Slashdot Mirror


Healthcare Reform Act Prediction Market

An anonymous reader writes "The Wisconsin School of Business is running a prediction market study on the U.S. Supreme Court's decision on the Healthcare Reform Act. By participating you will not only be helping university students, you will also get to express your opinion and compete with others to show that you have the most accurate prediction."

5 of 185 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Sooo... basically, nothing. by Hatta · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Market forces won't work if there's no incentive to be right. It's tempting for ideologues to sign up and just vote the way they want it to go, instead of the way they think it will go.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  2. Re:Sooo... basically, nothing. by geekoid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There is no such thing.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  3. Re:Sooo... basically, nothing. by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Of course there is: An activist judge is a judge that makes a ruling which creates a precedent I don't like.

    It was "Judicial Activism" when the court ruled that the 14th Amendment applied to Teh Gays, and it'll be the same if they rule that the Commerce Clause can't be used to justify literally anything.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  4. Re:Sooo... basically, nothing. by JesseMcDonald · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Of course there is: An activist judge is a judge that makes a ruling which creates a precedent I don't like.

    Funny, but no. An activist judge is one that makes a ruling which creates a precedent which conflicts with prior rulings regarding the same laws at the same or higher level within the judiciary. In other words, one who rewrites well-established precedents.

    Sometimes activism is a good thing; the older precedent may well be flawed. However, it is not something to be undertaken lightly. It creates uncertainty and undermines the accumulated legitimacy of the court, as the conflict implies that at least one of the rulings—and any others based on it—was in error.

    --
    "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat
  5. Re:Sooo... basically, nothing. by Qzukk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They rolled back the commerce clause when they nullified the Gun Ban in "school zones" by telling Congress they stretched the definition of commerce too far. They also rolled it back some when they said Congress can not force states to create storage facilities to dispose of nuclear fuel.

    And then they went and blew whatever gains they had made by declaring that pot grown in your own backyard for your own personal use is interstate commerce.

    --
    If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.