Slashdot Mirror


NSA Chief Denies Claims of Domestic Spying

AstroPhilosopher writes "Recently Wired, USA Today and other news outlets reported on a new spy center being built to store intercepted communications (even American citizens'). Tuesday, Gen. Keith Alexander testified in front of Congress refuting the articles. Alexander even went so far as to claim the NSA lacks the authority to monitor American citizens. It's an authority that was given to the NSA through the FISA Amendments Act signed into law by Bush and still supported today by Obama."

6 of 149 comments (clear)

  1. Okay then... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If the NSA isn't spying on American citizens, then why are they so steadfastly opposed to EFF, EPIC, etc. trying to obtain that information from them in court?

    What is their explanation about the monitoring rooms in AT&T's facilities that tap into domestic fiber?

    They won't give us an explanation in a court room but they'll make promises that they aren't.

    Sorry, I can't trust the words of an organization that is vital to the interest of a dying empire.

  2. Godwin. by Forty+Two+Tenfold · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When you lie, “Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it”. — Adolf Hitler

    --
    Upward mobility is a slippery slope - the higher you climb the more you show your ass.
  3. Re:Loophole by PatentMagus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Loophole no longer needed. Remember when Candidate Obama promised to end illegal spying on American citizens? Who would have dreamed he intended to end the illegality by making it "legal" (quote marks to indicate not tested in court). At least he addressed the issue. The other 2008 candidates thought it was just fine the way it was.

    It's kind of quaint to look back at how mad I was about the spying when I now tiredly shrug my shoulders about the assassinations and that "due process" now means there is a process instead of meaning a chance to defend yourself in court.

    --
    I am a lawyer, but not yours. Anything I tell you might be a total lie intended to benefit my clients at your expense.
  4. Re:Wut? by cellocgw · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You can't compare the world today with any time in history. Humans never had the capability to destroy the whole world.
    Well, considering that up until a couple hundred years ago, hardly anyone ever travelled or moved more than a couple miles from the town in which he was born, the subjective meaning of "destroy the whole world" becomes "destroy everyone in my town." As our worldview grew, so did our weapons.

    --
    https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
  5. Re:Wut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Okay, suppose we've "woken up". Now what? If you're advocating open revolt, then "you first". If you're advocating working from within the system, how do you propose to organize and push from the roots up?

    I always hear "wake up Sheeple!" in posts, usually from older guys, with a big, echoing, lack of substance after the waking up part, as if they're saying "now that you've woken up, you know what to do... I've done my part".

    Take the next step, my friend- Do it the right/hard way, organize properly, with people that have made enough of themselves to be respected & listened to AND be willing to lose it all. Unfortunately, you're not going to find many that fit in this category.

    Look at the founders of our Republic- A fair number of them were men of some means that put it all on the line, yet died in poverty after the revolution was successful- Where are you going to find people like that now?

    And don't waste your time going around blowing shit up or killing innocent people to convince yourself that you're "making a statement" so you can feel good about having done something- aside from little issues concerning morality and ethics, it has rarely if ever created a lasting difference, and sure as hell won't work now.

    If you are not willing to put everything you have and love, including your life, your fortune, and that of those of those you love on the line, please shut the fuck up.

  6. Re:Hmmm... by JonahsDad · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Of course the NSA does NOT have the ability to do what Congress asked the general about. If they had that ability, they wouldn't need to build the Utah data center. Once the data center is complete, they'll have the ability. Just not right now.