Slashdot Mirror


Posting Photos of Olympics Could Land You In Court

hypnosec writes "With London's summer 2012 games due to take place in the very near future, you'd think that organizers would make more of an effort and persuade people to show more of an interest — yet it appears the complete opposite has happened, with strict guidelines banning athletes from posting photos of themselves on Twitter with products that aren't official Olympics sponsors, as well as prohibiting videos or photos to be taken from the athlete's village. Oh and just for good measure, fans could find themselves barred from sharing videos and photos on Facebook and YouTube of themselves delighting in said Olympics action."

22 of 394 comments (clear)

  1. Another by geekoid · · Score: 5, Insightful

    reason not to watch the Olympics

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:Another by AmiMoJo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Athlete's village

      Posted those years ago. I worked on the fire alarm system for the Athlete's village and took those photos on-site. The system itself is a disaster and totally unsafe.

      Go on, sue me.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:Another by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What do you expect? The entire thing is about monies from advertising.

      While it's nice to actually watch events, bullshit rules surrounding the events being broadcast, and rules like this restricting the fans and athletes are exactly while I'll likely skip the whole thing.

      Here's a case study: want to see how Capitalism can destroy something? Look at the Olympics.

    3. Re:Another by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      For what it's worth, I don't really understand the obsession people have with sports. It's like I've got a kind of colour blindness or something.

      It's the same reason why everyone else doesn't really understand our obsessions with cartoons, comic books, cult TV shows, and video games. Well, almost the same reason, in that we know our obsessions are way more importanter!

    4. Re:Another by dwywit · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Want to change things? Write a letter (NOT a tweet or email, or facebook posting) to the sponsors' PR departments. Say something like "I'm aware that you've paid $BIGNUM for sponsorship and associated exclusive marketing rights, but guess what? I'm not going to watch, and I'm not going to buy your products." Make sure you CC a copy to the IOC, and one to the local broadcaster.
       
      There was, IIRC, an estimate from marketing research that went something along the lines of "one person who actually takes the trouble to complain represents x number of people who are unhappy, but don't take the trouble to complain". If enough people made their views known to the sponsors, LOC and broadcasters, they just might take notice and change their ways.
       
      And pigs might fly, I know.

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
  2. How's that for promoting international cooperation by killfixx · · Score: 5, Interesting

    and goodwill...

    Thank you for hosting the Olympics, now please cower in fear of the copyright police.

    I appreciate the Olympics, but I'm not giving up my rights just because my country is hosting them.

    No thanks.

    --
    "Helping to keep you two steps ahead of the Thought Police!"
  3. I feel sorry for the athletes but... by oraclese · · Score: 5, Insightful

    fuck the olympics. It's become exactly what it isn't supposed to be: a corporate circle-jerk to exploit potential for advertising revenue. The athletes come second, if they are lucky.

  4. My first reaction... by multiben · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...was bullshit. That can't be right. Then I RTFA. Holy shit! Way to go London - bring that Orwellian dream to life!

  5. Dear Olympics Committee by whistlingtony · · Score: 5, Interesting

    !@#$ you. No Really. !@#$ you.

    An event dedicated to showcasing the heights of human athleticism, and you've turned it into a cheap money making operation for yourself. You Suck. I will not be watching the olympics.

    1. Re:Dear Olympics Committee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      It was mostly symbolic

    2. Re:Dear Olympics Committee by JonySuede · · Score: 5, Funny

      my kitten just died at 05:51PM

      --
      Jehovah be praised, Oracle was not selected
  6. Really? by Fishbulb · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Are they completely ignorant of the ubiquity of cameras today? Forget the fact that most of those cameras are attached to something that can easily upload images to the world at large.

    This deserves a flash-mob style constant bombardment of images from the Olympics being uploaded during the games. Even if we get bored to tears of the sheer volume of Olympics photos uploaded, just overwhelm them with the obviousness of their own stupidity.

  7. This 21st Century isn't really starting right. by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can we all just agree it's 1999 again, and have a "do over"?

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
    1. Re:This 21st Century isn't really starting right. by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 5, Funny

      Stop agreeing with me, pedantically.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    2. Re:This 21st Century isn't really starting right. by nebulus4 · · Score: 5, Informative

      So far, my favorite comment on that topic is that the years 1 through 524 also didn't exist in our Western calendar. The numbering we use, usually called "A.D." (for Anno Domini" was devised in the year 525, and wasn't used before that time. Actually, it was hardly used by anyone except a few monks for several centuries after that.

      What difference does it make if it wasn't used back then? It is used now.

      If you're 5 months old, it's your first year on Earth. If you're 1 year and 3 months old, it's your second year on Earth. Year 2000 is the 2000th year. In order for us to say that two millennia have passed the year must end, thus the new millennium starts in 2001. There's no year 0, because it would mean the 0th year of Christ on Earth. Which means he did not exist, ergo BC.

      My other favorite comment on the topic is that today is also the start of a century - the century that starts today and ends 19 April 2112. Every day is the start of a century. So arguing against a popular "start of century" year is basically silly.

      We are talking about Gregorian calendar here. The year doesn't start at April 19. You are free to create whatever system you like, it wouldn't change the Gregorian calendar though. Therefore, it's a silly argument.

      --
      "It would be wrong to refuse to face the fact that everything is fundamentally sick and sad."
  8. The Brits will royally screw this one up methinks. by dryriver · · Score: 5, Interesting

    London 2012 is going to be a farcical affair for start to finish. London traffic is already heavily congested without a major event taking place. With London 2012, its going to be nearly impossible to get around the Capital without getting stuck, stuck, stuck everywhere. Then, there's going to be a ridiculous amount of security all over the Olympics. Thousands of policemen. Helicopters in the sky. Boats out on the Thames. B-sniffing dogs. Biometric (face-recognizing) CCTV cameras anywhere. Then there's the hullaballoo about taking pictures. London 2012 security has been harrassing anyone who takes pictures of Olympics facilities, even from a far distance away (like a Kilometer or Mile), and from public land. Now there's this whole nonsense about only official Olympic sponsors being able to reference the 2012 Olympics, Olympic athletes being banned from tweeting or commenting about the competitions, people watching the Olympics not being allowed to share pictures or videos online. The whole thing is a big, stinking mess before it has even started. Good luck, London. With organizers like these, you'll need it.

    --
    Why did the chicken cross the road? Because Elon Musk put an AI chip in its head.
  9. Fuck 'em! by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They occasionally try to sue business with "Olympic" in their name. It has happened several times here in Washington State, where we have a large chunk of the state called the "Olympic Peninsula", and thus a lot of businesses with "Olympic" in their name. A few years ago they tried to tell some dry cleaner out in Port Angeles (in the Olympic Peninsula) that they could not call themselves the "Olympic Cleaners".

    Fuck 'em.

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
  10. Re:How's that for promoting international cooperat by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What sounds completely insane to me is that UK actually had to create special new laws regarding copyright etc in the context of the Olympics for the benefit of IOC here. Do countries really value their sovereignty so little?

  11. Re:Just like Burning Man by houghi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What has Banksy to say about it? http://thequotesproject.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/brandalism.jpg

    People are taking the piss out of you everyday. They butt into your life, take a cheap shot at you and then disapear. They leer at you from tall buildings and make you feel small. They make flippant comments from buses that imply you're not sexy enough and that all the fun is happening somewhere else. They are on tv making your girlfriend feel inadequate.
    They have access to the most sophisticated technology the world has ever seen and they bully you with it.
    They are the advertisers and they are laughing at you.

    You, however are forbidden to touch them. Trademarks, intellectual property and copyright law mean advertisers can say what they like wherever they like with total impunity.

    Fuck that.

    Any advert in a public space that gives you no choice whether you see it or not is yours.
    It's yours yo take, re-arrange and re-use. You can do whatever you like with it. Asking for permission is like asking to keep a rocj someone just threw at your head.

    Your owe the companies nothing.
    Less then nothing, you especially don't owe them any courtesy. They owe you. They have re-arranged the world to put themselves in front of you. They never asked for your permission, don't even start asking for theirs. //Banksy

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  12. Re:So let's see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    We couldn't give a shit what's in your bag, we just want to get done and go home.

    Some of your coworkers disagree.

  13. Re:So let's see... by PraiseBob · · Score: 5, Informative

    Your honesty is appreciated, but a simple google search reveals a new baggage handler theft ring busted at some airport every few months. So yes, it does happen, and has happened to both me and a friend. It is why I will never check bags again and always carry-on, and in turn directly leads to TSA rage because they take stuff out of my bag and throw it away and berate me for not paying attention to the size of my toiletries.

  14. Re:How's that for promoting international cooperat by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's in TFA:

    "Britain already has a range of legal protections for brands and copyright holders, but the Olympic Games demand their own rules. Since the Sydney Games in 2000, the International Olympic Committee (IOC) has required bidding governments to commit to introducing bespoke legislation to offer a further layer of legal sanction.

    In 2006, accordingly, parliament passed the London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games Act, which, together with the Olympic Symbol (Protection) Act of 1995, offers a special level of protection to the Games and their sponsors over and above that already promised by existing copyright or contract law. A breach of these acts will not only give rise to a civil grievance, but is a criminal offence."

    So far as I can see from a brief glipse at the law in question, it basically amounts to giving police powers to directly enforce whatever rules IOC comes up to. This, in particular, looks like it allows the police to arrest you on the spot if you're wearing a T-shirt with a wrong logo or anything like that.