Slashdot Mirror


Code Name, Theming Update Announced For Ubuntu 12.10

benfrog writes "In a blog post, Mark Shuttleworth announced some changes for Ubuntu 12.10 (due in October), including the code name (Quantal Quetzal — no, really) and a theme update. He said, 'That will kick off with a project on typography to make sure we are expressing ourselves with crystal clarity – making the most of Ubuntu’s Light and Medium font weights for a start. And a project on iconography, with the University of Reading, to refine the look of apps and interfaces throughout the platform. It’s amazing how quaint the early releases of Ubuntu look compared to the current style. And we’re only just getting started! In our artistic explorations we want to embrace tessellation as an expression of the part-digital, part-organic nature of Ubuntu.' Some other more meaningful announcements include a focus on the cloud in the server version and the lack of a transition from Upstart to systemd."

5 of 285 comments (clear)

  1. "Quaint" by lostmongoose · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What he calls 'quaint' I call 'usable.'

  2. Re:Finally by Chris+Burke · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My problem with Unity isn't appearance (it's very pretty and slick looking), it's functionality.

    In particular I'd like to single out the scroll bars as an abomination. I'm running Ubuntu Classic and I still can't get away from these fuckers. Not having the scroll bar appear unless I mouse over the little rectangle that appears to the left of where the scroll bar marker would be is god-awful. That the little rectangle appears inside the application window and thus can be obscured by, say, a same-colored selection rectangle (as happens in the file viewer, geeqie image viewer, and plenty of other apps) means I basically have to fucking *guess* where the scroll bar should be.

    Is there an obvious "make scroll bars not retarded" option I'm missing? Is this shit supposed to be good on a tablet? Am I supposed to be glad that my desktop has a tablet interface?

    I'm actually scared of upgrading my friend's desktop to a newer version of Ubuntu. He's computer illiterate and has been using Ubuntu more-or-less fine for several years now, but I know him and while I can tolerate even the most bone-headed of interface (I used old versions of Mentor Graphics for example) this shit is going to drive him insane and he'll stop using it.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  3. Re:unity... by X0563511 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Indeed. I wish they would stop "fixing" what isn't broken. Even KDE is pushing it lately, for me.

    I don't think this is a poison specific to Ubuntu or GNOME, it seems to be everywhere.

    What am I supposed to do? Stop updating? Pretend it's still the last decade?

    It's like everyone's trying to become the Next Big Thing as far as interfaces go, but the hardware is lagging seriously behind (eg, this stuff would be awesome on holographic tablets a-la science fiction games).

    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  4. oops by mirix · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Also, what is the point of the separate x-buntus?
    Why not just apt-get install $other_window_manager, if that is what you want? Why is it a different distro?

    --
    Sent from my PDP-11
  5. Re:Finally by Osgeld · · Score: 5, Insightful

    for me its the install process, the others its 1 disc and its like 90% of what I need already there in record time, debian wants to reach out for every single thing and when you have a shit internet (like I have 1Mbs) just getting a base system installed with a command prompt can turn into a couple hours

    I would rather use debian, I am rather fond of it ... though I would rather just get an os on the machine and go about whatever it was I wanted to do