Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Pirate Bay Criticizes Anonymous' Attack On Virgin

Posted by timothy on from the leave-that-virgin-alone! dept.

judgecorp writes "Anonymous launched a DDoS attack on Virgin Media, apparently in protest at Virgin's decision to block the Pirate Bay. Now the Pirate Bay has criticized Anonymous, saying it doesn't support DDoS as a form of protest. The statement is interesting, given that Anonymous has been attacking music industry sites and other targets for some years, saying it is in support of the Pirate Bay."

5 of 89 comments (clear)

  1. Bystanders by SJHillman · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'd have to agree with TPB on this - DDoS has a tendency to affect a lot more than just the target. It's using a grenade to take out a single guy on a bus.

    1. Re:Bystanders by neokushan · · Score: 5, Informative

      I think it's less like a grenade and more like a shitload of spitballs. I mean, get hit with enough of those and it's going to be pretty unpleasant, plus a few are bound to miss and hit some other poor sod to the point where he's going to fell grossed out and maybe want to wipe his face a bit. But er....yeah I'm not really sure where I'm going with this analogy but I think the point I'm trying to make is that it's crude, only somewhat effective and those it "harms" aren't really harmed in a particularly dangerous way - it's more an irritant.

      --
      +1 IDisagreeSoHeMustBeATrollOrAnAstroturferOrAShill
    2. Re:Bystanders by tlhIngan · · Score: 4, Informative

      Especially being how Anonymous only do extremely inefficient ICMP flood attack, the least they could do is learn to pull off a DDoS properly.

      That's so ... ancient information. Anonymous and LOIC do NOT do ICMP Echo floods by default anymore. They do HTTP requests. The latest version of LOIC even makes the HTTP requests non-cachable (using various tricks that force a caching service to pass the request upstream so you'd need a really good CDN).

  2. Not Virgin's fault by iB1 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Virgin had no option but to comply with the court order that was issued. If they had ignored it, they would've been fined hundreds of thousands of pounds - probably even more than that.

    I'm not a Virgin Media customer, but I understand that the block is trivial to swerve around, so Virgin Media have obeyed the letter of the law, but haven't made it particularly difficult to get around. Anyhow, DDosing a web-site is just lame.

  3. Re:It's not interesting by bky1701 · · Score: 1, Informative

    The cluelessness is spreading!

    Anonymous is not an organization of any kind. Saying you are anonymous and using anonymous-ish symbolism (which is actually all /b/ in nature) are the modern equivalent of flying a jolly roger. That you can so easily ignore this and say they are "a bunch of cyberthugs" shows you have no idea what you are talking about and really should not be speaking on the matter.

    --
    Great Intellect...