US Small-Scale Nuclear Reactor Industry Gains Traction In Missouri
trichard writes with this quote from an AP report:
"Ameren Missouri is vying to be the first utility in the country to seek a construction and operating license for a small-scale nuclear reactor, a technology that's appealing to utilities because of the smaller upfront costs and shorter development lead times. The small reactors, about a fourth or less the capacity of full-size nuclear units, are appealing to the nuclear industry because they could be manufactured at a central plant and shipped around the world. By contrast, building nuclear reactors today is a more cumbersome process that must be done largely on site and takes years."
I just love it that Alaska isn't considered 'part of the country'. Maybe we should just go back to being in Russia, although I would prefer Canada myself.
Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
Then if we could only get Mexico to take back Texas, the country would be perfect!
Who isn't considering Alaska part of the country? That plant is only proposed. From Wikipedia:
Toshiba never began the expensive process for approval that is required by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
In other words, no one has yet sought a construction and operating license for a small-scale nuclear reactor yet. TFA is about a company that is, if not at that stage, is certainly under way toward it. Galena's plan is currently stalled.
"None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
I did, and I was smart enough to find a "per-capita" listing/map:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_tax_revenue_by_state
-- SmartAss Midwesterner pwning a East/West-Coaster
Hmmm, trying to find Missouri on the per capita spending on welfare list. Oh, there it is at #37. No surprise the New England dominates the top of the list considering their political drift.