Slashdot Mirror


Only 22% of California 8th Graders Pass National Science Test

bonch writes "22 percent of California eighth-graders passed a national science test, ranking California among the worst in the U.S. according to the 2011 National Assessment of Educational Progress. The test measures knowledge in Earth and space sciences, biology, and basic physics. The states that fared worse than California were Mississippi, Alabama, and a tie between the District of Columbia and Hawaii. 'Nationally, 31 percent of eighth-graders who were tested scored proficient or advanced. Both the national and state scores improved slightly over scores from two years ago, the last time the test was administered.'"

7 of 580 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Makes no sense by dkleinsc · · Score: 4, Informative

    Some relevant data here (per pupil spending):
    US average - $10499
    Alabama - $8870
    California - $9657
    Mississippi - $8075

    You'd be surprised, but California is really not spending a lot on their kids either. The places that are spending a lot:
    DC - $16408
    New Jersey - $16271
    New York - $18126
    Alaska - $15552
    Vermont - $15175

    Source: US Census.

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  2. Re:Makes no sense by Sparticus789 · · Score: 4, Informative

    You are leaving out the fact that untill about a year ago Calironia was actually run by Republicans. With the exception of the bay area and LA, California actually votes republican (not saying Democrats are any better, just pointing out the data).

    Put down the crack pipe. The California state legislature has been Democrat since I can remember. The last time their electoral college went to a Republican was 1988. Schwarzenegger was the Governor, but he was far from being a right-winger and often called a RINO. Except for a small 2 year period, Democrats have controlled the State Senate for years. And LA and the Bay Area make up a majority of the POPULATION of California. Not necessarily the land area.

    --
    sudo make me a sandwich
  3. Re:What's the percentage for Slashdoters? Seriousl by WeirdAlchemy · · Score: 4, Informative
  4. Re:Makes no sense by scubamage · · Score: 5, Informative
    This paragraph is important:

    The exams measure knowledge and understanding of physical, life, Earth and space sciences. Students were asked to identify chemically similar elements on the periodic table, name a function of the human organ system and explain the effects of human land use on wildlife. In California, eighth-grade students are only taught in physical science, not in Earth or space sciences – another reason why they would struggle more, officials said.

    So, basically there isn't a nationally recognized standard for sciences, so the test is really not remotely fair.

  5. Re:Makes no sense by bradley13 · · Score: 5, Informative

    You imply that spending more would help. Let's have a look at the ranks of the states you mention, and add in their rank (by average score on the science exam):

    Alabama $8870 - rank 49
    California $9657 - rank 47
    Mississippi $8075 - rank 50

    DC $16408 - rank 51 (by a *huge* margin)
    New Jersey $16271 - rank 24
    New York $18126 - rank 34
    Alaska $15552 - rank 26
    Vermont $15175 - rank 3

    North Dakota and Montana, with the best results, both spend less than average amounts per pupil.

    There are plenty of studies that show that throwing money at schools does not help. The single best thing you can do to improve most schools is to hire good teachers and fire bad ones. There is a strong *inverse* correlation between states with good education and states with strong teachers' unions. California is a prime example, as is New York (rank 34 on the list).

    --
    Enjoy life! This is not a dress rehearsal.
  6. Re:What's the percentage for Slashdoters? Seriousl by Rahqstar · · Score: 4, Informative
  7. Re:Makes no sense by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 5, Informative

    I call bullshit on the teacher's union correlation. In fact it is the states with the lowest scores that do not have binding collective bargaining.

    Five states do not allow collective bargaining for educators, effectively prohibiting teacher unions.

    Those states and their SAT/ACT rankings are as follows:

    South Carolina â" 50th
    North Carolina â" 49th
    Georgia â" 48th
    Texas â" 47th
    Virginia â" 44th

    http://markcrispinmiller.com/2011/03/5-states-where-teachers-unions-are-illegal-have-the-lowest-test-scores-in-america/

    And in general studies show a small positive correlation.

    http://shankerblog.org/?p=1941

    Of course correlation is not causation, and in this case I really doubt it is a factor either way,

    The only factor that really counts is the economic status of the parents.