Slashdot Mirror


NYC Teachers Forbidden To "Friend" Students

betterunixthanunix writes "The New York City Department of Education has issued rules covering student-teacher interactions on social networking websites. Following numerous inappropriate relationships between students and teachers that began on social networking sites, the rules prohibit teachers from communicating with students using their 'personal' accounts, and requires parental consent before students can participate in social networking for educational purposes. The rules also state that teachers have no expectation of privacy online, and that principals and other officials will inspect teachers' profiles. Oddly, the rules do not address communication involving cell phones, which the Department of Education's own investigations have shown to be even more problematic."

6 of 238 comments (clear)

  1. Re:What about parents of students who are teachers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    That was an issued raised here, in Georgia. Apparently you can not prevent parents from friending their children.

  2. Re:What about parents of students who are teachers by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's stated on page 4 of the document, section E, article 1, just after the (a). The provision that communication over personal accounts may not occur between teachers and students is subject to an exception in the case of relatives.

    --
    Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
  3. Re:Freedom by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 3, Informative

    Freedom of Association is nowhere mentioned in the US Constitution. The right mentioned there is Freedom of Assembly.

    The Supreme Court has ruled that such an implied right exists, however there are limits. For example you cannot refuse to sell beer to somebody because you don't like the color of their skin. On the other hand it is permissible for the state to make a law that you can't sell beer to someone who is below a certain age.

  4. Re:no fun by Vancorps · · Score: 3, Informative

    In what world do you live in where teachers in NYC get lifelong healthcare or tenure? They can be "fired" at the drop of a hat simply by not renewing their contract. I have no idea where this image of teachers comes from. Also, pensions don't exist for the majority of new teachers. Most of this information is 20 years out of date.

  5. Re:Good. by justin12345 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Read the WSJ's publication of the actual policy. It essentially prohibits teachers from actively using the internet except in a professionally approved setting, unless they can be certain that their privacy (anonymity) is assured.

    It's not just about Facebook. If you're a teacher and you have a blog (even one you intended to be anonymous) and you students comment on it you could face disciplinary action. The way it's worded even an unauthorized slashdot post could be construed as inappropriate contact if a student posts in the same thread and knows the teacher's handle.

    --
    Cool art gallery, if you're into that sort of thing.
  6. Re:Good. by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 3, Informative

    He's a teacher, not a priest...

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!