Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Anonymous, People's Liberation Front Build Anonymous Data-Sharing Site

Posted by timothy on from the for-all-your-library-science-needs dept.

suraj.sun writes with these snippets from an article at Ars Technica: "Hacker group Anonymous and the People's Liberation Front have created a data-sharing site called AnonPaste.tk, meant to host pastes of code and other messages without any moderation or censorship of the information posted. The new site, which uses a free .tk web address, allows users to set a time for the paste to expire. It claims that data is encrypted and decrypted in the browser using 256 bit AES, so the server doesn't see any of the information included in the paste.The site says it's taking donations in the form of WePay or BitCoins. ... AnonPaste is built using open-source software called ZeroBin, created by French developer Sebastien Sauvage. According to Infoweek Sauvage has experience in creating online authentication systems for French banks, suggesting the creator knows a thing or two about encryption of data. Still, on the software's information page, Sauvage reminds potential users that ZeroBin software can not protect against potential Javascript attacks. 'Users still have to trust the server regarding the respect of their privacy,' he says. 'ZeroBin won't protect the users against malicious servers.'"

69 of 137 comments (clear)

  1. .tk, seriously? by jamesbrx · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This site will get it's domain removed faster than I can post this comment. The .tk admins have a long history of blatantly removing anything that might cause trouble, are porn and/or hijacking domains that are popular. Great choice there, indeed.

    1. Re:.tk, seriously? by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 2

      .tks are just frames to another site. So just bookmark the real one if you're concerned about the .tk breaking.

    2. Re:.tk, seriously? by smi.james.th · · Score: 1

      I suspect that it was because .tk is free... If they wanted to pay for a domain, then some Anonymous member would likely have to give up some personal details... (Disclaimer, haven't read TFA so what I said could be complete bull.)

      --
      One thing I know, and that is that I am ignorant...
    3. Re:.tk, seriously? by cloricus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why would they want to take down what may become the most effective honey pot in history?

      --
      I ate your fish.
    4. Re:.tk, seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      They should have set their servers up in Judea.

    5. Re:.tk, seriously? by rs79 · · Score: 1

      I'm a bit leery about .tk too.

      You know, we don't really need to use a domain for this. What's google's DNS server? It probably does have a domain but everyone knows it's 8.8.8.8

      Use a domain by all means. But on the main page put the current IP and make sure the website works with an IP address as well as a domain.

      A good tld to use for a domain like this is .ARPA. They never expire and they're just another TLD. If you own an IP, you have an arpa address you can use for anything you want.

      You can use one in an NS record, but I haven't yet found an icann registrar that will take .arpa as a domain, it says it's invalid (never mind it's the first tld ever)

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    6. Re:.tk, seriously? by Monty+Worm · · Score: 1
      (disclaimer: I am a former employee of Dot.TK)

      The reason most domains get removed from the .tk name space is that they breach the terms and conditions that users supposedly agreed to when signing up. This includes (but probably isn't limited to): Drugs, alcohol, tobacco, sexual content, piracy, and other illegal activities.

      And in an attempt to reply to as many of the points raised in other replies as possible:

      • Most of the hijacked domains were (in the time I was there) taken down after requests by their mainstream counterparts. From what I understand, this is essentially required to hold a trademark to defend it, or delayed legal attempts to regain it may treat it as abandoned.
      • It's a full Registry/ *and* Registrar. If users only want URL forwarding, they can have it. If they want to add A, CNAME, and MX records (IP6 wasn't supported yet when I left, but that was a while back) that's another option. Your own Name Servers? Not a problem.

      Knowing the company, it'll probably remain for a few days, while the traffic builds up. Then it'll be taken down. At which stage, Anonymous will either start a massive hack attack on Dot.tk, or they'll simply create another domain name elsewhere, creating an electronic variant of whack-a-mole (close domain, another opens up)

      --
      ... and today's pet project has ... been discarded for lack of time.
  2. Major Fail: ZeroBin requires the JavaScript by xiando · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I am NOT about to let you or your anonymous friends run JavaScript in my browser. No. That would compromise my security. The idea outlined in the summary sounds good, but the JavaScript-based implementation is bad. EPIC FAIL. Think of the Tor-users! They are not about to let their anonymity go by submitting to the evil JavaScript World Order.

    --
    9/11: Never forget it was a false-flag operation
    1. Re:Major Fail: ZeroBin requires the JavaScript by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 1

      If you are concerned that much about anonymity that you turn off JS when you use Tor you should probably be using the Tor Browser bundle instead to ensure you look just like any other Tor user.

      Also I doubt a Slashdot editor would let a malicious website get into an article link.

    2. Re:Major Fail: ZeroBin requires the JavaScript by e**(i+pi)-1 · · Score: 2

      javascript is the best option. I would trust it more than any other implementation because is a language which by nature open source, i.e. http://www.peoplesliberationfront.net/anonpaste/lib/sjcl.js http://www.peoplesliberationfront.net/anonpaste/lib/base64.js All the encryption is done in the users browser and not on the server and one can see the code. So, download all the source files first, analyze whether there is something strange in the source and then everytime, before using the tool, check whether the source has changed.

      What I do not understand however is for what this could be useful.

    3. Re:Major Fail: ZeroBin requires the JavaScript by allo · · Score: 3, Informative

      you can have only one of them:
      - no client side scripting
      - client side crypting/decrypting

      but do not worry, javascript is sandboxed to the site's context.

    4. Re:Major Fail: ZeroBin requires the JavaScript by Tom · · Score: 3, Informative

      Javascript isn't half as evil as you make it.

      It's main failing is that it sucks for crypto. A quick reference I could dig out:
      http://www.matasano.com/articles/javascript-cryptography/

      Basically, it has several problems, the main one being that where they write "random key" in the "browser" box in their little flowchart it should honestly say "weak pseudo-random key".

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    5. Re:Major Fail: ZeroBin requires the JavaScript by chill · · Score: 1

      Sigh...

      Long reply deleted after I read the entire page you linked to. Saved myself some embarrassment there.

      Thanks for that link. :-)

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
  3. Cool, but... by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...we already have lots of ways to do this. We can encrypt and post to Usenet. We can use extensions like FireGPG to encrypt on post to websites. So why use a system where we place all our trust in the service provider, which is both theoretically risky and has failed in the past:

    http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2007/11/encrypted-e-mai/

    --
    Palm trees and 8
    1. Re:Cool, but... by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      well yeah, but could you provide a one liner url to those?

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:Cool, but... by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      http://blog.getfiregpg.org/2010/06/07/firegpg-discontinued/

    3. Re:Cool, but... by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 1

      Probably not; more like one URL and a decryption key that would be pasted in somewhere. Really though, an extension like FireGPG that provides this capability would be a lot better -- I do not want to trust some server to send me my decryption program every time I want to access a file. This may even be worse than Hushmail, since any of the people who are accessing the file could be targeted; the server could merely flag the data it wants to decrypt, and wait for the first person with that URL to come along and open it.

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    4. Re:Cool, but... by elucido · · Score: 2

      ...we already have lots of ways to do this. We can encrypt and post to Usenet. We can use extensions like FireGPG to encrypt on post to websites. So why use a system where we place all our trust in the service provider, which is both theoretically risky and has failed in the past:

      http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2007/11/encrypted-e-mai/

      Exactly.

      The other problem is it takes specialists to actually use this encryption in the context they are talking about. Anyone with the special skills to have to use this sort of encryption would exercise great caution.

      That website Anonpaste is going to have to have a darknet backend of some sort. It's also going to need a distributed decentralized DNS because governments are going to attack the DNS when they figure out they cannot DDOS the servers.

      Finally these servers have to be protected and secure. The best place to put them would be in bunkers, caves, and other hard to reach places. If they finally got up that satellite dish they were talking about launching then they could use that too.

    5. Re:Cool, but... by elucido · · Score: 2

      Probably not; more like one URL and a decryption key that would be pasted in somewhere. Really though, an extension like FireGPG that provides this capability would be a lot better -- I do not want to trust some server to send me my decryption program every time I want to access a file. This may even be worse than Hushmail, since any of the people who are accessing the file could be targeted; the server could merely flag the data it wants to decrypt, and wait for the first person with that URL to come along and open it.

      If it's a honeypot it's not going to work anyway. But honestly I don't see the PLF offering a honeypot. Anonymous and the PLF are two different entities. PLF are serious and are highly skilled while Anonymous is populated but anybody whether they are serious with skills or just teenagers looking for lulz.

    6. Re:Cool, but... by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      http://blog.getfiregpg.org/2010/06/07/firegpg-discontinued/

    7. Re:Cool, but... by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 1

      when you post a message to usenet, it's like posting an email to any random web server: it provides a way to anyone to register your connection and therefore leave a paper trail, which is then propagated to every usenet server.

      Which is why people use these:

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anonymous_remailer

      --
      Palm trees and 8
  4. Almost as anonymous by Hentes · · Score: 1

    as DDoSing websites.

  5. OHAI, FBI!!!! *waves* by IonOtter · · Score: 1

    Trying another false-flag operation? Going for #Anti-Sec 2?

    --
    [End Of Line]
  6. Server cannot see the data? by Sun · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It claims that data is encrypted and decrypted in the browser using 256 bit AES, so the server doesn't see any of the information included in the paste.

    And where does the key come from? If from the server, then the data is not encrypted at all.

    Shacahr

    1. Re:Server cannot see the data? by Sun · · Score: 3, Informative

      Okay, I take it back. It seems that the reading URL contains the decryption key. That's actually quite nice.

      The key seems to be stored in the in-page bookmark (the part after the "#"), so there is even a chance it won't be available through the server's logs. I have not checked whether it is the client or the server that produces the URL for reference. That might mean a trip to the server after all, but given the design of the rest, there is hope it was done properly after all.

      Shachar

    2. Re:Server cannot see the data? by terrox · · Score: 1

      why wouldn't the # part of the URL be stored in logs? anyone with the URL and anyone looking at the URL history/logs etc can therefore unencrypt the text, this makes no sense to me.

    3. Re:Server cannot see the data? by Sun · · Score: 2

      Because the # part is intended for the local browser. It is not part of the URL sent to the server, it is intended to tell the browser to go to a certain bookmark (anchor, in HTML jargon) inside the page.

      You will notice that if you change just the part after the # and hit "enter", the browser does not refresh the page. That's because it does not think anything changed that is worth notifying the server.

      Shachar

  7. Oh yeah? by Rydia · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well, Anonymous is going to start their OWN pastebin! With hookers! And blackjack!

  8. Re:Isn't "peoples" and "libertarian" together a co by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

    "liberty" and "libertarian" are separate concepts.

  9. Re:Isn't "peoples" and "libertarian" together a co by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

    oh, I thought Palestinians did it!

    the "People's Liberation Front", which no one has ever heard of till now, can be easily mistaken for the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine.

  10. It's like piratepad by elucido · · Score: 1

    It claims that data is encrypted and decrypted in the browser using 256 bit AES, so the server doesn't see any of the information included in the paste.

    And where does the key come from? If from the server, then the data is not encrypted at all.

    Shacahr

    http://beta.piratepad.net/front-page/

    Actually I'd say piratepad is slightly better.

  11. Re:Sounds a lot like nonsense by elucido · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sorry, the whole story doesn't make much sense. If anyone can access the pastebin, then anyone can see its contents, including the server, no matter how encrypted the data is stored on it. If not anyone can access the server then it's not a public pastebin, but an encrypted fileserver and whoever accesses it would need to password first.

    The smart way is just to encrypt your data with PGP or AES and then upload it to piratepad.

    This Anonpaste wont be useful unless you connect to it anonymously. What they are promising is they wont censor your shit if you post something tragic.

  12. There are some problems with it by elucido · · Score: 1

    I suspect that it was because .tk is free... If they wanted to pay for a domain, then some Anonymous member would likely have to give up some personal details... (Disclaimer, haven't read TFA so what I said could be complete bull.)

    But since they aren't giving us detailed technical specifications we "experts" cannot check it to determine what those problems might be. I'd like to discuss the technical specifications but I would think something like this would have to be set up with a special protocol and decentralized DNS. I would expect it to be on the darknet.

    1. Re:There are some problems with it by spydir31 · · Score: 4, Informative

      It runs on ZeroBin, which uses client side javascript to generate a random 256bit AES key, then compress and encrypt the text before sending it to the server. Comments are also compressed and encrypted. The key is never seen by the server, so the server can't decrypt your data.

      It uses the Stanford Javascript Crypto Library for its AES code, and its codebase is available on github.

      The system is vulnerable to an MITM attack, also a server admin may be able to reveal the poster's identity, but not the post's content

    2. Re:There are some problems with it by Meneth · · Score: 2

      The server operator could modify the javascript it sends to the client, so that the client sends either the key or the plaintext to a place of the operator's choosing.

    3. Re:There are some problems with it by spydir31 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The server operator could modify the javascript it sends to the client, so that the client sends either the key or the plaintext to a place of the operator's choosing.

      That would fall under the same category as MITM in this case. You still need to trust the server (or a server, if you prefer)

      You could move the client side code to a browser addon/extension, but you'd still have the problem of trusting the extension to behave

    4. Re:There are some problems with it by elucido · · Score: 1

      It runs on ZeroBin, which uses client side javascript to generate a random 256bit AES key, then compress and encrypt the text before sending it to the server. Comments are also compressed and encrypted. The key is never seen by the server, so the server can't decrypt your data.

      It uses the Stanford Javascript Crypto Library for its AES code, and its codebase is available on github.

      The system is vulnerable to an MITM attack, also a server admin may be able to reveal the poster's identity, but not the post's content

      Revealing the posters identity is worse than revealing the posters content! That is a huge security hole.

      Also where is the key stored? Expect the government to investigate and interrogate whoever has the keys.

    5. Re:There are some problems with it by friend+function · · Score: 2

      Also where is the key stored? Expect the government to investigate and interrogate whoever has the keys.

      According to the ZeroBin website, the key is not "stored;" it is part of the URL string (which never goes to the server). For example:

      http://sebsauvage.net/paste/?e4af05540340d85a#zLtQuuHWSJgl3z12lIAJy3ZZeyTdC3dVarlGH8R+TZ4=

      You give the link to your friends. The link contains both a paste ID as well as a key. You and your friends' browsers use the key to decrypt the data for the given paste ID.

      Also, there's no inherent reason to distrust Javascript running on an "Anonymous"-run website any more than you'd distrust any other site's Javascript (or pastebin.com's, for example). In any case, the source is open (and if you have the technical ability to analyze it for holes/backdoors/weaknesses, you can).

    6. Re:There are some problems with it by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Hmmmm yes...or javascript? Could be a bookmarklet even.

      Store it locally, so changes can't be made on the fly if the server gets 0wn3d. Individuals who really care can download the known good client from a specific source. Then they have to trust that source, but only once, and can verify their copy both at time of download and at any later date, with a simple hash.

      That removes the need to trust each server using it, and only needing to trust that you got it from a good repo where the code is being actively maintained. At some point you need to trust that the code is being reviewed and someone would eventually catch a trojan version, one way or another.

      However, thats a lot easier with one repo that many people use, than many repos that few use (which is what you have when each instance distributes its own client). Of course, then you get into versions, and updates for each client....

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    7. Re:There are some problems with it by CodeHxr · · Score: 1

      You give the link to your friends. The link contains both a paste ID as well as a key. You and your friends' browsers use the key to decrypt the data for the given paste ID.

      So, anyone that uses it not only has a potential key stored in their browsing history (if they are a newbly-type user), but even more importantly, their ISP has a history URLs requested, which *definitely* has the key posted.

      Granted, the key is random every time and, in theory, the server should be deleting what you posted after the time you specified, but one can't really verify that and we're back to trusting the server again.

    8. Re:There are some problems with it by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Which explains why noscript blocks bookmarklets from working on pages where it isn't allowing scripts. Makes sense.

      Actually, the beginings of this sounds like FireGPG, which I believe is no longer under active development. However, it had an API to be called by scripts on sites that wanted to directly support it...however, it could easily be used by copying text and telling firegpg to decrypt it, or encrypting text with it and pasting it.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
  13. Re:OHAI, FBI!!!! *waves* by elucido · · Score: 2

    Trying another false-flag operation? Going for #Anti-Sec 2?

    It's not that simple although I do see your point considering Sabu was their snitch. I doubt the FBI infiltrated the PLF though. PLF are far more skilled and very much professionals.

    I'll say it again, anyone who actually has a need to use encryption of this sort properly would need specialized skills to begin with. The PLF is not going to provide any sort of training. So basically if you have a need to use this then you already know how to become Anonymous on the internet. If you don't then you shouldn't be using something like this in the first place.

    And no I don't think it's about the FBI because there are intelligence agencies all around the world other than the FBI who wont like this either. It's all the global government agencies that will hate this in general. It's global government agencies vs Anonymous.

  14. If you use AnonPaste you're one of them by elucido · · Score: 3, Interesting

    According to what Pastebin says about Anonpaste just using Anonpaste could mean you have something to hide and if you have something to hide it means you need to be investigated.

    Although Anonymous has used the news of AnonPaste to taunt Pastebin, Vader isn't worried about the popularity of his own site. He does see problems with the general idea of the new paste site though. "Having this new anonymous paste service online will most likely mean that less 'sensitive information' is posted on Pastebin.com, which we like," Vader told Ars, "But we think this new totally anonymous Paste site will be used mainly by people who have something to hide, people who are posting things that really shouldn't be posted. We see no benefit for normal legitimate users to use it over the currently existing paste websites. We are afraid that this site will be bombarded with people's personal information, credit-card details, and things such as child pornography."

    If you use Anonpaste then the governments will claim you're a credit card thief, a child pornography, or a terrorist, because why else would you want to use something like Anonpaste?

    My advice is don't post on Anonpaste. Read Anonpaste but don't post a damn thing. If someone really knows what they are doing they probably don't need Anonpaste but if they somehow did then they weighed the risks already.

    1. Re:If you use AnonPaste you're one of them by sixtyeight · · Score: 1

      If you use Anonpaste then the governments will claim you're a credit card thief, a child pornography, or a terrorist, because why else would you want to use something like Anonpaste?

      Politicians are a lot less quick to use that, "Only criminals demand their right to privacy" routine after a few demands for public strip-searches.

      Interestingly, the political corruption in the U.S. is getting resolved by, of all people, the military.

      --
      The Wolfpack Project: BitCoin + Crowdfunding = Political Accountability
    2. Re:If you use AnonPaste you're one of them by Pubstar · · Score: 1

      Took me a total of 5 seconds to google Anonpaste + ArsTechnica. http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2012/04/anonymous-builds-its-own-pastebin-like-site.ars Seriously, would it have been that hard to search for?

    3. Re:If you use AnonPaste you're one of them by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      Not posting that up front is disingenuous at best and why should I work to find it when it's something you're pushing?

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    4. Re:If you use AnonPaste you're one of them by elucido · · Score: 1

      Not very long ago some people came under investigation for not having a mobile phone, or not taking their mobile phone into a meeting, meaning they couldn't be tracked. This was considered to be highly suspicious behavior and probably illegal. Soon, it will be mandatory for all new cars in the States to have black box data recorders to monitor all their movements in real time. What could possibly go wrong with that? And the next step? Probably sometime soon, people like you, elucido, will decide that it's fine for the government to surgically implant GPS trackers in everyone's heads. Why wouldn't you want them to be able to track you, after all, if you have nothing to hide?

      I don't make those types of decisions. In fact I don't decide any of this. Don't try to pin the blame on me.

    5. Re:If you use AnonPaste you're one of them by Pubstar · · Score: 1

      Go check usernames. I was not the parent, I merely looking at the quote he used, specifically the 'Vader told Ars' part, and took a wild stab in the dark that it was ArsTechnica... you know, since they refer to themselves as Ars in their articles.

  15. Monty Python teaming up with Anonymous? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Would that be the Peoples Liberation front of Judea or the Judean Peoples Liberation Front?

  16. Only a contradiction in US-speak.... by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 2

    Only in the US has the word "libertarian" been co-opted by the free-market uber alles, Ayn Rand worshiping, "I've got mine so fuck you!" crowd.

    In the rest of the world, the word "libertarianism" is quite similar in meaning to "anarchism". In fact, many anarchists (including Noam Chomsky) use the term "libertarian socialism" to describe their philosophy, as the term "anarchism" has been tainted with connotations of rioting, looting, burning police cars, and punk-rock wannabees.

    --
    Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
    1. Re:Only a contradiction in US-speak.... by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 2

      Only in the US has the word "libertarian" been co-opted by the free-market uber alles, Ayn Rand worshiping, "I've got mine so fuck you!" crowd.

      As one of Kim Stanley Robinson's characters put it, "That's libertarians for you -- anarchists who want police protection from their slaves."

      The typical usage in the U.S. is different because right-wong people opposed to the regulation of big business tried to steal the term in the 1950s. They've managed to bamboozle a lot of folks over the years, but more and more Americans are coming to realize that "libertarian capitalism" reduces in the end to nothing but plutocracy: a state powerful enough to create and enforce so-called "property rights" on the behalf of capitalists, but not to put any leash on those capitalist's exploitation of people or the planet.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
  17. still a problem by allo · · Score: 1

    where does the decrypting code come from?

    lets assume an attacker has the server under his control. he will not only be able to modify the scripts to send the content of the decrypted paste back, he can even send the entered password to the server.

    so its still more insecure than crypting off-browser and pasting it then. But better an encryption, which is secure most the time, than no attempt at all. You can just not guarantee, it will be encrypted or safe. So do not use it, if you know better. But encourage people who have the options to use it or do not encrypt at all, to use it.

    1. Re:still a problem by iserlohn · · Score: 1

      Actually, a much more secure version of this is https://ezcrypt.it/ with which the decryption key can also be further encrypted with a password.

      --
      :. Ultimate Control Dedicated/VM Servers
    2. Re:still a problem by allo · · Score: 1

      as long as its done by javascript, which comes from this site, they may replace the javascript with a logging version. so you cannot win without using a trusted program (which should be installed locally, so nobody can secretly replace it).

  18. WTF? by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

    I thought most of anonymous was in prison after that last big bust a month or two ago. Didn't even know they were still operating.

  19. Don't You Mean... by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

    ... the Judean People's Front?

  20. Typical Anonymous by sixtyeight · · Score: 1

    Can someone please tell me what's supposed to be so politically edgy about creating yet another disordered, unregulated system?

    That kind of jumbling and lack of accountability is pretty much the problem with our political system, and yet Anonymous sells it as subversive and avant-garde. It's not.

    Then when you ask Anonymous what it thinks it's trying to accomplish, rather than sending you a sheaf of redacted government memos they just tell you, "There is no such thing as Anonymous." If life were a party, Anonymous would be the geeky attention-seeking teen off in the corner snorting handfuls of GHB.

    It'd be nice if groups "there's no such thing as" didn't make headlines so often. I can't take them seriously.

    --
    The Wolfpack Project: BitCoin + Crowdfunding = Political Accountability
    1. Re:Typical Anonymous by sixtyeight · · Score: 1

      The problem is that the people in the political system want to force the rest of us to be always accountable, while they themselves keeping the luxury of unaccountability.

      We appear to be using two different definitions of "accountability".

      People used to be accountable to themselves and each other - and through them, the law. If you violated rights, you had to make amends or become an outlaw. Laws were made to uphold standards of rights and values that people had in common - they were a formalized system of basic human decency.

      In time, the representatives we delegated to maintain that system turned the concept of "accountability" on its ear, pretending that they, as public officials, were entities in and of themselves - with an agenda all their own. So today, people often think of "accountability" only in their redefined, bastardized usage: accountability to the whimsical edicts of legislators. But this is the idea of accountability being made to stand on its' head. There is no accountability without self-accountability, just as there is no control without self-control. The idea of being held accountable to an arbitrary, whimsical system is the idea of being accountable to a non-system - in other words, arbitrary edicts and mandates from authority figures. Slavery. In this modern usage, "accountability" doesn't mean anything valid. It becomes a socially acceptable substitute for "slavery", and I'm not using it that way because it would be rather bizarre and unconscionable. I mean real, legitimate, true accountability.

      Anonymous is about levelling the playing field: Allow everyone, not just those in the political system, to be unaccountable.

      Chaos is just as much a threat to rights as tyranny. Is that not self-evident to you?

      It's like they're people who are tired of freezing, and so they set themselves on fire. Spectacular, but utterly useless.

      Groups like Anonymous seem to get quite a kick out of thumbing their noses at the authority figures in the room. If only they'd realize that as members of We, the People, we are the authority figures, and the politicians are required to be our representatives, they could start reasserting a legitimate, functional society. And they'd realize that doesn't happen by adopting the position of the incorrigible adolescent truant; it takes people actively being functional human beings. That's the only way you get a functional society.

      --
      The Wolfpack Project: BitCoin + Crowdfunding = Political Accountability
    2. Re:Typical Anonymous by sixtyeight · · Score: 1

      Don't you have a facebook wall to go post on?

      Touché, sir. You cut me to the quick.

      Can someone please tell me what's supposed to be so politically edgy about creating yet another disordered, unregulated system?

      Explain your sig then:

      The Wolfpack Project [bit.ly]: BitCoin + Crowdfunding = Political Accountability

      Certainly. Which word gave you difficulty?

      --
      The Wolfpack Project: BitCoin + Crowdfunding = Political Accountability
  21. Re:Isn't "peoples" and "libertarian" together a co by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

    Go see "Life of Brian."
    SPLITTER!

  22. URL by kangsterizer · · Score: 2

    Make sure you don't put the URL that matter in the article!
    That could be thousand of ads prints for missed !

    The link is http://www.anonpaste.tk/

    1. Re:URL by kangsterizer · · Score: 1

      And that's the "real" URL http://www.peoplesliberationfront.net/anonpaste/

  23. Wait... by flibbidyfloo · · Score: 1

    Is it the Judean People's Liberation Front, or the People's Liberation Front of Judea?

  24. Woao. by sebsauvage · · Score: 3, Informative

    Woao. My name on the front page of Slashdot. Now I can die. :-D

    If you don't trust AnonPaste, you can just install ZeroBin (the opensource software AnonPaste is based on) on your own website.

  25. And don't forget Wikileaks' connections, please by sgt_doom · · Score: 1
    And lest anyone forgets, because it's supposed to drag out forever, Anna Ardin (a k a Anna Bernardin), the accuser of Wikileaks' Julian Assange, worked for (and may still work for them) the Bonnier family through one of their tabloids, while the two sisters of Claes Borgstrom (one of the two partners of the law firm representing Anna Ardin in trying to get Assange extradited to Sweden) work for the Bonnier family, and Thomas Bodstrom (the other partner of that law firm, who was the Justice Minister of Sweden who colluded with the American CIA to extreme rendition to innocent Arab-Swedes, later exonerated in court) publishes through the Bonnier family.

    Oh yeah....and presently Thomas Bodstrom and family are living a short drive from the CIA's HQ in Northern Virginia, USA.

    1. Re:And don't forget Wikileaks' connections, please by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      And Assange works for RT, Russia's state-owned Putin-controlled Fox News equivalent.

      It might be best to ignore the figureheads, and concentrate on the content.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  26. Sounds great. by caluml · · Score: 1

    Sounds great.

    Now, how can I be sure that the Javascript executing in my browser, a:. isn't malicious, and b:, hasn't been intercepted and changed by someone in the middle?

    --
    Get your own free personal location tracker
  27. Ca y est Seb ! Tu y es !! by lexa1979 · · Score: 1

    Congratulation Sebastien for finally making it on Slashdot !! Ca ne te fait pas l'effet d'un gateau d'anniversaire ? Au plaisir de continuer à te lire via shaarli ;0)

  28. Re:OHAI, FBI!!!! *waves* by squiggleslash · · Score: 2

    I knew that this was a false flag operation as soon as I saw Anonymous was teaming up with the People's Liberation Front, and not the Liberation Front of the People. Splitters!

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.