Senator Seeks More Info On DOJ Location Tracking Practices
Gunkerty Jeb writes "Senator Al Franken (D-MN) is demanding answers to questions about the U.S. Department of Justice practice of gathering data from wireless providers in order to monitor individuals' movements using mobile phone location data. In a letter (PDF) to Attorney General Eric Holder, Franken said, 'I was further concerned to learn that in many cases, these agencies appear to be obtaining precise records of individuals' past and current movements from carriers without first obtaining a warrant for this information. I think that these actions may violate the spirit if not the letter of the Jones decision.'"
The only "decision" these government agencies respect is their own decision that they are more important than everyone else, and therefore completely justified in breaking laws.
Afterall, those laws are meant for those other people, not for them.
The government is huge and opaque and one congressman represents so many people, that most of us have near-zero access to say a thing about it. Sure we can write letters and they'll tally them up and pile them with the rest. Won't change much.
I'd really like to have my congress critters sit and discuss with me why they don't see this as the problem Franken and Paul do.
Because to me, the Constitution is crystal clear, and the feds are breaking the law.
Hi, Canada here...
When you're done with Al could you please send him our way? He seems to be one of the few decent politicians left.
Thanks.
It's on America's tortured brow, That Mickey Mouse has grown up a cow
Al Franken is correct in questioning. This is exactly what a person that represents the "People" should be doing. Sadly, Rand Paul, Al Franken, Ron Paul, and a couple others are in such a minority that we won't hear much about this. Mega Media corps will make sure this does not reach Network News in any form to boot, so what ever Al uncovers will be quickly muted by what ever nonsense they feel will cover up the 5 minute news spot.
We really are at a point where the house needs to be cleaned completely. I think if it started to happen, we'd quickly have a police state. The Government has been gearing up for it at least. We can hope the Military prevents it from happening.
-The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.
When did it change to where the government could get records from a private company about a private individual without a court-issued Warrant?
You don't own the data Google has on you (including your emails, etc.) You don't own your Tweets. That's why that protester couldn't challenge the subpoena the DA served on Twitter. If Google wants to fight to protect their data they have about you, they can (maybe). But you can't, and it's not a violation of your rights for Google to turn over that data, or for the government to go after it without a warrant (it might be a violation of Google's rights).
Ceci n'est pas un sig.