Slashdot Mirror


Whistleblower: NSA Has All of Your Email

mspohr writes with this excerpt from Democracy Now!: "National Security Agency whistleblower William Binney reveals he believes domestic surveillance has become more expansive under President Obama than President George W. Bush. He estimates the NSA has assembled 20 trillion 'transactions' — phone calls, emails and other forms of data — from Americans. This likely includes copies of almost all of the emails sent and received from most people living in the United States. Binney talks about Section 215 of the USA PATRIOT Act and challenges NSA Director Keith Alexander's assertion that the NSA is not intercepting information about U.S. citizens." The parts about National Security Letters in particular are chilling, even though the issue is not new.

6 of 478 comments (clear)

  1. Re:anyone surprised? by stoolpigeon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think the whole Bush/Obama thing is a total distraction - and it works for too many people. It's unfortunate it is in the summary because as I see it what is happening is the that the government is travelling further down the same path - regardless of which party controls which branch. The idea that Obama is better or worse is meaningless, by and large they are exactly the same. And if somehow Romney were to beat Obama in the next election, the largest difference would be the switch in which group was defending and which was attacking the administration -- over the very same actions.

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
  2. Re:anyone surprised? by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The mission was over. Saddam is dead.

    The Iraq war goal was filled. We're still in Afghanistan. Why?

    The truth is, our country has its own "business" that is seperate of who is in office. The puppet in office maintains the gov's business and rarely changes course. Obama said he would close Gitmo. It's still open.

    Obama said he would give us a public option... he lied.

    Republicans play to the religious crazy people. Democrats play to the sane people... the result is the same. Corporations and power rule all, and the policies created have nothing to do with the voters.

  3. Re:anyone surprised? by Alan+R+Light · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Um, Obama only got out because the government of Iraq insisted we get out, and seeing as the US ostensibly invaded Iraq to give the Iraqis self-government, Obama couldn't very well dispute the wishes of that government. I don't give a whole lot of credit to Bush or Obama on that count.

  4. Re:anyone surprised? by Alomex · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you cannot see the flaw in Ron Paul's simplistic solutions I don't know what to say.

    "For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong. ---Henry Louis Mencken

  5. Re:anyone surprised? by Zibodiz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The thing that always bothers me is how people defend BO by comparing him to Bush. You're absolutely right, Bush was an apocalyptic failure. And so is Obama. And so will every president be, who is more concerned with politics or favors than he is with rights (personal, state, foreign international, and any other.)

    Just my $.02 as a Libertarian.

  6. Re:anyone surprised? by SteveFoerster · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've never understood this mentality. Your vote is mind-bogglingly unlikely to make the difference either way. What exactly do you have to lose by actually voting for the candidate you like the best?

    --
    Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org