Slashdot Mirror


Forbes Names Microsoft's Steve Ballmer Worst CEO

New submitter _0x783czar writes "Microsoft haters gleefully have latched on to the latest scoop that a Forbes columnist has named Steve Ballmer the worst CEO. It seems that the article has leveled some strong accusations of irresponsible and ineffective business practices; claiming that Microsoft has not progressed over the last 12 years of Ballmer's leadership. (Full disclosure: I'm not a Microsoft fan myself and tend to agree with this piece.)"

4 of 444 comments (clear)

  1. No need to say, "full disclosure". by justin12345 · · Score: 5, Informative

    You don't need to say full disclosure just because you hold an opinion. That phrase is used if you have a vested interest in something. For instance "Full disclosure: I own Microsoft's competitor's stock" or "Full disclosure: I have an ongoing lawsuit with Steve Ballmer, because he allegedly once threw a chair at me".

    --
    Cool art gallery, if you're into that sort of thing.
  2. Re:Worse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    TFA is about CEOs currently holding that position today. The RIM CEOs are gone already.

  3. Re:Worse? by phantomfive · · Score: 5, Informative

    GM would be gone if not for the bail out

    Strictly speaking, it wouldn't be gone, it would have gone through bankruptcy and been reorganized.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  4. Re:Worse? by poopdeville · · Score: 5, Informative

    Microsoft's stock price - while fairly high - has remained constant for ten years, while many of its competitors have seen enormous growth

    It has dropped, in real terms. You forgot about inflation. 100$ was worth more 10 years ago than today.

    --
    After all, I am strangely colored.