Slashdot Mirror


World's Largest Digital Camera Project Passes Critical Milestone

An anonymous reader writes in with a link about the progress of one of the coolest astronomy projects around. "A 3.2 billion-pixel digital camera designed by SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory is now one step closer to reality. The Large Synoptic Survey Telescope camera, which will capture the widest, fastest and deepest view of the night sky ever observed, has received 'Critical Decision 1' approval by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to move into the next stage of the project. The Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) will survey the entire visible sky every week, creating an unprecedented public archive of data – about 6 million gigabytes per year, the equivalent of shooting roughly 800,000 images with a regular eight-megapixel digital camera every night, but of much higher quality and scientific value. Its deep and frequent cosmic vistas will help answer critical questions about the nature of dark energy and dark matter and aid studies of near-Earth asteroids, Kuiper belt objects, the structure of our galaxy and many other areas of astronomy and fundamental physics."

8 of 73 comments (clear)

  1. Sad for NASA by treeves · · Score: 4, Insightful

    that DOE is doing this and not NASA.

    --
    ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    1. Re:Sad for NASA by Jeng · · Score: 5, Informative

      It is politically beneficial it for politicians to cut NASA's funding, but other agencies want these projects done so they do it because they actually have the funding to do it.

      So yea, it is sad for NASA, but it's not NASA's fault.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
  2. In LOC, please by Overzeetop · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I hate when articles can't use standard units. Are petabytes, exabytes, zettabytes not really usable yet?

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    1. Re:In LOC, please by RenderSeven · · Score: 5, Funny

      Most people think that 'petabytes' is somehow related to child pornography, 'exabytes' is a skin disease, and 'zettabytes' is a video game character.

  3. Spotting Solar system object by DadLeopard · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I would think that it would also help track down just about everything in the Solar system, when using successive pictures of the same portion of the sky in a "Blinker" box or whatever they use in place of that now. Dark matter is all fine and dandy, but the location and trajectory of Asteroids and comets are of a different degree of importance!

    1. Re:Spotting Solar system object by Jeng · · Score: 5, Funny

      The problem is that even with this camera, if what you are looking at is not illuminated then it will not be visible (think asteroid in shadow of moon).

      So basically the worlds largest digital camera needs the worlds largest camera flash. I would suggest using a low yield nuclear warhead, but there would be a few issues with that.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
  4. All those pixels... by Reasonable+Facsimile · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... just waiting to be dumbed-down with an instagram filter.

  5. Re:Opening the JPEG takes Eternity by MetricT · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm with the group at Vanderbilt developing the storage filesystem for LSST, and it has some interesting challenges.

    1. It requires redundancy at the server, rack, and site level. 2. Both data and metadata have to scale both in volume and in throughput (GB/sec or transactions/sec) separately of each other.
    3. It has to work on the WAN level (GPFS & Lustre don't scale beyond the LAN yet).
    4. It should optionally have HSM functionality so you can offload stuff to tape.
    5. The data must be maintained in perpetuity so researchers years/decades from now can use it.
    6. It must be portable across operating systems so Windows/Mac/Linux/etc users can all access the data.
    7. All of this should be completely transparent to the user.
    8. And it has to be done on the cheap (scientists definition of cheap, not CIO's definition).

    Yeah, it can be (and is) being done. We're already using our filesystem to store 2+PB of data for the CERN CMS-HI experiment on commodity hardware. But I can tell you it is a substantially harder problem than you think.