Slashdot Mirror


Jury Rules Google Violated Java Copyright, Google Moves For Mistrial

eldavojohn writes "Details are thin, but the long-covered Oracle v. Google trial has at least partially been decided in favor of Oracle. The jury says Google violated copyrights with Android when it used Java APIs to design the system. Google moved for a mistrial after hearing the incomplete decision. The patent infringement accusations have yet to be ruled upon."

2 of 475 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Time for the Judges ruling? by Jamestos · · Score: 0, Troll

    Open source does not mean it's not copyrightable. In fact, GPL is by definition a restrictive copyright license too. Open source, by definition, just means that - you get the source. It doesn't give you any more rights.

    And Miskaata is right. Google has been abusing tons of laws and people in their road to glory. They have finally coming under review and sanctions for it. Not just in the US, but around the world, including Europe, Australia, South Korea and tons of other countries.

  2. Re:Time for the Judges ruling? by Jamestos · · Score: 0, Troll

    The funny thing is that Google is actively working against privacy settings in browsers so that they would have every means to track users. They use shady tricks that amount to hacking to circumvent browser security. And yet people think Google does no evil? Hilarious.