Slashdot Mirror


MIT Researchers Invent 'Super Glass'

redletterdave writes "On Thursday, researchers at MIT announced a breakthrough in glass-making technology, which basically involves a new way to create surface textures on glass to eliminate all of the drawbacks of glass, including unwanted reflections and glare. The research team wanted to build glass that could be adaptable to any environment: Their 'multifunctional' glass is not only crystal clear, but it also causes water droplets to bounce right off its surface, 'like tiny rubber balls.' The glass is self-cleaning, anti-reflective, and superhydrophobic. The invention has countless applications, including TV screens, as well as smartphone and tablet displays that benefit from the self-cleaning ability of the glass by resisting moisture and contamination by sweat."

50 of 199 comments (clear)

  1. Not so perfect by BagOBones · · Score: 5, Funny

    But can you build a whale tank with it?

    --
    EA David Gardner -"... but the consumers have proven that actually what they want is fun."
    1. Re:Not so perfect by JoeDuncan · · Score: 5, Funny

      No. You need transparent aluminum for that.

    2. Re:Not so perfect by Saija · · Score: 2

      and a pc with dragon naturally speaking...

      --
      Slashdot ya no es que lo era! ;)
    3. Re:Not so perfect by k31bang · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yeah, we got that as well. I think it's called Aluminium oxynitride. $15 a square inch. Fun stuff. ;-)

      --
      -+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+ *** http://www.mountainfort.com *** +-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-
    4. Re:Not so perfect by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 2

      If it is as agressive as the Discworld Hydrophobes you could use it as a propellant. Make a tiny hole and the water will be expelled at extreme speeds, giving the vessel a high speed in the oposite direction.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    5. Re:Not so perfect by RobertLTux · · Score: 2

      its a startrek reference (Voyage Home??) oh btw i think you meant Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds not Latter day Saints

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
  2. Eliminates *all* the drawbacks to glass? by GoodNewsJimDotCom · · Score: 5, Insightful

    To me, it sounds like a very bold claim to eliminate all the drawbacks from anything. Maybe you made it a little bit better. But I don't think there is anything in this universe that you can eliminate all the drawbacks. I mean even eliminating a drawback tends to make a new drawback. Lets say you made glass so durable that it wouldn't fracture when hit with a hammer, then you might not want to use that glass in an emergency box which says,"In case of emergency, smash glass"

    1. Re:Eliminates *all* the drawbacks to glass? by interkin3tic · · Score: 4, Funny

      Lets say you made glass so durable that it wouldn't fracture when hit with a hammer, then you might not want to use that glass in an emergency box which says,"In case of emergency, smash glass"

      That would only be a drawback if this new "super" glass, when synthesized, automatically replaces all existing glass. Or somehow makes it impossible to make regular glass. Also, most of those have been replaced with "OPEN in the case of emergency." Like as in the fire extinguisher is behind a door and you can just open it. Much less dramatic, which is, I suppose, a drawback. You'll still look like a hero putting out the fire, but without blood dripping down your arm while doing so, you'll lose a bit of heroicness.

    2. Re:Eliminates *all* the drawbacks to glass? by wickedskaman · · Score: 2

      Aww, that was nice! *hug* :)

      --
      Sand's overrated... it's just tiny little rocks.
    3. Re:Eliminates *all* the drawbacks to glass? by dumuzi · · Score: 5, Funny

      And I would run into my patio door far more often. Damn clean glass.

    4. Re:Eliminates *all* the drawbacks to glass? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      From the summery

      Is that like springy, wintery or autumny?

    5. Re:Eliminates *all* the drawbacks to glass? by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 4, Funny

      And I would run into my patio door far more often. Damn clean glass.

      Yes, but your face wouldn't leave a greasy smear.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  3. Vehicle Use? by teknoviking · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you could incorporate this in vehicles windshields, you'd have the same benefits and maybe not need mechanical wipers or defrosters.

    1. Re:Vehicle Use? by ChatHuant · · Score: 2

      If you could incorporate this in vehicles windshields, you'd have the same benefits

      I don't know - windshields are made of tempered and laminated glass, which doesn't shatter on impact (it contains a layer of plastic bonded between two sheets of glass; this layer keeps pieces together so you get spider web cracking instead of pieces falling off) and which breaks in small chunks (as opposed to sharp shards flying all over the place). To temper glass you have to treat it with heat, which may destroy the surface cones the MIT process describes.

    2. Re:Vehicle Use? by PPH · · Score: 5, Funny

      No wipers? This is sure to run afoul of the powerful Brotherhood of Parking Lot Leaflet Stuffers union. BoPLLS will be drafting model legislation to ban its use.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    3. Re:Vehicle Use? by slippyblade · · Score: 3, Informative

      Ever tried to break windshield glass? It doesn't. That's the whole point of windshield glass. If you watch the videos of rescuers pulling folks out through windshields, the windshield itself has been removed or pried to the side. Smashed, crazed, but still in effectively one piece.

    4. Re:Vehicle Use? by tom17 · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's funny, I am used to using rain-x. When it wears and I need to start using the wipers again, I find the huge chunks of metal and rubber whooshing past my face to be very distracting while driving.

      It's all down to what you are used to :)

      Plus Rain-X does a much better job of giving you good visibility in seriously heavy rain (imo).

    5. Re:Vehicle Use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      You mean if they somehow jump over the iron spikes in the front of the car?
      What you mean what iron spikes?

    6. Re:Vehicle Use? by DinDaddy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Easy. Have little sprayers to get them wet just before they strike your windshield.

    7. Re:Vehicle Use? by DinDaddy · · Score: 2

      Great, now we're worrying about murderous film-makers . . .

    8. Re:Vehicle Use? by janimal · · Score: 2

      They don't actually fly through the windshield. They take it with them. It's messy.

    9. Re:Vehicle Use? by mcgrew · · Score: 2

      They're hard to break from the inside, too. I was driving a 1974 Gremlin at 50 mph in 1976 and had a left front tire blow out and was in the wrong lane watching a 3/4 ton pickup truck coming at me doing 70. No seat belt, the steering wheel was bent where I hung on to it, the dash was bent where my shoulder hit it, and my face was swollen badly from hitting the windshield. It didn't break. They're designed to be as hard to break as possible and to be the least dangerous when broken possible.

  4. Forget tablets & phones... by White+Flame · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If this is as hydrophobic as they claim, I want a windshield made of the stuff.

    1. Re:Forget tablets & phones... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hmmm.... Idea - hydrophobic beer bottles.

      Would that even work?

      No, 'cause then *all* of it would squirt out when you pop the top.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:Forget tablets & phones... by idontgno · · Score: 2

      Great for practical jokes, not so great for beer drinking.

      WTF are you talking about? This might be the greatest advancement in human history in hybridizing "beer bong" and "drinking from the fire hose". EVAR.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    3. Re:Forget tablets & phones... by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 2

      you've not lived until you start buying rain-X brand windshield wiper fluid. It amounts to Rain-X that never fades because 'oh, the rain-x seems to have worn off' *press button* 'good to go!'

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
  5. Noooooo by Twinbee · · Score: 3, Interesting

    But then how can we buy new TV sets that actually look glossy and new!

    --
    Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
  6. Sounds Relative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So... does this mean our children will never have the experience of looking out the a window covered in drops of water on a rainy day? I know it's a stupid little thing, but there is something oddly therapeutic and beautiful about it. Almost sad that it might become a thing of the past.

  7. Cool...but a light diode would be neater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What I'd really like to see is a type of glass that is transparent in one direction *ONLY*... regardless of illumination levels.

  8. Re:I can see it now... by CubicleView · · Score: 5, Funny

    They might think they've made a breakthrough with this crystal clear non reflecting glass, but I just don't see it.

  9. Camera front elements by squidflakes · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Wow, glass with those properties being used for front elements on camera lenses would be amazing. Anti-glare without having to resort to all sorts of coatings, no fogging or moisture would be great too, especially if you're shooting in very humid environments.

    As long as the micro-structures on the surface didn't change the optical properties so much as to be detrimental to the incoming light.

    1. Re:Camera front elements by shimage · · Score: 4, Informative

      Wavefronts will reflect off of any surface where there is a change in wave speed. If the lens works as a lens, then it's hard to remove the reflections. Coatings work by reflecting the light back through the lens element (in a manner of speaking), so it still works well. If I understand the article correctly, some lab at MIT came up with a surface texture that causes water to bead. Probably the fact that it is very finely textured is the reason that reflections aren't a big problem. That is fine in the same way that matte screens are fine, but this isn't going to work if you want clear pictures. It might be ok on consumer lenses, though.

  10. superhydrophobia by trb · · Score: 5, Funny

    so this glass has really bad rabies?

    1. Re:superhydrophobia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      The joke works just fine, but it requires a degree of literacy to get it. Long ago, "hydrophobia" was the name given to what we now call rabies, as one of the early symptoms of the illness is that the person or animal stops drinking water and slowly becomes dehydrated.

      I would say that superhydrophobia is when you shoot Old Yeller, and he just gets back up, angrier than before. That's when you notice he's wearing a cape.

  11. Re:solar panels by CubicleView · · Score: 2

    I think it's reasonable to assume that worldwide a number of window washers die on the job each year. I would hazard a guess that it would be a statistically significant amount considering the dangers inherent in swinging about on a rope several stories up with a bucket of sudsy water. But I really rather doubt it was much of a motivation for the scientists in MIT.

  12. For comparison... by Twinbee · · Score: 5, Informative

    For comparison with a water droplet (the closer to 180 degrees you get, the closer to a perfect non-wettable/sticky surface you have):

    This new glass (165 degree contact angle)
    The upcoming Neverwet material (160 to 175 degrees)
    Lotus leaf or even some birds' feather (150 degrees)
    Rain-X (110 degrees - car windshield protector)
    Teflon (95-110 degrees - surprisingly low, but then it needs to be tough and heat-proof)
    Car wax (90 degrees)
    Human skin (90 degrees - PDF warning)

    I wonder what the durability of the glass is compared to Neverwet w(which is pervious to solvents, detergents, soap and high pressure water)...

    --
    Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
    1. Re:For comparison... by RivenAleem · · Score: 2

      Are you saying I could switch car wax for Human skin and get the same effect?

  13. magnetic? by incy_webb · · Score: 2

    if they can just find some way to magnetize it we can clean up broken glass with a magnet....

  14. more applications ... by perles · · Score: 2

    It seems to be a good glass to make lenses for telescopes.

  15. If is all as stated..then it has great application by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If is all as stated..then it has great application. Aircraft cockpit windows just for one. I am sure that fighter pilots would love to have clearer visibility ( at least thru the windows itself) while going 700+ mph in rain.

  16. Endless uses include: by TankSpanker04 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Porn-friendly monitors?

  17. That's the Spirit by alien-alien · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Spirit and Opportunity would have benefited greatly from glass that was self cleaning. Would not have needed to wait for Dust Devils and playful Mars Bunnies to clean off the photo cells.

  18. Low-water toilet by bdwoolman · · Score: 2

    The surface sounds perfect to line the inside of a commode. Opaque better than transparent for this application, however. At least IMHO.

    Remember: You saw it on Slashdot before you saw it at the rest stop. w00t

    --
    "No fear. No envy. No meanness." Liam Clancy
  19. Why am I a Slashdot subscriber? by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 2

    Endless uses...

    Porn-friendly monitors?

    Marked +5 Insightful.

    That's why.

  20. Re:Superhydrophobic? by Twinbee · · Score: 3, Informative

    The contact angle of a water droplet has to exceed 150 degrees. This makes it even better at keeping the surface completely dry and dirt free. Plain 'Hydrophobic' is merely more than 90 degrees.

    --
    Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
  21. fragile? by doug141 · · Score: 2

    They put micro-cones on the surface that are 5 times taller than they are wide. Might not stand up to handling or hail.

  22. Red Light cameras 1, drivers 0 by nobaloney · · Score: 2

    Anti-glare, self-cleaning, no reflections. There goes my ability to beat the red-light cameras.

  23. Re:superlipophilic by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 2

    Not if it's texture-based rather than chemistry-based.

  24. Glass that does not transmit heat (much) by WOOFYGOOFY · · Score: 2

    When I was a kid we went to the Corning glass museum in Corning NY. There they had a show room where they displayed all the stuff they could do with glass

    I seem to remember one display in which a flame was applied to one side of a piece of glass and a pot of water was on the other side with a thermometer in it to show the temp was just room temp, despite being subjected to open flame , separated only by that pane of glass.

    I wonder what ever became of that technology and why today it's not in every window in the world . The energy savings would be incredible- most air conditioning- heat or cooling- escapes through your window which has an R value of 2 or in the case of insulated glass unit (IGU) at best an R-value of 8.

    Self cleaing windows save water and that's a Good Thing, but heat blocking glass saves energy and that's a Very Good Thing.

  25. Eyeglasses? by splorp! · · Score: 2

    "The glass is self-cleaning, anti-reflective, and superhydrophobic." This sounds like the perfect glass for eyeglasses.

    --
    Please don't humanize the morons around me. It makes me very uncomfortable.