Slashdot Mirror


Trimble To Acquire Google SketchUp

yoink! writes "It looks like Google is selling off SketchUp or, conversely, Trimble is acquiring it. Despite several indications there will continue to be a free version of the 3D modelling software, users are unsure about what this will mean for the SketchUp community at large as indicated by the comments on the official Google SketchUp Blog post. They are, however, rejoicing that they will be freed from Groups for SketchUp discussions."

25 of 92 comments (clear)

  1. This really sucks by EvilBudMan · · Score: 3, Informative

    Enough said if true.

    1. Re:This really sucks by Jeng · · Score: 5, Informative

      At the time Sketch-up made sense for creating 3D content for Google Earth.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    2. Re:This really sucks by wiedzmin · · Score: 2

      And how did that change now? Did I miss something, or has all the content has already been created? :)

      --
      Bow before me, for I am root.
    3. Re:This really sucks by tbird81 · · Score: 2

      Good for you. What exactly is your point?

  2. Another affirmation of Google narrowing its vision by siphonophore · · Score: 3, Insightful

    To the detriment of all of us

    --
    Dance like you're hurt, Love like you need money, and work when somebody's watching.
    -Scott Adams
  3. Taking all bets! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Who wants to guess how long it'll take before Trimble decides to nix the free version? (or perhaps to move basic tools into the non-free pro version)

    1. Re:Taking all bets! by Overzeetop · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In 6 months, the free version will become a viewer.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  4. Re:Another affirmation of Google narrowing its vis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Another affirmation that lifetime of any Google service is always in question.

  5. Now Google can focus more... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now Google can focus more on copying Facebook and iOS.

  6. Re:Another affirmation of Google narrowing its vis by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 3, Insightful

    learn the lesson!

    don't ever depend on 'cloud things'. and google is a cloud thing maker (heh).

    to invest time and learning in things that can be taken away with almost no notice is lunacy.

    one of these days, I expect to see a google service removed several days before its even launched.

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  7. oops by Reverand+Dave · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is exactly right. There is no guaranteed lifespan for any google app. It's best to not get too attached to any one of them.

    --
    I got here through a series of tubes
    1. Re:oops by Reverand+Dave · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That sounds incredibly lazy and unsecure. I hope your company doesn't handle sensitive information. I'd love to outsource all of my administrative tasks too, but as it turns out I don't want a 3rd party vendor, especially one with questionable privacy practices, to control my information or that of my customers. So, good luck with that.

      Your statement however does not refute my statement that there is no guaranteed lifespan for any google app and any one could be dropped at any time with minimal notice.

      --
      I got here through a series of tubes
    2. Re:oops by Dishevel · · Score: 2

      What is the guaranteed life span of exchange?
      What I have is secure. Usable. Easy for the users and fully exportable to a competitor.
      It is cost effective, powerful and scalable.
      I have full control of who can share what type of date with whom. I enforce strong passwords and two factor authentication.
      I am more sure that Google employees are not snooping through my corporate emails than I am that some pissed off employee will cost us.
      I think you just really hate Google and can see no reason for anyone(in your world view) to use them.
      They are a tool. For the size and type of data and users I administer they are a great fit.
      I am sure though that with your incredible skills that with no information on my company you can decide much better for us than we can.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
  8. Has Google made any profit out of this? by billcarson · · Score: 2

    SketchUp was an acquired start-up. Is there any data present that would let us see if Google paid more for the acquisition than it gets now?

    1. Re:Has Google made any profit out of this? by Yvan256 · · Score: 2

      I don't see why anyone would have anything against MBAs. They're thin, lightweight and have a dual-core Intel Core i5!

  9. Same reason google wanted it. by pavon · · Score: 2

    Google bought it so users would have a free easy-to-use tool to contribute to Google Maps/Earth. A GPS provider would also want free work to improve the 3D structures in their maps.

  10. If it doesn't have ads, it's outta here. by Animats · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is Google concentrating on their core business area - ads. If it doesn't have ads on it, it's going.

    What does Google have left that doesn't have ads, or collects data on users to support ads?

    1. Re:If it doesn't have ads, it's outta here. by ottothecow · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Picasa--although I think that maintaining its status as competition to iphoto is key to keeping people using picasa web albums and certainly new enhancements point towards pushing user content onto Google+

      --
      Bottles.
    2. Re:If it doesn't have ads, it's outta here. by kllrnohj · · Score: 2

      This is Google concentrating on their core business area - ads. If it doesn't have ads on it, it's going.

      What does Google have left that doesn't have ads, or collects data on users to support ads?

      Android, Chrome, iGoogle, Bookmarks, Play (store, music, etc..), News, Picasa, Earth, Docs, Calendar, Talk, Translate, Sites, Groups, Blogger, Reader, Finance

      Some of those arguably collect data to support ads, but most don't.

  11. Re:Selling a 3D modeling program to GPS provider? by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 2

    To make GIS data acquisition more intuitive to a wider audience. That part isn't all bad. I can easily imagine a total station with SketchUp integrated. This could compete favorably with 3D scanners and working from point clouds for interior surveys.

    Great for Trimble and some of their potential customers... We'll have to see on everyone else.

  12. Sketchup is an awesome tool for set designers by dmatos · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I volunteer at a local community theatre, fulfilling a wide range of different roles from time to time. Recently, I worked as a Technical Director for a production, which included the necessity of doing the set design.

    Previously, another enterprising TD had created a Sketchup model of the interior of our back-box theatre space, and used that to do set designs. Let me tell you, apart from some annoying UI issues (trying to convert 2-D input into 3-D input), Sketchup is absolutely fantastic for designing and visualizing different sets and audience creation. I highly recommend it to anyone out there for creating 3-D models of their sets, once the 2-D sketches are completed.

    --

    It may look like I'm doing nothing, but I'm actively waiting for my problems to go away.
    --Scott Adams
  13. Re:Another affirmation of Google narrowing its vis by gorzek · · Score: 5, Informative

    SketchUp isn't cloud-based, moron.

  14. A possible bright point by Grayhand · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There's always been a massive price difference between the pro and standard version, $500 and free. The pro version looks like fun but it's way over priced. Cut it in half and I think a lot more would consider it. Google was mostly feeding off designers that are software challenged so they were able to keep the price high because they really didn't care if it sold or not since the focus was the free consumer version. I think they'll be in for an ugly surprise if they try to charge for Sketch Up the basic version so I doubt that's in the works. I'd expect fewer upgrades and more versions with the pricing being more distributed between the free standard version and hopefully a cheaper pro version.

    1. Re:A possible bright point by tangent · · Score: 2

      $500 is not expensive for 3D software, and it's more than fair for what you get:

      • Additional 2D and 3D exporters and importers - Plugins for these tend to cost $50+ per format for other packages. (Examples: 1, 2.) And, that's without getting into CAD loaders which are often much more expensive.

      • Dynamic component creation - If this were a plugin, I'd expect to pay $50-100 for it.

      • LayOut - This addition to the package obsoleted a $300 Illustrator plugin I used to use to achieve the same end.

      • Direct Support - This might justify the price for you all by itself. I have a support contract for one of SketchUp's competitors that runs me more than $500, and it's charged each year.

      The past few upgrades have been cheap, too, at $95. 30-50% of the original cost per upgrade is more common.

      As for your speculation on price reduction and increased package granularity, I don't see that happening. The only such change we've seen in the past 6 years was due to Google's purchase of @Last, which gave us the free version. Google subsidized that on the back of Google Earth subs and ad revenue from Maps. I'd be worried about the free version going away, if it weren't for reassurances in the press release saying they'll keep offering it. Instead, it makes me wonder where the subsidy will come from now. Maybe Trimble will also be purchasing Google Earth.

  15. People, this is good news! by Faraday's+Sloth · · Score: 3, Informative

    I have a fairly good clue of what's going on since the company I work for (Tekla) got recently acquired by Trimble. Except for long term roadmap, they've pretty much left us alone (at least it seems that way to us programmers). Trimble wants to create a competetive vertical solution in the construction industry to compete with Autodesk's toolchain. Autodesk pretty much dominates the construction industry, and their ecosystem is proprietary and closed. The counterbalance to this is a developing toolchain of tools built around the IFC format which is standardized and open. Trimble already had most of the other pieces in a complete architect-to-the-construction yard toolchain except for an archictecture software, and now they have it. This means, there is now true competition in the construction segment offering information tools, and not only Autodesk and Autodesk. This sort of competition is good, people.At least so far the non-Autodesk parties try to break their dominant position with collaborative tools and an open format. Of course, what the situation will be in the future? Who knows.