Cybercriminals Exploit Björk's Biophilia App To Compromise Androids
An anonymous reader writes "The Russians who put out fake versions of Angry Bird Space and Instagram for Android last week have competition. Biophilia, a musical experiment by Bjork into the world of apps, has been ported to Android as a Trojan." Maybe not totally surprising; as the submitter reader continues, "last year at the launch of the app, Bjork was quoted in an interview inviting pirates/hackers to attempt to port her code over from iPhone to other platforms."
Sometimes you get it
There are people who still like Bjork?
would anybody be surprised if this is all part of bjork's art? you know, how letting music into your life can have unintended powerful consequences. as a fan, i think this is right up her alley.
This wasn't supposed to happen!
I think "You have been Björked" will now enter the Android lexicon.
"You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
I'm wondering why it is that the old "Soviet Bloc" countries produce so many hackers/scammers/malware authors? Couldn't these people use their - considerable - coding skills to do something constructive? Like starting a software or IT services company? Or making small casual games for various platforms that are out there? Is there a lack of opportunities in Russia & neighbouring countries? A lack of angel investors or venture capital that could pay for small startups? Or is it a cultural thing that Russian hackers tend to do pretty negative things - like hacking & stealing credit card info - ? If you have the technical skill to create trojans or malware, surely there are other _useful_ things you can build with those skills? Like creating a competitor to Adobe Photoshop, or a watertight security system for banking transactions. ------- I really want to know: What is so attractive about creating trojans, malware & phishing scams with your tech skills. Surely these people wouldn't want their own systems compromised by malicious software? So why do it to others?
Why did the chicken cross the road? Because Elon Musk put an AI chip in its head.
Am I the only one getting tired of this "android trojan/malware of the day" press releases by the anti-virus authors?
Seems more and more like pure astro-turfing for their own products, trying to create a sense of insecurity in the users of the biggest mobile OS just so that they can sell their products.
Most users won't be affected by this malware - the play store won't have it, and most of those that install apps from outside the store are techs who know what they are doing. The few affected will be the usual ones, those who think they can ignore the warning when they allow install from untrusted sources, and then ignore the permissions requested by the app. If you're dumb enough to do that, to install games from a suspicious site, that want to make calls and send SMS, then no anti-virus will save you. And it isn't the OS fault if you choose to ignore all safety precautions and disable all protections.
Bjork was quoted in an interview inviting pirates/hackers to attempt to port her code over from iPhone to other platforms
So will people take this trojan as a reflection of the ethics of all pirates/hackers? Hopefully someone did come through with a legit port of the app.
My webcomic
She might also have been signed with SONY.
The link takes you to Symantec's website - you know, the company that wants to make everyone think they need to buy anti-virus for Android.
Neither the blog post on Symantec's website, or the /. summary say whether the Trojan is in any Android app store, which is obviously the most important piece of information. After all, any duffus can sit at home and write (some forms) of Android malware and post it to their website.
The fact that Symantec would post something like this on their website is not a surprise - it's their website they can post what they want. But the fact that it got posted on slashdot....
Stop calling these people "cybercriminals"! Just don't. They are criminals, not androids, robots, AI entities or "cyber" anything.
... cyberstupid.
God, I so hate people labeling everything even remotely related to the Internet as "cyber-".
It's, it's
This was the comeback, how did you enjoy it?
You are all a bunch of idots.
I can't be the only one who thought that "Biophilia" is something you get when you don't use a trojan...
It’s not that weak rule of law lowers the cost of crime, it also raises the cost of legitimate business.
If you build a large permanent business powerful interest will try to expropriate your profits. Bureaucrats will demand bribes to do their job, Tax inspectors will find violations in the opaque tax code unless the right politicians are paid off, etc.
Better to invest is something light and cheap. First, it’s harder to find. Second, when the "Rent Seekers" come they will only find a empty shell – and thus you can move on to the next operation.
The correct spelling is "Björk" and you can only pronounce it correctly when you have hiccups.
Who the fuck is Bjork? This story assumes I know and care about stuff I don't.
What the fuck is Google, and how can I possibly find out about stuff in approximately 5 seconds rather than whining about it on slashdot?
To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it