Slashdot Mirror


Planetary Resources Confirms Plan To Mine Asteroids

Matching widespread predictions, The Bad Astronomer writes with word that "The private company Planetary Resources has announced that it plans to mine asteroids for water, air, and even precious metals in the next few years. Your initial reaction may be to snicker a bit, but it's headed by Peter Diamandis — who established the X Prize — has several ex-NASA personnel running the engineering, and also has the backing of a half-dozen or so billionaires. So this is no joke — their plan looks solid, and may very well be the first step in establishing a permanent human presence in space."

9 of 500 comments (clear)

  1. What could possibly go wrong? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hopefully they'll be very careful about bringing asteroids into Earth orbit. But the energy and mining industries are pretty safe and responsible right?

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    1. Re:What could possibly go wrong? by Travco · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Trying to teach a pig to sing wastes your time and only annoys the pig"
      Robert A. Heinlein

    2. Re:What could possibly go wrong? by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Be nice if people could explain it without the "fuck off and die" part, though. Or the singing pig comment below mine. I have a general understanding of orbital mechanics being in the space biz and all, but I really don't expect it to be general knowledge even in the geekverse.

    3. Re:What could possibly go wrong? by LateArthurDent · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Be nice if people could explain it without the "fuck off and die" part, though. Or the singing pig comment below mine. I have a general understanding of orbital mechanics being in the space biz and all, but I really don't expect it to be general knowledge even in the geekverse.

      I completely agree with you, and think general politeness goes a long way in making a convincing argument (it doesn't matter how logical and factual your argument is if you've made the other person stop listening to you).

      That said, I think I also understand the frustration that causes people to answer so angrily. We're seeing this anti-technology reaction lately, even among geek circles. Every time somebody tries anything remotely innovative, you see the "whatcouldpossiblygowrong" tag pop up and a bunch of people posting about how this new innovative thing sounds great in theory, but in practice it's going to kill and maim people, and generally make puppies cry.

      Basically, it's not that I expect people to have a general understanding of orbital mechanics here. It's that I expect people who do not have a general understanding of orbital mechanics to assume that those actually involved in the project know what they're doing. It's alright to ask, "is there a danger here, can someone with knowledge in this area explain to me the risks involved?" It's another thing entirely to say, "I hope these guys are being extremely careful, because I see a danger here even though I know absolutely nothing about the field. In addition, I assume the people who are involved in this project to be completely irresponsible people who care nothing about safety."

  2. More valuable if they keep it in space by robot256 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The last article on asteroid mining said it wouldn't be profitable even if the asteroid was 20% gold. That was based on the ludicrous assumption that the material would be brought back to earth. Going to all the effort of capturing and mining an asteroid in space just to get a bunch of air and water seems silly until you look at just how ungodly expensive air and water are *in space*, after launch and storage costs. Producing life support materials in situ is the holy grail of space exploration.

  3. Re:Best of Luck by Sperbels · · Score: 5, Insightful

    These guys aren't even making excuses, they're throwing money down a hole for the lulz.

    The money put forth into space endeavors is NOT packaged up and shot into space. It's spent right here on earth. It employs people here on earth. It uses infrastructure and resources here on earth. It's not being thrown down a hole. Even if they are doing it for lulz, it employs people.

  4. Re:Best of Luck by Baloroth · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yeah, throwing money down a hole for the lulz. Just like space travel always was!

    Seriously, are you so short-sighted that you cannot see how useful mining asteroids for water, air, and eventually precious minerals is? I'll give you a hint: absolutely, 100% vital to the continued development of the human race. This has nothing to do with doing something "for the lulz." It is all about advancing the state of the human race. Not for profit, but because humanity can and should expand. Asteroid mining is one step forwards in our expansion towards other planets, and if we intend to not go extinct, we need to do that. We may not need to now. We may not need to in a hundred years, but we will in a thousand, or a million, and we are only going to get there if we start at some point. Might as well do it now.

    To quote from the article: "[Planetary Resources] want to make sure there are available resources in place to ensure a permanent future in space." Our future, eventually, is in space. Whether from global warming, resource exhaustion, or nuclear war, Earth will eventually not be enough. When that day comes, we will be glad some billionaires chose to spend their money on space expansion, instead of building/buying shiny new toys, or hookers and blow.

    --
    "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
  5. Re:I'll believe it by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Platinum has the advantage of being reasonably intrinsically useful(a brilliant catalyst for a variety of applications(certain fuel cell designs, for one), nice and corrosion resistant, in addition to being pretty and rare); but the price would certainly plummet if supply increased dramatically.

    There are relatively few elements that are genuinely without practical applications(some of the shorter-lived radioactive ones are probably too hot to handle but fade too quickly to be useful industrial or medical emitters); but some get bumped into the status of 'financial instrument with a few esoteric applications' by their scarcity.

  6. Re:just in time by EnsilZah · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Shouldn't you be out feeding the poor or something?