Glibc Steering Committee Dissolves; Switches To Co-Operative Development Model
First time accepted submitter bheading writes "Following years under controversial leadership which, among other things, led to a fork (which was in turn adopted by some of the major distributions) the glibc development process has been reinvented to follow a slightly more informal, community-based model. Here's hoping glibc benefits from a welcome dose of pragmatism."
The pissing match between RMS and Drepper that resulted in the steering committee is no longer longer relevant now Drepper has gone to work at Goldman Sachs (something that makes me smile: I can't think of any other company more deserving of him).
I am TheRaven on Soylent News
Those are not forks, they are different implementations. The Android libc is based on FreeBSD libc with some tweaks. It does not share code with glibc.
I am TheRaven on Soylent News
Theo and Drepper are very different. Theo is usually technically correct and has no time for people who can't work out why for themselves. Drepper is very often wrong, and is still an asshat in these cases.
I am TheRaven on Soylent News
When I first started using Linux (about '97).. I emailed Torvalds to say that I thought Linux needed to advertise because a lot of people didn't know it existed. He actually responded and politely explained how the project is put together/why that wasn't going to happen.
Amen! ...) where each has a very clear usage, and if you don't want graphics you don't use QtGui, but if you do, everything is in QtGui. Here's the list
I like Qt's approach with only a couple of large libraries (QtCore, QtGui, QtXml,