Slashdot Mirror


Warmest 12-Month Period Recorded In US

First time accepted submitter seanzig writes "Dr. Jeff Masters of Weather Underground provides a good overview of the State of the Climate Report from NOAA's National Climatic Data Center (NCDC). May 2011 through Apr. 2012 broke the previous record (Nov. 1999 — Oct. 2000). A number of other interesting records (e.g., warmest March on record) and stats emerged. It just presents the data and does not surmise anything about the causes or what should be done about it."

5 of 297 comments (clear)

  1. wink wink nudge nudge by khipu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It just presents the data and does not surmise anything about the causes or what should be done about it."

    Let me fill in the blanks for you. It's getting warmer because of anthropogenic carbon emissions. And no matter what you think should be done about it, nothing is going to be done about it because people are not going to agree on a common course of action.

    So, better get used to it: it's going to get a lot warmer. But why that may be unpleasant and costly for some, it's not going to be the end of civilization.

  2. Re:Keep it coming! by flaming+error · · Score: 5, Funny

    Way ahead of you. Since 1996 I haven't even eaten veggies.

  3. Re:Good science and hats off to him by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Well, I think there's little disagreement that a "large" fraction is human caused, although obviously some small fraction is natural variation."

    I don't know whether this is disingenuous or you just don't understand.

    The whole reason there even exists controversy about this in the first place, is that the signal is very small in relation to the noise: any human-caused differences are so small in relation to the natural variations that it has been nearly impossible to detect (if, indeed, it has actually been detected).

    "some small fraction is natural..." is not the real situation at all. The problem is the opposite: the vast majority of it is natural. Any scientist, even the staunchest AGW supporter, will admit that if he/she has any pretension to honesty at all.

  4. Re:Gardens like winter. by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 5, Funny

    Unless you have a disease and pest garden

  5. Re:Wonder what Fox News has to say now? by Courageous · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I am personally rather indifferent to the whole GW/AGW affair. That said, it's just silly to infer that extra snow means the globe isn't warming. For example, consider: if 100 billion tons of ice melts at the poles, and global snow levels then increase, in winter, when was the water cooler: 1) when it spent all year round being ice, or 2) when it spends 4 months a year as ice? If you guessed #1, you'd be right.

    Of course, I can ask the question a different way, and just make you mental. If the globe is warming, and the average temperature goes up, would it be possible for the increased water vapor as it traveled across the poles to actually generate an expanding ice sheet? If you agreed that it was possible, you'd be right.

    Now the part that will make you mental is that these two questions imply answers that could be superficially viewed as contradictory. I'm fun at a party, eh?

    C//