Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Using Linux To Optimize Skype Traffic

An anonymous reader writes "A security researcher believes that Microsoft has overhauled Skype, with thousands of Linux boxes serving as the 'supernodes' that route calls between users of the voice-over-IP service. Kostya Kortchinsky of Immunity Security 'discovered the Linux supernodes using a Skype probing technique he and colleague Fabrice Desclaux first demonstrated in 2006,' according to Ars Technica. The drastic infrastructure change doesn't affect the peer-to-peer nature of the calls between Skype users."

8 of 396 comments (clear)

  1. End-to-end principle by benedictaddis · · Score: 5, Insightful

    These intermediary nodes are only needed because we've broken the end-to-end principle - the idea that any Internet endpoint can talk to any other. We need to wean ourselves off NAT and start to demand native IPv6.

  2. Re:Eh? This is how Skype works? by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    To gloat over the irony of Microsoft using cheap UNIX boxes for P2P infrastructure. Even in 2012, Microsoft is still the bogeyman here.

    --
    "Sufferin' succotash."
  3. Re:Eh? This is how Skype works? by SplashMyBandit · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well, very appropriate considering Microsoft's position on Linux and Free Software was that they were a "cancer" (their words, not mine). So maybe giving them a ribbing at this news isn't unjustified.

  4. Re:Why So Serious? by TubeSteak · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've never understood why people get all shocked when someone uses a competitor's product when theirs can do the job too. Well, Linux is a better platform for embedded applications, single-purpose servers, etc. It is much more efficient because there's no GUI to drive and only the bare minimum needs to be loaded in memory. Even the kernel can be stripped down to only essential modules, and it can be tweaked for realtime applications.

    Windows servers aren't designed for that.

    Eat your own dog food.
    If Windows Server isn't secure enough or powerful enough to do the job, maybe Microsoft should revisit their design choices.

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  5. Re:No surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is such tripe. These patches are to get it working well on their hypervisor. It's not like they were improving scheduling performance, patching security holes, or implementing drivers. They want Linux to work better running under Windows.

  6. Because it's Microsoft by dan_barrett · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why is this interesting / amusing ?
    Technically using Linux or some other unix as a supernode is fine, probably a better solution than Windows server - but this is Microsoft, the dominant operating system provider; very much the competitor to Linux. they *could* use a competitor's solution but traditionally Microsoft reinvents the wheel rather than do this (see Silverlight, XPS, .NET, Office Open document format, Sync framework for examples)

    Choosing Linux rather than their own OS product for this task seems like bad PR especailly after publicly criticising Linux as an insecure, slow, potentially IP-violating OS platform.
    You may recall they were "caught" using FreeBSD for hotmail after acquiring that service - and eventually migrated it to Windows.

    I'm guessing there will soon be a "WinMin" or Windows server core based platform that hosts this instead of Linux.

  7. Re:And... by ozmanjusri · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So what? Why should the average person care?

    Oddly enough, they shouldn't care because hell has frozen over and Microsoft is using Linux.

    They should care because Microsoft is taking steps to centralise what was a peer-to-peer telephony system. By adding supernodes that they control, they are positioning Skype to transition to a system where everybody's data goes through Microsoft servers rather than direct person to person.

    They're happy to have us discussing Linux because the privacy implications are what they don't want us talking about.

    --
    "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
  8. What's the alternative? by caywen · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Dear Recently Acquired Skype Division:

    Please abandon your entire Linux infrastructure, like, right after you read this. I know the market is hypercompetitive, but we really need you to spend 2 years rebuilding everything from scratch on Windows Server, because if word got out that one of our divisions is using Linux, the slashdot community will go ape shit. In the meanwhile, you'll still be accountable to shareholders for revenue, so figure out how to make money after your service goes down for 2 years. Maybe you can sell chocolate bars or have a bake sale or something.

    Yours,
    Steve Ballmer