Slashdot Mirror


B&N Pulls Linux Format Magazine Over Feature On 'Hacking'

New accepted submitter super_rancid writes that issue 154 of the "UK-based Linux Format magazine was pulled from Barnes and Noble bookstores in the U.S. after featuring an article called 'Learn to Hack'. They used 'hack' in the populist security sense, rather than the traditional sense, and the feature — which they put online — was used to illustrate how poor your server's security is likely to be by breaking into it."

5 of 301 comments (clear)

  1. Read the 1st amendment first. by ElmoGonzo · · Score: 5, Informative

    No it's not. If a government agency had tried to force them to take it down, that would have been a case of infringement. But as a private entity, B&N can decide what to carry in their product line.

  2. B&N could have destroyed Apple by tekrat · · Score: 4, Informative

    If, in the 70's they pulled Esquire Magazine for carrying the article "Secrets of the Little Blue Box", an article that described phone phreaking.

    This inspired Steve Jobs to convince friend Woz to design and build Blue boxes, which eventually lead to the founding of Apple... now the biggest company in the world...

    Apple started from hacker/phreaker roots, and inspired by an article published in a magazine. Just imagine the damage they've done to the future by pulling this Magazine.

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
  3. Re:Populist security sense? by cpu6502 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Exactly!

    I'm a CRACKER not a hacker. Get it right. (No just kidding..... but I should post that on news sites just to see what reaction I get.)

    --
    My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
  4. Re:Populist security sense? by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 4, Informative

    The new rebrand is "Security Researcher". I haven't seen that get culture-broken yet.

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  5. Adjective Building by Venner · · Score: 4, Informative

    Merriam-Webster:
    First known use of PREDOMINATELY: 1594

    Even if its used predominantly in America, it's a good bet predominately didn't originate here.
    "To predominate" is a verb, "predominant" is an adjective. At some point in time, someone built an adjective off of the verb.

    My favorite bit of vestigial English preserved in the colonies -- especially in the midwest -- is "gotten."
    And it's not a colloquialism; it's used in formal American English.
    "What have you gotten?" (obtained) vs. "What have you got?" (possession)

    (There's actually another Americanism in a sentence above. We typically say "off of" while the British say simply "off.")

    --
    A preposition is a terrible thing to end a sentence with.