns evidence and suspects over to the local sheriff. Willie Nelson, actor Armie Hammer (who played the Winklevoss twins in The Social Network), and Snoop Dogg have all gotten in trouble at the same checkpoint under similar circumstances."

14 of 578 comments (clear)

  1. "When they signal" is the important part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    It is very key that the poster used the word "when" when referring to the drug dogs, rather than saying "if they signal". Multiple studies have shown that drug dogs are essentially a fraudulent way to get around probable cause during a vehicle stop.

    1. Re:"When they signal" is the important part by rahvin112 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Every drug dog has a different signal.Their handler is trained to recognize it. Some dogs dig at the location, some sit, some look at the handler. There is no uniform signal because dogs can't talk so the dogs are often trained to react the same way they did the first time they found something which could be almost anything.

  2. Not crossing the border! by ehiris · · Score: 5, Informative

    These checkpoints are not for those who cross the border. They are unconstitutional search and seizure checkpoints within the US. The pretense is that they are close to borders.

    If the borders are so well protected, why do they need these checkpoints? There is no warrant.

    1. Re:Not crossing the border! by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 4, Informative

      Being a citizen on US soil is irrelevant if a border crossing is involved, because everyone is subject to search at the border.

      http://search.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2727991&cid=39367407

  3. Shop local! by Matt_Bennett · · Score: 4, Informative

    Austin is proud of its local businesses- 'Keep Austin Weird" is an advertising slogan of the Austin Business Alliance- Surely, he could have supported one of our local entrepreneurs and looked for a local source.

  4. Re:Newsflash: they have drug dogs at Mexico-US bor by rwade · · Score: 4, Informative

    Okay -- I wasn't aware that this was one of those internal "border patrol" checkpoints. Should have RTFA.

  5. Re:Meh by eratosthene · · Score: 5, Informative

    Clearly you don't know very much about how many counties in Texas operate. Sure, in Travis county (where Austin is located), it would be a minor offense. Right next door in Williamson county? Any contraband, including just a pipe, will guarantee an overnight stay in jail. Paraphernalia is a minimum of $500 fine. An oz of weed could net you a year's probation. Anything over a gram of any other illegal substance will be a felony, with 4-10 years probation if you take the plea bargain. It's fucking sickening.

    --
    -- There, everybody likes a gorilla.
  6. Re:How is this constitutional? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is nothing new.

    Any location within 100 miles of a US federal border is an officially Constitution-free zone. This neatly covers the homes of roughly 2/3 of all Americans.

    You have no rights, so stop deluding yourself and do something about it.

    From the ACLU:
    Are You Living in a Constitution-free Zone?
    Constitution-free Zone Fact Sheet
    Constitution-free Zone Interactive Map

  7. Re:Smart people can be dumb by Isaac-1 · · Score: 4, Informative

    The reality is the west Texas I-10 check point outside El Paso may be 30-40 miles from the city, but that stretch of I-10 closely (within 2-5 miles) parallel's the border for about 50-60 miles, and the checkpoint is located where the highway/border start to diverege.

  8. Re:Smart people can be dumb by tylersoze · · Score: 5, Informative

    Fair enough, but some of them are at least 75 miles from the border it looks like.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Border_Patrol_Interior_Checkpoints

    It's still ridiculous being subjected to this nonsense without probable cause. Of course, I also think sobriety check points are unconstitutional too. Even though I would never run afoul of either since I don't smoke or drink, I still care about our actual freedoms.

  9. Re:Smart people can be dumb by ewieling · · Score: 5, Informative

    That depends on the state. In Texas " The possession of two ounces or less of marijuana is punishable by up to 180 days in jail and a fine up to $2,000."

    --
    I really shouldn't have used someone else's email address for this account.
  10. Re:You don't say by datavirtue · · Score: 4, Informative

    Goddamn that article was lame. Yes, I read the article and I am now sorry I did. Well, you live and learn.

    --
    I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
  11. Re:Smart people can be dumb by Anrego · · Score: 4, Informative

    I imagine all the stuff that would come up for him on google is going to trump a minor possession charge.

    Anyone hiring him is probably hiring him specifically because of his legal history.

  12. Re:Smart people can be dumb by Gutboy · · Score: 4, Informative

    Wrong. Police officers can react to anything that is in "plain sight", meaning anything that escapes from your car, be it photons or small particles which we refer to as "scent"

    Not true. The U.S. Supreme Court, which ruled in U.S. v. Kyllo (2001) that the police can not use infrared cameras to locate "suspicious" concentrations of heat in private places and then get warrants to search. So anything that escapes is not "in plain sight".