Only 22% of California 8th Graders Pass National Science Test

bonch writes "22 percent of California eighth-graders passed a national science test, ranking California among the worst in the U.S. according to the 2011 National Assessment of Educational Progress. The test measures knowledge in Earth and space sciences, biology, and basic physics. The states that fared worse than California were Mississippi, Alabama, and a tie between the District of Columbia and Hawaii. 'Nationally, 31 percent of eighth-graders who were tested scored proficient or advanced. Both the national and state scores improved slightly over scores from two years ago, the last time the test was administered.'"

Comments

Re:Makes no sense

[scubamage]

This paragraph is important:

The exams measure knowledge and understanding of physical, life, Earth and space sciences. Students were asked to identify chemically similar elements on the periodic table, name a function of the human organ system and explain the effects of human land use on wildlife. In California, eighth-grade students are only taught in physical science, not in Earth or space sciences – another reason why they would struggle more, officials said.

So, basically there isn't a nationally recognized standard for sciences, so the test is really not remotely fair.

Re:Makes no sense

[bradley13]

You imply that spending more would help. Let's have a look at the ranks of the states you mention, and add in their rank (by average score on the science exam):

Alabama $8870 - rank 49
California $9657 - rank 47
Mississippi $8075 - rank 50

DC $16408 - rank 51 (by a *huge* margin)
New Jersey $16271 - rank 24
New York $18126 - rank 34
Alaska $15552 - rank 26
Vermont $15175 - rank 3

North Dakota and Montana, with the best results, both spend less than average amounts per pupil.

There are plenty of studies that show that throwing money at schools does not help. The single best thing you can do to improve most schools is to hire good teachers and fire bad ones. There is a strong *inverse* correlation between states with good education and states with strong teachers' unions. California is a prime example, as is New York (rank 34 on the list).

Re:Makes no sense

[the eric conspiracy]

I call bullshit on the teacher's union correlation. In fact it is the states with the lowest scores that do not have binding collective bargaining.

Five states do not allow collective bargaining for educators, effectively prohibiting teacher unions.

Those states and their SAT/ACT rankings are as follows:

South Carolina â" 50th
North Carolina â" 49th
Georgia â" 48th
Texas â" 47th
Virginia â" 44th

http://markcrispinmiller.com/2011/03/5-states-where-teachers-unions-are-illegal-have-the-lowest-test-scores-in-america/

And in general studies show a small positive correlation.

http://shankerblog.org/?p=1941

Of course correlation is not causation, and in this case I really doubt it is a factor either way,

The only factor that really counts is the economic status of the parents.