Slashdot Mirror


Julian Assange To Run For Australian Senate

New submitter bozman8 writes "Announced recently on social networking platform Twitter, Julian Assange has found a way to run for the Upper House of the Australian Senate, despite being detained under house arrest in Britain. Along with Julian's candidacy, WikiLeaks has announced that they are going to run a nominee against current Prime Minister Julia Gillard in her local electorate."

8 of 207 comments (clear)

  1. Go Assange! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Go Assange! I wonder if they would trust him with secret documents!

    1. Re:Go Assange! by MichaelSmith · · Score: 5, Funny

      He already has them.

  2. Re:Yeah...I don't like this. by Ihmhi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    An attention whore who gets said attention by exposing the flat-out evil things all of our governments do on a near-daily basis.

    At least he does something for society compared to any of those reality show retards.

  3. Re:Yeah...I don't like this. by dbet · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Whistleblowers and muckrakers shouldn't be a part of the government.

    Neither should liars and assholes. But guess what?

  4. Despite being under house arrest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Being a British criminal has never kept anyone out of Australia, quite the contrary. ;)

    And what better place than with all the other criminals that run the country?

  5. Re:Yeah...I don't like this. by Confusedent · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm sorry, did you forget about the part where the US government covered it up and lied to Reuters about the investigation? Do you particularly think it's all ok just because it was in their "Rules of Engagement"? If the government says that torturing and killing your family is part of their "Rules of Engagement," is that ok with you? Weekly Standard is neoconservative propaganda founded by News Corp and supported solely by people like Rupert Murdoch (according to Wikipedia the magazine has NEVER been profitable, citing the NY Times), the same liars who spread the same government propaganda that started the Iraq War (remember those WMDs? Whatever happened to those, hm?). US apologists make me sick.

  6. Re:Yeah...I don't like this. by cheaphomemadeacid · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yeah! right! And you are also confused about the drones in pakistan, when they crash a terrorist wedding (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drone_attacks_in_Pakistan). But good thing that the U.S could make us those magic drones, somehow, whoever those drones kill, they magically become terrorists post mortem. So, these drones are only used for antiterrorist purposes!

  7. Re:Good luck with that. by Confusedent · · Score: 5, Informative

    Oh trust me, I am aware. I've been arrested (case later dismissed) because of women lying about me, and even had to call the cops three months ago to explain how another girl I'd been involved with was trying to spoof emails to frame me for "harassment" in order to avoid paying me the money she owed me. But the US government has wanted to get Assange extradited to the US so they could try him under the Espionage Act ever since the Collateral Murder video. I don't see how they'll be able to do that just from this, maybe they think they can put more pressure on the Swedish government than the UK, or maybe they think discrediting him as a rapist or putting him in Swedish jail is satisfactory. Sure, I admit I can't prove it's part of an ochestrated smear campaign or conspiracy, but given the fact that the accusations are based on an apparently obscure and rarely used "surprise sex" law, the timing of the incidents, the fact that at least some people in the Swedish legal system wanted to just throw the case out when it originally happened (this is from memory, sorry I couldn't find a link), I think I'd have to be gloriously naive to think the US didn't play a role in all this, even if they weren't directly involved with the two women making the accusations.

    If this is unreasonable, call me out on it, but honestly how can anyone take these charges seriously?