Symantec: Religious Sites "Riskier Than Porn For Viruses"

First time accepted submitter kongshem writes "According to Symantec's annual Internet Security Threat Report, religious and ideological websites have far more security threats per infected site than adult/pornographic sites. Why is that? Symantec's theory: 'We hypothesize that this is because pornographic Web site owners already make money from the Internet and, as a result, have a vested interested in keeping their sites malware-free — it's not good for repeat business,'"

Comments

Dawkins/GODSPOT-0DAY

[cognoscentus]

Of course, some would describe religion thus: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viruses_of_the_Mind

Re:Religion

[Anonymous Coward]

Yes, a little reading helps with disinfection, for example:

The Quotations from Chairman Mao

Dialectical and Historical Materialism (Stalin)

These guys had the same ideals as you, eradicate religion from the minds of the feeble people.

Re:JEBUS will protect me!

[idontgno]

Irony: holding a faith-based belief that another's faith-based beliefs are evidence of intellectual inferiority because they're faith-based.