Slashdot Mirror


The First Universal Quantum Network

MrSeb writes "German scientists at the Max Planck Institute of Quantum Optics have created the first 'universal quantum network' that could be feasibly scaled up to become a quantum internet. So far their quantum network only spans two labs spaced 21 meters apart, but the scientists stress that longer distances and multiple nodes are possible. The network's construction is ingenious: Each node is represented by a single rubidium atom, trapped inside a reflective optical cavity. These atoms communicate with each other by emitting a single photon over an optical fiber. Each atom is a quantum bit — a qubit — and the polarization of the photon emitted carries the quantum state of the qubit. The receiving qubit absorbs the photon and takes on the quantum state of the transmitter. Voila: A network of qubits that can send, receive, and store quantum information. In another, probably more exciting test, the emitted photons were actually used to entangle the rubidium atoms."

7 of 156 comments (clear)

  1. Call me when we have instant transfer of data by BenJeremy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'll be impressed when they figure out how to harness entangled particles to achieve instant transfer of information over vast distances.

    Imagine a world with no RF generated, yet completely connected. Better yet... imagine the entire solar system or beyond connected with such a network.

    1. Re:Call me when we have instant transfer of data by Chris+Burke · · Score: 5, Informative

      You're wrong. Quantum entanglement does not allow any information to be transferred faster than light.

      Sitting a million miles away from your partner with your entangled particle, the only thing you know is that you and your distant partner will measure a correlated result from that particle -- a fact you already knew a million years ago when you parted company in your very-nearly-light-speed ship.

      You do not know, and can not control, what the value will be. You do not know if the other person has measured their particle's state or not. Measuring the state destroys the entanglement. All you know after is that the result you got will be correlated with what they get, or got.

      No information transfer is possible.

      However entanglement is useful for other things. Like networks where you can detect if someone snooped on your packets.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
  2. Quantum Internet by pablo_max · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I am no physicist, so I am actually asking seriously to those of you who are.
    As it is already know, particles which are entangled at the quantum level have an instant and equal reaction on one another regardless of distance. Would it not be possible to use this "Quantum Internet" for C from say, a satellite controller a rover on Mars and one on Earth?
    I have heard that it is not really workable, but is that from an engineering prospective or from a laws of physics perspective?

    1. Re:Quantum Internet by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Informative

      When you change the state of one, it changes the state of another. Why could you not just view the state as a way of transferring information?

      Because you can't control the state that it collapses to when you measure it and break the entanglement. You can't tell whether or not the person on the other end has already done this. All you know is that whatever state you measure, they will see a correlated result. Which you already knew; you've learned nothing.

      A useful analogy* -- it's like you and the person you want to "communicate" with put two marbles, one red and one black, into two bags. You randomly pick one, your partner takes the other. You fly apart at 0.9c for a while. Then you look in your bag. It's a red marble. You now "instantly" know that your partner has a black marble -- but you haven't actually communicated anything.

      * It's just an analogy; the fact that it doesn't obey Bell's theorem is immaterial to understanding why you haven't communicated anything.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
  3. Re:iPhone qubit? by DynamoJoe · · Score: 4, Funny

    So "Never", then?

    --
    bah.
  4. Re:I have no idea by jd2112 · · Score: 5, Funny

    It means that traceroute will be able to tell you response times or router addresses but not both.

    --
    Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
  5. Re:I have no idea by Courageous · · Score: 4, Funny

    But you'll have no way of telling whether a video is Goatse or not-Goatse until you watch it and collapse the state vector.

    Ah, Schrodinger's Goatse. Brought to you be the intersection of quantum mechanics and 4chan. Where physics and the dark, underbelly of the internet meet, even brave men fear to tread.