Slashdot Mirror


Ubuntu Will Soon Ship On 5% of New PCs

An anonymous reader writes with an excerpt from Phoronix: "Chris Kenyon, the VP of sales and business development for Canonical, just spoke this afternoon at the Ubuntu 12.10 Developer Summit about what Canonical does with OEMs and ODMs. He also tossed out some rather interesting numbers about the adoption of Ubuntu Linux. Namely, Ubuntu will ship on 5% of worldwide PC sales with a number of 18 million units annually."

4 of 441 comments (clear)

  1. Finally by Nerdfest · · Score: 5, Interesting

    All i can say is "about time". It's nice to see this happening just before the UEFI change-over as well to help ensure than Microsoft doesn't lock out other OS options, or at least there's a token commercial opposition. I'm not a fan of Canonical's Unity desktop, but I know some people are, and it definitely looks (and acts) better than 'Metro''. Overall, Canonical's timing could have been a bit better, but it could have been worse. Just before the change-over to a questionable version of Windows, and after a couple of fairly major OS X scares is a decent time to get some advertising in place.

    1. Re:Finally by rtfa-troll · · Score: 5, Interesting

      What is sad is how little you seem to know about ARM which has no ASLR except in ICS and it has been found wanting

      • ARM is a processor architecture (well, really an ISA, but let's not confuse the beginners here).
      • ICS is an operating system version.

      • There is no ICS version of ARM.

      • ASLR has often been found wanting. It is not a primary security layer, just a backup defence when the other layers fail.
      • none of these facts are even relevant to the discussion.

      so YES YOU CAN screw the boot sector by simply writing to the correct memory address (which since we are talking hundreds of thousands of identical handsets isn't hard)

      The thing you want to look up is memory protection. This is before we even start discussing the .NET runtime which is what should be providing the protection against hostile code running in user owned memory space on a Microsoft environment, which is what we were discussing.

      I will now just quote part of your post, putting beside each other two different things you said:

      the engineers at Google they are idiots since they are doing the EXACT SAME THING as MSFT? [.....]The ONLY difference between MSFT's version and Google's is that Google has a "dev mode" that will cripple the security

      Ah yes, the engineers at Google are doing the "EXACT" same thing except it's different. Yes. Not "a very similar thing". Not even "the same thing" but "the exact same thing". But different. I think I have a tip for you from a real actor.

      But hey, what can one expect with troll in their name except trolling.

      Given the quality and hilarity of your post; I guess I should take it up full time and not just when people fail to read the article. I thought you guys were professionals.

      --
      =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
  2. i bet what they dont mention is by FudRucker · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ubuntu is only pre-installed on low end PCs in places like Brazil & Mexico, China and other places where the cost of the PC is whittled down so bare-bones low that even OEM MS_Windows installs are cost prohibitive, but you can count on pirated copies being printed up on CDr sold out of disposable alleyway shacks

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
  3. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion