Slashdot Mirror


Using Pulsars For Spacecraft Navigation

Jimme Blue writes "The use of pulsars as a GPS analogue holds the promise of fixing a spacecraft's location to within 5 km, anywhere in the galaxy. While not ready for immediate use, it may be ready for use within the Solar System in the next 10-15 years. From the article: '"The principle is so simple that it will definitely have applications," said Prof Werner Becker from the Max-Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics in Garching. "These pulsars are everywhere in the Universe and their flashing is so predictable that it makes such an approach really straightforward," he told BBC News.'"

24 of 77 comments (clear)

  1. Visibility is an issue by gstrickler · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Within the solar system, visibility to a known set of pulsars shouldn't be an issue, but as you venture outside the solar system, which pulsars are visible may begin to change as pulsars don't emit in all directions. In practice, most pulsars in a given galaxy probably rotate/emit more or less in the galactic plane, so, even within a galaxy, it's probably a good reference. But that's definitely a risky method if you start moving out of the galactic plane.

    --
    make imaginary.friends COUNT=100 VISIBLE=false
    1. Re:Visibility is an issue by busyqth · · Score: 5, Funny

      even within a galaxy, it's probably a good reference. But that's definitely a risky method if you start moving out of the galactic plane.

      Now that's too bad because I was planning on moving out of the galactic plane sometime later this year.

    2. Re:Visibility is an issue by Alain+Williams · · Score: 4, Interesting

      As the spaceship moves some pulsars will drop out of visibility and others will become visible - so the spacecraft can lock on to the new ones, using the old ones to calibrate them. That would work unless we develop some kind of 'jump' technology where we appear at great distance from our last position and have no pulsars in common between the two places, but that would be an interesting problem to have.

    3. Re:Visibility is an issue by vlm · · Score: 3

      Galaxies don't drop in or out of visibility... at least not like pulsars. But they're big fuzzy sources.

      So you use galaxies to get a rough fix, then use pulsars as a distinct, precise point source to get a fine fix.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    4. Re:Visibility is an issue by Abreu · · Score: 2

      Let's worry about that _after_ we develop a FTL drive or some sort of wormhole navigation system.

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    5. Re:Visibility is an issue by Yetihehe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I, for one, would like to know how to get my exact position BEFORE I'm teleported to some random corner of galaxy.

      --
      Extreme Programming - Redundant Array of Inexpensive Developers
    6. Re:Visibility is an issue by gstrickler · · Score: 4, Informative

      Your logic is flawed. The Milky Way doesn't follow lie along the equator because the earth is tilted on it's axis.

      The fact that we can see other pulsars (many of them) from within the Milky Way means that those pulsars are either rotating on an axis nearly perpendicular to the galactic plane (aka galactic equator), or they're tilted relative to to the galactic plane and we happen to be nearly perpendicular to their axis of rotation. Since we know that not all stars rotate in the galactic plane (e.g. the solar systems ecliptic plane is inclined about 60 degrees from the galactic plane, and we have now observed enough other planetary systems to know that isn't uncommon), then it's likely that some of the pulsars we can see are spinning approximately in the galactic plane, and that some are not. But given there are many more random orientations that are not on an axis perpendicular to the galactic plane, it's probable that most of the ones we can observe from earth are nearly perpendicular to the galactic plane, and will thus be visible throughout most of the galaxy. As we travel around the galaxy within the vicinity of the galactic plane, the pulsars we can see from any given point will be those that spin on an axis nearly perpendicular to the galactic plane, plus some smaller number at other orientations that happen to have an axis of rotation approximately perpendicular to a line between that point and the pulsar.

      --
      make imaginary.friends COUNT=100 VISIBLE=false
    7. Re:Visibility is an issue by mrsquid0 · · Score: 2

      The rotation axes of stars, and thus pulsars, are randomly distributed. There is no correlation with the Galactic Plane.

      --
      Just because you are paranoid does not mean that no-one is out to get you.
    8. Re:Visibility is an issue by gstrickler · · Score: 3, Informative

      The earth's tilt and the solar ecliptic plane don't have anything to do with our ability to view pulsars in/near the galactic plane. What would affect it is the solar system's distance from the galactic plane, and by galactic standards, that's pretty small.

      What is relevant is the axis of rotation of the pulsar, the angular height of it's beam, it's distance from us, and it's distance from the galactic plane (and any intervening matter than might obscure it). Again, what's probable is that most of the ones we see have an axis of rotation approximately perpendicular to the galactic plane, such that their beam is "approximately in the galactic plane", giving visibility to that pulsar from most stars near the galactic plane. The larger the angular height of the beam, and the more distant the pulsar, the farther outside a perfect "perpendicular line of sight" the pulsar will be visible.

      --
      make imaginary.friends COUNT=100 VISIBLE=false
    9. Re:Visibility is an issue by gstrickler · · Score: 2

      No, but a pulsar's axis of rotation will be based primarily upon it's progenitor star's axis. The blast may alter it somewhat, but the angular momentum of the star and it's axis of spin are likely to survive largely as they were prior to the SN.

      And as I stated before, our solar ecliptic plane's angle to the galactic plane has ZERO effect on the pulsar's we can see. Nothing at all.

      What matters are exactly the items in my previous post (that you seem to have ignored).

      --
      make imaginary.friends COUNT=100 VISIBLE=false
  2. Really old idea by GryMor · · Score: 5, Informative

    This has been in use in sci-fi since the dawn of space opera. It gained sufficient use that it was internalized to the point that it's rarely mentioned anymore, you could even say it's why most sci-fi expects a reliable knowledge of location and date even in the face of miss-folds and unplanned time travel.

    --
    Realities just a bunch of bits.
    1. Re:Really old idea by jouassou · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Alcubierre drives are also all over sci-fi. I would still get mighty impressed if someone actually made one.

  3. Re:Too Late. by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 5, Informative

    I assume you took this prior art as inspiration? (Incidentally, I also tend to recall Sagan mentioning pulsars in the first episode of Cosmos being once believed to be a form of alien navigation. Guess that's why he and Drake put them on the plaque.)

    --
    Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
  4. Re:Take Jersey Shore with you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Take Jersey Shore with you

  5. Prior art by hawguy · · Score: 4, Informative
    1. Re:Prior art by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I think its awesome that while we had to build a GPS constellation for earth, the Universe has naturally provided a system usable for precision guidance for interstellar travel. Science is fucking awesome.

    2. Re:Prior art by thogard · · Score: 2

      5 km should be trivial. Less than 10 meters should be doable using consumer grade hardware.

      Pulsar emission areas have been mapped to about 2 meters according to some research out of Australia using radio telescopes. If they can map an emission source to 2 meters several light years away, then I'm thinking they should be able to get positions better than 10 meters when combining things. Another way to look at is that 2 m is about 6 ft which is about 6 nano-light-seconds. The trick is to adjust a clock tick to a known pulsar spin but a similar problem was solved with psedoranges with NavStar.

      Many modern GPS receivers already have special circuits or software to help remove the pulsar noise from the RF signals.

      The big problem with using pulsars is the scary sums that have to be calculated. Most modern GPS devices use a Kalman filter that take into account a high order polar polynomial that has factors such as sun's gravity change, as well as orbital wobbles involving Juniper and Saturn. For pulsars you have to have all of those combined with things that are near each pulsars and your local neighborhood. For our uses I think a 70 terms should about cover it.

  6. Re:Too Late. by busyqth · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yes. I patented that plaque.

  7. Re:Too Late. by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

    They were. A pulsar signal is a repeating pulse - a characteristic previously thought to be unique to artificially generated transmissions, perhaps a beacon of some purpose. It must have been quite a letdown when someone worked out a natural process that could generate such a signal.

  8. pulsars versus star tracking by backslashdot · · Score: 2

    How do we know a pulsar's period cannot change over millenia? I mean all sorts of things can change a pulsars period .. collision with a red dwarf for one.

    Isn't it easier, and far more accurate to use the regular stars? There are billions of them .. many of which have known rotational periods, brightness variability, and proper motions that can be detected via doppler shifts and other means. The Hipparchos satellite produced a fairly accurate 3D map of the neighborhood .. that can be a good starting point. Every star has it's own spectrographic and brightness variation signature .. Sure black swan events may change a stars spectrum, variability cycle, and other things .. but there are a billions stars .. a spacecraft can navigate by tracking just a few million of them (a wide field gigapixel camera and few spectrographic telescopes, should be all it needs) .. its extremely unlikely that more than a few percent of them will change enough to cause navigational errors .. just update the star tables every 10,000 years .. normal GPS has to it that way more often with satellites.

    1. Re:pulsars versus star tracking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      How do we know a pulsar's period cannot change over millenia? I mean all sorts of things can change a pulsars period .. collision with a red dwarf for one.

      The periods of pulsars do increase, in a well-measured way, as they age. (Collision with another random star is so nonsensically rare that I doubt it has happened to a single pulsar in the history of our galaxy.) The periods of regular stars also change, but in less well-measured ways, because we know their periods so much less precisely. We can measure the time of arrival of a pulsar pulse to accuracy of less than a microsecond, which gives us a positional accuracy (timing error times the speed of light) of a few hundred metres. A regular star, we can identify the stage of its rotation to an accuracy of ... maybe an hour? Positional accuracy: a billion kilometres.

  9. Second star to the right;straight on till morning! by D4C5CE · · Score: 2
    Oblig http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Star_Trek_VI:_The_Undiscovered_Country#Dialogue:

    Chekov: Course heading, Captain?
    Kirk: Second star to the right... and straight on till morning.

    ...i.e. his final orders, quoting Peter Pan.

  10. Re:Take Jersey Shore with you by SteveFoerster · · Score: 2

    Are you nuts? Do you want the aliens to come destroy us in response to such an obvious act of war?

    --
    Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
  11. prior art by Tastecicles · · Score: 2

    the Voyagers (and Pioneer 10 & 11) have plaques depicting the origin solar system in relation to contemporary pulsar events and the centre of the Galaxy.

    --
    Operation Guillotine is in effect.