Slashdot Mirror


One Third of Telcom Staff More Productive Working From Home

Qedward writes "British telecoms operator O2 has found that 88% of its staff are just as productive working remotely, while one-third claimed that they actually got more work done when they worked from home. 3,000 employees at O2's head office took part in a program that had them to work from home for one day, as practice for problems that may occur during the Olympic Games. From the article: '“The success of O2’s experiment extends much further than just allowing some of the workforce to stay at home and work. It proves that with the right thinking and planning, even the largest organizations can protect themselves from the most severe disruptions to their business,” said Ben Dowd, business director at O2.'"

27 of 109 comments (clear)

  1. Keep the pjs on? by Johnny+Mister · · Score: 2

    from the keep-the-pjs-on dept.

    Wait, what? Why would anyone wear clothes at their own home? It's much nicer to be naked. And no, that you have a significant other to care about isn't a valid answer. None of my hot girlfriends have ever had problems with me being nude around them, and I'm a quite fat guy too.

    1. Re:Keep the pjs on? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      None of my hot girlfriends have ever had problems with me being nude around them

      That's because your sample size is zero.

    2. Re:Keep the pjs on? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I wasn't suggesting that you can't be nude around your significant other. I was suggesting that you, as a slashdotter, have not had a hot girlfriend :-p

    3. Re:Keep the pjs on? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I wear clothes instead of turning the heating on. I may be poor....

    4. Re:Keep the pjs on? by mark-t · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How about because one has a significant other who actually dislikes always having the blinds closed?

    5. Re:Keep the pjs on? by mark-t · · Score: 5, Funny

      ... or a young and playful pet cat thinking that one's dangley bits look like cool toys and lunge for them while one is standing at the kitchen counter making one's own breakfast.

      For reference, speaking from experience here, it's approximately as uncomfortable as it sounds.... and also something that one's significant other is liable to keep laughing at you over for about a week.

    6. Re:Keep the pjs on? by cpu6502 · · Score: 4, Informative

      See the Seinfeld episode about "good naked" versus "bad naked".

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    7. Re:Keep the pjs on? by Ignacio · · Score: 2

      grab it by the head and flick quickly

      ...

      I can't see that being any more comfortable for my dangly bits than the claws...

  2. "Telecommuting" still taboo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Managers badmouth telecommuting because it more or less proves what we've known all along. Most managers are useless, redundant, wastes of space that spend more time putting on a show to justify their own existence than they do conducting actual management.

    1. Re:"Telecommuting" still taboo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Managers do serve some purpose. Where I work we haven't had one for over a year now - resulting in us having to put up with all of the political bullshit that goes on in the organisation and also getting rail-roaded despite objections to the idiotic ideas coming down from the Cxx types. Managers also sign off on budgets, performance reviews, salary reviews, etc., so guess what else hasn't been happening? Pretty soon our organisation will come down to give us more work and find nobody there because we're all slowly getting jobs elsewhere.

    2. Re:"Telecommuting" still taboo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's why I said most. You need one good manager. Not 10 bad ones.
      I stand by my statement that /most/ managers in American business culture are redundant.

      Unfortunately bad management is often a self-perpetuating malignancy. Those with power aren't going to eliminate their own positions under any circumstances.

      Unfortunately I envision the future of American business as feedback loop of middle managers, un-trackable N'th layer outsource subcontracts, and HR departments. Eventually the last actual producer will be eliminated, and all companies will suddenly collapse as they unknowingly try to subcontract services, supplies, and products from themselves.

    3. Re:"Telecommuting" still taboo by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 5, Interesting

      They're not all totally useless. I accidentally became one for a while and didn't realize it until a friend pointed it out. I griped that I'd been busting my ass all week juggling work schedules, project priorities, placating clients, liaising between subcontractors and government agencies, ensuring that my group had enough work to keep them busy, handling exceptions, training, etc. but I hadn't produced anything. "Dude, you're a manger."

      A good manager does the annoying crap that's necessary to keep his/her group running smoothly.

    4. Re:"Telecommuting" still taboo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      A manger!? Here!? We don't take too kindly to your types around here...

    5. Re:"Telecommuting" still taboo by rtb61 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A 'bad' manager does the annoying crap. A good manager enjoys the varied trouble shooting they do every day, dealing with problem clients, calming upset employees, reorientating upper managements ideas into something workable and basically planing ahead sufficiently well to make themselves redundant (others always create problems to make that goal impossible).

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    6. Re:"Telecommuting" still taboo by Ryanrule · · Score: 2

      There was an episode of dilbert where The Company outsourced their call center to themselves.

    7. Re:"Telecommuting" still taboo by Tom · · Score: 2

      resulting in us having to put up with all of the political bullshit that goes on

      Most of it goes on because of managers. Granted, in that game, if you're the only group without one, you are disadvantaged.

      Yes, managers have their place. However, theirs is a job that is stuck in the 18th century. Much of it should be handled by specialists or group consensus. It is high time that we redefine the job of management, but of course that won't happen anytime soon because it would be managers who'd have to introduce the new concepts... ...and it would turn out that most of them should be let go because they don't have any relevant skills.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  3. One whole day. by The+Living+Fractal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seriously, what is one day? The novelty of working from home would wear off after about a week and then what? I know what. You'd find me 'working' in my underwear, covered in fried chicken with several empty margarita glasses about me. My e-mails would show a very noticeable trend in typos from about noon onward...

    --
    I do not respond to cowards. Especially anonymous ones.
    1. Re:One whole day. by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 2

      I thought of the one day effect too, but if you're going to drink at home while working, keep your work typo free! It's an honor code.

      Illustrative xkcd
      http://xkcd.com/323/

      --
      My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  4. Reduces pollution too by cpu6502 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Keeping workers at home saves ~10 gallons of gas per person per week. Which is 200 fewer pounds per person per week of CO2.

    --
    My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    1. Re:Reduces pollution too by SwedishPenguin · · Score: 4, Informative

      From Wikipedia: 2 C8H18 + 25 O2 -> 16 CO2 + 18 H2O
      Carbon is about 12 standard atomic weights, hydrogen about 1 and oxygen about 16, so 228 atomic weights of gasoline and 800 atomic weights of oxygen results in 704 atomic weights of CO2 and 324 atomic weights of water. Sounds about right to me when you take into account a few additives to the gasoline.

      (IAMNAC)

  5. makes sense by ozduo · · Score: 2

    the more time they goof off at home the less mistakes they make

    --
    I got to the chocolate box before you, that's why the hard ones have teeth marks.
  6. Companies are starting to listen by wynterwynd · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I work in first-line management for a major telecom and this idea is really starting to take hold. And it's everything I imagined it would be.

    If you aren't directly managing employees and/or it isn't necessary for you to have physical access to equipment, there is no reason why working from home won't work. My boss and all my team are scattered all over the country, we've never met each other face to face. All my meetings are over the phone and via web conference. Nothing requires that I be anywhere near an office, just that I have a quiet place with telephone and high-speed internet access.

    We recently switched to allowing telecommuting 2-3 days a week. And let me tell you, it is Glorious. Those 2-3 days are the most productive ones I have, maybe because I'm comfortable and able to clearly think through issues, instead of being constantly interrupted by the asshole across the cube farm's ringtone or the loudmouth Sales guy on a call next cube over or a million other irritations at the office. And as far as the time-worn fears of slacking are concerned, honestly I have too much to do to slack off - any supervising manager would be able to tell pretty quickly whether or not their subordinates are abusing the privilege.

    Now, this clearly won't work for everyone for obvious reasons - IT support staff, hardware maintenance, client/customer support, supervising managers; you can't really cash in on this goodness. But if you don't deal with face-to-face interactions and your work is mostly conducted electronically, there's no reason not to - that is, as long as you can easily get to the office should the need come up or should your environment prove disruptive.

    Some people do abuse the shit out of it - I wanted to strangle the lady who was watching her kids while hosting a call; the kid was yelling and she was goo-goo talking to him and it was just grossly unprofessional. But most people who've been working from home have been extremely professional about it - in fact I usually never know who's at home and who's in the office.

    I'm glad to see stories like this - telecommuting has taken tons of stress/aggravation out of my work week and it's had an unfair reputation pinned to it by traditional managers who think it's just too good to be true.

    --
    "Not all who wander are lost" -- JRR Tolkien
    1. Re:Companies are starting to listen by Kjella · · Score: 5, Interesting

      If you aren't directly managing employees and/or it isn't necessary for you to have physical access to equipment, there is no reason why working from home won't work.

      If the people you're supposed to manage aren't at the office either, it hardly matters.

      And as far as the time-worn fears of slacking are concerned, honestly I have too much to do to slack off - any supervising manager would be able to tell pretty quickly whether or not their subordinates are abusing the privilege.

      Just wait until there's a quiet period, you'd be surprised how quickly you get used to not working a full day and/or being able to do everything else in between work. Sure if I was grossly slacking my manager would notice but I've never had a boss yet who knew exactly how hard the assignment he gave me was and even if he did, there's a good variance on whether I've done something similar/exactly like this before and any ad hoc issues that might turn up. Hell, even the same person in the same job changes over time when new versions come that make everything easier or harder. Maybe if I was consistently on the poorer side of his estimates over time, but I'd just as easily wager his expectations would be lowered instead. The effect is less if you're at the office during business hours whether there's much work or not.

      Also there's another effect I've seen, it's cramming as much work as possible into your working days which obviously impacts quality to do as little as possible during your days at home, sending out yesterday's work as today's. The derogatory term for it here in Norway is "gjemmekontor" instead of "hjemmekontor" - literally translated "hiding office" instead of "home office". Oh sure they usually can't be completely unreachable as that would give it away but they're always conveniently running a quick errand or was putting on a washing machine or some other reason for not answering right away. Of course people do some minor personal stuff at work too, but not all day long. Okay so people don't do it during crunch time but it's a way to get "days off" without taking the financial penalty during normal times.

      You don't have to be a slacker to see how the slackers exploit the system. Some people are simply there that they want to deliver an adequate to below average work performance knowing they get an okay pay with a minimum of effort and yet aren't so horrible they'll get fired. And if they put that cleverness into doing their jobs instead of working the system, they'd be very good employees but they don't find there's enough incentive. It's actually very hard to find out whether your employees are really working their best or not. Of course slackers slack at work too, but it's not that enticing there.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  7. Why working at home is both awesome and horrible by toygeek · · Score: 4, Funny

    http://theoatmeal.com/comics/working_home

    All that being said, I work for a virtual call center at home doing tech support for n00bs and the like and I really like it.

  8. Somehwat BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I took a few weeks working from home, leading up to my wife giving birth to our second child. I'm a Staff Software Engineer for a large company, w/ 10 years experience. _I_ was far more productive in those weeks. But my overall productivity? Well, I sure as shit didn't help the new folks out, nearly as much as when I was actually in the office. So yes, local productivity (AKA me) improved. Global productivity, however, is arguable.

  9. I claim I'm more productive at home too by gstrickler · · Score: 2

    Why wouldn't I make that claim?

    Actually, most of the time I claim the opposite, home has too many distractions, I'm usually more productive in the office after 5pm. But I'm also a "night owl", so I'm quite productive at home in the evening until about 1am. Just don't expect me to do any real thinking before 10am.

    --
    make imaginary.friends COUNT=100 VISIBLE=false
  10. Many people ... by PPH · · Score: 2

    ... improve office productivity by staying home.

    I've worked with (and for) a number of people who could markedly improve our organizations efficiency if they'd only promise never to set foot on company property again. Heck, we could even give them a raise and promotion as a part of the deal and we'd still come out ahead.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.