Slashdot Mirror


TSA's mm-Wave Body Scanner Breaks Diabetic Teen's $10K Insulin Pump

OverTheGeicoE writes "Savannah Barry, a Colorado teenager, was returning home from a conference in Salt Lake City. She is a diabetic and wears an insulin pump to control her insulin levels 24/7. She carries documentation of her condition to assist screeners, who usually give her a pat-down search. This time the screeners listened to her story, read her doctor's letter, and forced her to go through a millimeter-wave body scanner anyway. The insulin pump stopped working correctly, and of course, she was subjected to an invasive manual search. 'My life is pretty much in their hands when I go through a body scan with my insulin pump on,' she says. She wants TSA screeners to have more training. Was this a predictable outcome, considering that no one outside TSA has access to millimeter-wave scanners for testing? Would oversight from the FDA or FCC prevent similar incidents from happening in the future?"

40 of 811 comments (clear)

  1. new slogan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    TSA: Nearly killing innocent people, to keep you safe!

    1. Re:new slogan by lgw · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Wasn't there a Cornel (?) study showing that the TSA caused more American deaths (from people deciding driving was better than molestation) than terrorists over a decade?

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    2. Re:new slogan by ganjadude · · Score: 5, Funny

      I prefer

      TSA: bringing more terror to flight than actual terrorists!

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    3. Re:new slogan by jythie · · Score: 5, Informative

      That can be pretty difficult to do with electronics. Any circuit board can act as an antenna, and (apparently) these mm machines sometimes also produce x-rays beyond what one would encounter in normal life, which is what fried the pump.

    4. Re:new slogan by daremonai · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The fears of the many outweigh the needs of the few.

    5. Re:new slogan by Barbara,+not+Barbie · · Score: 5, Informative

      If the insulin pump is that easy to break, surely some blame lies there as well?

      We are talking about something that should be required to withstand basically a lot of punishment, because the owners life depends on it - if subjecting it to a small amount of radiation (and no matter how the TSA likes to get piled on here, their scanners do emit a small amount of radiation in the scheme of things) in the course of a pretty routine activity, then the pumps manufacturer needs to look to resolving that flaw with their equipment.

      First, there was absolutely no need for her to pass through any sort of scanner, as is evidenced by her previous flights, when she produced the documentation and was given a pat-down search instead.

      Second, the circuitry wasn't designed for this sort of radiation, since it's never encountered outside a lab - as even the summary makes clear.

      Third, the scanners routinely emit a lot more radiation than the makers claim.

      --
      Let's call it what it is, Anti-Social Media.
    6. Re:new slogan by Adriax · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How exactly can it be the manufacturer's fault that their product doesn't withstand energy bombardment from a technology that was unknown to them for the entire duration of the product's development?
      That's like trying to blame medieval armorsmiths for not making chainmail protect against tasers.

      --
      I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it!
    7. Re:new slogan by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You have the same odds of being killed on an airplane by a terrorist as you do being killed by cancer from a body scanning device (1 in 30 million):

      http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120405/04390118385/tsa-security-theater-described-one-simple-infographic.shtml

    8. Re:new slogan by berashith · · Score: 5, Funny

      they are relying on that 1 in 30,000,000 person being a terrorist. that way we all win.

    9. Re:new slogan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think you were trying to imply it is senseless to avoid these scanners. However this just goes to point out how stupid the effort to prevent terrorism is. The risk is so low even with 9/11 happening that it make no sense to subject people to ANY kind of screening. People should be able to hop on a plane as easily as they hop in the car and drive to work or hop on the subway, a bus, or any other form of public transport ion which has no screening and lots of people.

      Can jets be used as bombs? Yes. So what! There are lots of other more dangerous problems that we should be investing time and money in solving that should be taking precedent. Like cancer, global warming, and education.

    10. Re:new slogan by geekoid · · Score: 5, Funny

      When I come to work, I sneak liquor in by hiding it in my stomach.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    11. Re:new slogan by kimvette · · Score: 5, Insightful

      People should be able to hop on a plane as easily as they hop in the car and drive to work or hop on the subway, a bus, or any other form of public transport ion which has no screening and lots of people.

      The TSA wants it to be equally easy as well, which is why they are trying to work their way into harassing citizens ("Papiere bitte") on every mode of transportation.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    12. Re:new slogan by Lurker2288 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Type I diabetes is caused by the autoimmune destruction of the pancreatic islet cells which produce insulin. It has nothing to do with corn syrup or the FDA.

    13. Re:new slogan by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 5, Insightful

      She was a teenager used to following orders by people in authority rather than questioning them and advocating for her own self-interests. In other words a model citizen.

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    14. Re:new slogan by dark12222000 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      She's a 16 year old girl, not a constitutional lawyer. Read the article, and engage your brain a bit, before you open your mouth.

    15. Re:new slogan by tburkhol · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not saying that any kind of screening or abrogation of our rights and privileges can be justified. Just not feeling the honor system for flights would work out all that well

      There is a vast middle ground between the invasive grope-and-scan system the TSA uses and the pre-DB Cooper honor system. The ease with which hijackings happened in the 70s-90s was largely due to the explicit policy of complying with hijackers demands. This policy was reversed about the same time the second plane hit the tower and, in combination with locked cockpit doors, pretty well assures that hijacked aircraft will not be effective guided missiles again.

      Instead of making an attempt to balance the cost, inconvenience and, yes, risks of ever more invasive screening procedures, TSA throws up the terrorist bogeyman and tells us that if all this expense saves even one life, then it's all worth it. Events like this one serve to remind us that screening procedures, even those involving minuscule risks, when applied to hundreds of millions of people, cause morbidity. Morbidity that is much more predictable (and therefore more preventable) than terrorists. So, the question is: would you prefer safe magentometer-only screening and a 0.0000001% chance of hijacking, or body scanning, with a 0.0000001% chance of cancer and a 0.00000001% chance of hijacking?

    16. Re:new slogan by Culture20 · · Score: 5, Funny

      You have the same odds of being killed on an airplane by a terrorist as you do being killed by cancer from a body scanning device (1 in 30 million)

      BEDIVERE: So, logically...,
      VILLAGER #1: If... she.. has the same odds of being killed on an airplane by a terrorist as she does being killed by cancer from a body scanning device then she's made of wood
      BEDIVERE: And therefore--?
      VILLAGER #1: The TSA are Terrorists!
      CROWD: Terrorists!
      BEDIVERE: We shall use my largest millimeter wave scanner!

  2. The war on terror is over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The White House just said the war on terror is over.

    We don't need the TSA screeners any more, send them home and stop the unnecessary abuse of U.S. citizens.
     

    1. Re:The war on terror is over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You're forgetting that whenever you give up a right you rarely (if ever) get that right back (re: government).

    2. Re:The war on terror is over by SJHillman · · Score: 5, Informative

      The war on terror will never be over as long as the TSA is around. Radiation bombardment? Groping children? Sounds like Al-qaida has outsourced overseas.

    3. Re:The war on terror is over by ChrisMounce · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The war is over. We lost.

    4. Re:The war on terror is over by freeze128 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No....

      But if your predecessor started to beat me with a lead pipe, and then you stopped the beating, I would vote for you.

    5. Re:The war on terror is over by Chrisq · · Score: 5, Funny

      So, someone can beat you for 8 minutes with a lead pipe, I step in and beat you for 3 then stop. You'd still vote for me?

      tempting. Maybe if you told me that it was to prevent terrorism and protect the children.

  3. forced? by X0563511 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Wait a minute... I think the larger issue here is that they forced her through the scanner.

    Maybe I'm wrong, but is that not improper? I thought they had to allow manual inspection at your request.

    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    1. Re:forced? by Altus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Anything to get a mm wave look at some underage breasts.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    2. Re:forced? by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 5, Informative

      Ummm, go to any beach in Europe and knock yourself out.

      We Americans are diseased in the head in many ways.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    3. Re:forced? by samazon · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This is what I found - http://saizai.com/tsa_rights.pdf - it's a "cheat sheet" of what is legally permissible. Though I haven't been in a situation with TSA like that, I have had (on two separate occasions) doctors "spring" invasive medical exams on me during follow-up visits (a biopsy for a first-time abnormal test result, when standard procedure is three abnormal results... someone wants to charge my insurance company exorbitant lab fees...) and while I have the cojones to tell my doctor he can shove it because I -know- he's doing something wrong, most teenage girls don't (I WAS a teenage girl going through TSA and it IS intimidating). It's tragic, and her little crusade for education is fine, but it doesn't scrape the real issue - which is, of course, daily violations of people's privacy. As Ben said... "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."

      --
      I have the hiccups.
    4. Re:forced? by Svartormr · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ummm, go to any beach in Europe and knock yourself out.

      Very true. But unless you're willing to be groped, irradiated, swim *really* well, or have a lot of bucks for a ship ticket, it's kind of difficult to get to Europe.

  4. EMC compliance by necro81 · · Score: 5, Informative

    FYI: medical products, especially ones that have the potential to kill if they malfunction, have to undergo substantial testing to demonstrate their immunity to electromagnetic interference. This includes stuff like TV, radio, and cellular transmissions, microwave ovens and WiFi. There are also special field frequency/strength combinations, such as the typical medical detector or consumer anti-theft device.

    However, there aren't regulations regarding immunity to mm-wave and THz scanners, and certainly not at the intensities these devices use. I suspect that, if you were to test a broad range of existing medical products, many of them would fail, because many of them have mm-scale electrical features (especially, circuit board traces) that would be highly susceptible.

    1. Re:EMC compliance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      I did RF compliance and sensor design for two insulin pumps. An insulin pump is considered a Class 2 medical device, which means that it is an acceptable to stop delivering insulin and alert the user in case of a failure. The user would then rely on manual delivery until the fault cleared.

      A Class 3 would be required to continue delivering therapy (and announce the error) in a single fault situation. This is reserved for devices where a manual fail-over isn't a safe option.

    2. Re:EMC compliance by DrLang21 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Maybe it's time for the TSA to have their imaging equipment evaluated by the FDA like every other piece of human imaging equipment out there. Or better yet, stop using it.

      --
      I see the glass as full with a FoS of 2.
  5. I would recommend not signing that by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 5, Informative

    I don't know if it is a real petition or not, but what I do know is it is a real SPAM list. Ever since signing it, they've been bombarding me with shit asking for money and their opt out doesn't seem to want to opt out.

    I am more than a little annoyed.

  6. Everytime.. by greywire · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Every time there's a story about the TSA making life unpleasant for Americans, a terrorist gets his wings..

    Congratulations, the terrorists have won.

    --
    -- Senior Software Engineer, Attorney appearance services, locallawyerapp.com.
  7. forensic analysis by hoxford · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I want to see the results of a forensic analysis of the unit to find out why it failed. if the scanner is putting out enough energy to permanently damage the circuits it's a strong argument against the safety of these things.

  8. They didn't force her. by pavon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you read the article the TSA agents advised her that the insulin pump would not be damaged by the scanners, despite a doctors note to the contrary. She took their advice, assuming they knew what they were doing, and chose to go through the scanner rather than requesting a pat-down.

    While her actions are understandable, if she had simply requested a pat-down like the doctor instructed her to do rather than asking for a second opinion, this would have been avoided. Likewise if agents weren't so stupid as to disagree with a doctor's order on a matter they knew nothing about, this would have been avoided. Given their position of authority they should be liable for the cost of the pump since their negligence caused it to be destroyed.

    1. Re:They didn't force her. by kimvette · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, because I do not wish to exchange freedom for apparent security. I want it to be like it was up through the mid-90s: loved ones and friends being able to meet you or see you off right at the gate, children being able to be escorted directly to the gate by their parents, etc.

      You know, LIBERTY.

      I know, only the radical fringe lunatics believe in actual freedom nowadays.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  9. Re:Is she stupid as well? by Overzeetop · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Because she's 16 and away from home, and probably just wants to get back. Quit expecting everyone to have a vigilate chip on their shoulder.

    You know, as adults, we should have already fixed this god damned problem with our government - not expect our children to have to rise up against the man for something as simple and common place as a plane flight.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  10. Murder in the interest of public safety... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Being an insulin dependant diabetic, they could have easily killd her. It could have failed the other way and dumped several days of insulin into her at once. I guess once she passes out, they would have done a body cavity search before calling the paramedics.

    1. Re:Murder in the interest of public safety... by shentino · · Score: 5, Insightful

      She should sue the fuck out of them for starters.

      Passing her machine through the scanner EVEN AFTER a doctor's note said otherwise is grossly negligent or reckless or worse.

  11. Re:Is it possible to just leave? by torkus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yes. By the police.

    TSA agents are not police no matter how much they try to act like them. The real problem is people *need* to fly in many cases. This is a 16 year old girl on her way home - she didn't have the option to cancel a trip because of a bad tsa policy. She's also (in many states at least) too young to drive and definitely too young to rent a car from almost any company. That leaves busses and trains - without advance planning by a minor far from home. She had effectively no choice but to submit to screenings - and THIS is why the fact you cannot refuse TSA/FAA rules on the basis that flying is not a 'need' is utter bullshit.

    --
    You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.