Slashdot Mirror


New Firefox For Android Beta Released

Mozilla has announced the availability of a new beta version of Firefox for Android. The release notes list many of the new features and fixes, which include Flash support, improvements to panning and zooming, plugins loading only on touch, and a new "Awesome Screen." They point out that many Android phones are supported, and that a beta version for tablets will be coming soon. Mozilla is asking for help "testing everything from the faster startup and response times to compatibility for specific websites and graphics performance." Here's the download page.

107 comments

  1. Would have been nice to not drop Maemo. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    With all that was held back when the N900 still was supported, it's a shame that it's left out of the fixes.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  2. Don't forget about mobile AdBlock Plus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Best. Feature. Ever.

    1. Re:Don't forget about mobile AdBlock Plus by MachDelta · · Score: 4, Informative

      If your Android is rooted, try AdFree. It's a blacklist for your hosts file to block ad servers from almost any app, not just the browser.

    2. Re:Don't forget about mobile AdBlock Plus by markdavis · · Score: 1

      Yes it is the best feature ever. And the ONLY browser that supports it is Android Firefox. No surprise that there is no support for it in the stock browser. But mysteriously- no support in Dolphin, Chrome, or Opera Android browsers.

      Unfortunately, it appears there is no listed AdBlock Plus addon for this new Firefox beta (yet). It could be that it just hasn't passed compatibility yet.

    3. Re:Don't forget about mobile AdBlock Plus by Calos · · Score: 2

      Better yet, some work is going on for an Android port of Privoxy. Much better control and more robust than IP-based blocking.

      --
      I vote based on politicians' actions, unless contrary to my preconceptions. Often wrong, never uncertain. #iamthe99%
    4. Re:Don't forget about mobile AdBlock Plus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the ONLY browser that supports it is Android Firefox

      No it isn't.

    5. Re:Don't forget about mobile AdBlock Plus by markdavis · · Score: 1

      404 File Not Found
      The requested URL (articles/view/extensions-opera-mobile-labs/) was not found.

      Still, this is interesting if Opera has such an addon. I specifically looked for one last year and found nothing. Meanwhile (April 2012):

      http://my.opera.com/community/forums/topic.dml?id=1372622

      "Are you trying to install an extension? These are currently not supported by Opera Mobile."

      "Opera Mobile's URL Filter file doesn't support ad blocking."

    6. Re:Don't forget about mobile AdBlock Plus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better yet, realize there wouldn't be nearly as many free apps if everyone blocked ads.

    7. Re:Don't forget about mobile AdBlock Plus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or quality TV if everyone went to the kitchen when the ads came on. I see how that works now.

      I block ads. As many ads as I can on all devices that I have. When I surf the web on my friends PC, it is like watching network TV. It is noisy, distracting, and annoying. When I browse on my own PC the web seems like a bit nicer place.

      You will never convince me that watching or listening to ads is for my benefit. If free apps go away, so be it.

    8. Re:Don't forget about mobile AdBlock Plus by spidr_mnky · · Score: 1

      AdFree is effective and simple, and I would recommend it for pretty much anyone, but for more aggressive control I like DroidWall. It's a front end for iptables, and grants network access on a UID basis. Since each app is given a UID, this effectively means it works on a per-app basis, and it lists app names in the interface.

      Fair warning: While whitelisting is a superior strategy to blacklisting, it can bite you by blocking core functionality like updates, and it's not always clear what needs to be unblocked to restore functionality. Fortunately it does logging, so you can turn on logging, perform the action that's not working, and check the log to see what hit the firewall.

      It does entail some work, at least while you're still breaking in your phone, which is why I recommend it only if you're feeling "aggressive". AdFree is easy and practical.

  3. Why? by Threni · · Score: 1, Troll

    They've come to the party extremely late, with a slow bloated competitor for the pretty good stock browser and the excellent Dolphin HD. It would be nice if Firefox for Android supported all the desktop add-ons but no. So..why would I install it over Dolphin?

    1. Re:Why? by sethstorm · · Score: 2

      It would be nice if Firefox for Android supported all the desktop add-ons

      That would heavily depend on the addons being architecture independent.

      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    2. Re:Why? by markdavis · · Score: 1

      Mobile Firefox DOES support most of the desktop add-ons. Apparently not in the beta version yet. I think it just is too new for many to have been tested against it yet, and it might also be because this beta doesn't use the standard Firefox UI... just not sure.

      If it doesn't support AdBlock, then you are right, there is not much reason to use it over something like Dophin, which apparently will never have such support.

    3. Re:Why? by kbrosnan · · Score: 1

      No it does not. Addons need to be re-written for mobile. Jetpack/Addon SDK make this process simpler but it still takes some work.

      --
      These people look deep within my soul and assign me a number based upon the order I joined. -Homer Simpson
    4. Re:Why? by Dynamoo · · Score: 1

      I'm not even going to bother looking at this new version, every time I've tried FF on Android before it has been so slow and unreliable as to be unusable. I really can't see how it is salvageable. If you want something better than the stock browser, the Opera is pretty nice.

      --
      Never email donotemail@WeAreSpammers.com
  4. Didn't you get the memo? Maemo is dead. by OliWarner · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As much as I hate to say it (as a N900 pre-orderer), the N900 is dead. The community is split between fourteen different forks and forks of forks and most of its users seem to have moved on to more popular devices (Android and iOS - I doubt too many bought another Nokia/WP7 after what Nokia did with the N900).

    Anyway all these together make for a rather unwelcoming development platform. You can't blame people for dropping it.

  5. What's special about this version? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They release new Android betas pretty often - there have been half a dozen last year, for example. What makes this version so special that it warrants a /. front page story?

    1. Re:What's special about this version? by markdavis · · Score: 3, Interesting

      >"What makes this version so special that it warrants a /. front page story?"

      Because it is the first Firefox for Android that uses the Android user interface, instead of a totally foreign one. It is a pretty big milestone.

      If they can improve the speed to match (or at least approach) the native Android browser AND support Adblock, I will absolutely use it for 100% of my mobile phone and tablet browsing, like I already do for all my desktops.

    2. Re:What's special about this version? by markdavis · · Score: 1

      >"The native Android browser is slow and crashy so if they haven't even hit that milestone they''re pretty incompetent."

      Not sure what devices you are using, but on my HTC phones and my Xoom tablet, the native Android browser is fast and has never crashed.

    3. Re:What's special about this version? by kwalker · · Score: 1

      This one's available in the Market (Screw you "Play Store"). It means it's an actual Beta, no side-loading required.

      https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=org.mozilla.firefox

      --
      ... And so it comes to this.
    4. Re:What's special about this version? by evilviper · · Score: 3, Informative

      Firefox on android has always been a dog slow, steaming pile of crap. I just downloaded the Beta, and it seems this new version FINALLY isn't... It starts up pretty quick (the old one takes forever) have gotten rid of the nightmare UI elements like scrolling off the left & right sides of the web page to see controls and tabs.

      Plus, Flash support is a big deal, that it should have had from the start.

      I've kept Firefox around as a last resort, because web pages that won't work on any other Android browser, even with the user agent switched to desktop, usually DO work with Firefox, but otherwise, refuse to use it. The latest beta sure cranks down the pain level by leaps and bounds. Unfortunately, almost no ad-ons work for it right now, so I can't test much, and it looks like It's still a long way from something I'd use as my primary mobile browser, but it seems to be a hell of an improvement.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    5. Re:What's special about this version? by CFD339 · · Score: 1

      Agree completely. I've installed it and found it unworkable.

      --
      The problem with quotes on the internet, is that nobody bothers to check their veracity. -- Abraham Lincoln
    6. Re:What's special about this version? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Previous betas have been available in the Market, too. I've had mine for several months, and kept seeing regular update prompts (and installing those updates), hence why I was wondering what's so special about it this time.

      Other posters have clarified that - new UI and Flash support are notable enough, I guess.

    7. Re:What's special about this version? by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      I think you meant this one.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    8. Re:What's special about this version? by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      I benchmarked Firefox versus the stock browser on my Android 2.2 phone about six months ago and Firefox's JavaScript performance was already faster, in addition to doing much better on HTML5/CSS compatibility tests. The stock browser on an Android 3.1 tablet was faster than the same version of Firefox on the same hardware, though. Clearly Google has been steadily improving the Android browser; unfortunately, you have to upgrade the entire OS to get the new browser code, so owners of older handsets are stuck with what they've got.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    9. Re:What's special about this version? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Matching the performance of the stock browser isn't saying much.

      If they can match the performance of Opera Mobile then they might have something. Opera is the first thing I install on any mobile device (I hate Opera for the desktop though; or as I call it "Opera: Crashy Version").

    10. Re:What's special about this version? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been using it on a kindle and galaxy, and the bit I was attracted to was the bookmark and open tabs sync. Unfortunately it never seems to work.

      That and you can't post on Slashdot with it, though I'd wager that's just the shittiness of slashcode.

    11. Re:What's special about this version? by kbrosnan · · Score: 1

      For phone users there is a completely rewritten Java based UI. This results in a much faster startup time and we have Flash support. Two of the largest complaints in the market feedback.

      --
      These people look deep within my soul and assign me a number based upon the order I joined. -Homer Simpson
    12. Re:What's special about this version? by Calos · · Score: 1

      I seem to remember that not all features are being backported, e.g., the ICS version of the browser contains updates and upgrades that older releases will not get.

      But the stock browser is only part of the story (not that I've ever had any real trouble with it), the goalposts moved significantly with Chrome for Android, and others like Dolphin are very good too.

      --
      I vote based on politicians' actions, unless contrary to my preconceptions. Often wrong, never uncertain. #iamthe99%
    13. Re:What's special about this version? by bejiitas_wrath · · Score: 1

      I have a Telstra T Tab tablet and I upgraded it to Android 2.2.2 and installed the flash plugin that was available and it works perfectly with the Dolphin HD browser. I am not sure if other Android devices have this available, but the Telstra tablet has flash support. If only I could get a keyboard to attach to it, then it could be a little laptop.

      --
      liberare massarum ex ignorantia, clausa descendit molestie.
    14. Re:What's special about this version? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The stock browser on my ASUS transformer is slow. It's a tossup between chrome & firefox. I won't mind if the the newer firefox is faster.

    15. Re:What's special about this version? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I finally deleted Firefox Beta in anger, sick of the UI and no flash. I installed the nightly and Aurora instead (They have had these features for a while). I guess I should have just waited a day.

    16. Re:What's special about this version? by Debian+Cabbit · · Score: 0

      Have you tried updating to Android 4.0/Ice Cream Sandwich? the ICS Browser has many enhancements that seems to have been taken from the Android version of Chrome, like tabs. Its been fast and stable for me. If there isn't an OTA update for your tablet, there should be a good rom to use on xda-developers.

      I use ICS Browser+ a browser built on the stock ICS Browser, with added functionality, like the ability to remove the normal menu and use a semi-circular "quick-controls" menu that pops up when you slide your finger in from the left or right side of the screen.

    17. Re:What's special about this version? by kangsterizer · · Score: 2

      This is the Android native version. The old beta was the XUL version.
      It is very different from the last beta in almost all regards.

      XUL:

      - XUL UI
      - Electrolysis (one process per tab and uses a lot of memory)
      - Supports all XUL addons
      - No flash
      - Native as in NDK

      Android Native:

      - Android UI
      - Asynchronous UI and renderer (gecko), much reduced memory footprint with many tabs
      - Flash
      - Native as in Android UI native, Gecko is still using the NDK.
      - Needs specific addons.

    18. Re:What's special about this version? by JanneM · · Score: 1

      On my older 2.2-based phone, Firefox was completely unuseable. Really - clicking something would take more than a second to respond in some cases.

      Same version of the browser on my new Android 4-based phone and it's a joy. It flies. Lately I've used the Aurora nightlies as my default browser for some time to try the new interface and it's really, really good. I abandoned Dolphin completely for Firefox once the new UI appeared. I basically only miss text reflow when zooming; other than that it is already everything I want.

      So takeaway message: it really, really depens on your phone whether your experience will be good or not.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
  6. No Adblock :( by markdavis · · Score: 2

    Ug- unlike the non-beta, this one has no Adblock Plus support (yet). That is the major reason for Android Firefoxt (well, that, and no Google-overlord spying as with the stock and Chrome Android browsers). Hopefully this will come soon.

    Also looks like no tablet support for it yet.

    Also still looks like you have to install an Addon to get it to switch to non-mobile presentation mode. That is annoying and should be built-in.

    1. Re:No Adblock :( by Calos · · Score: 3, Informative

      (well, that, and no Google-overlord spying as with the stock and Chrome Android browsers)

      Out of curiosity, has anyone seen any evidence to back this up, or is it just speculation?

      Not saying I don't understand the cause for concern, but, given the number of people suspicious of anything Google, you'd think someone would have some evidence were it a problem.

      --
      I vote based on politicians' actions, unless contrary to my preconceptions. Often wrong, never uncertain. #iamthe99%
    2. Re:No Adblock :( by markdavis · · Score: 0

      I have seen several reports about tracking with Google browser. And it has face validity (that is how Google does it's thing- for good or bad). Unfortunately, I don't have any such links nor remember any specifics; a result of constant information overload. Hopefully someone else has the info they can share.

    3. Re:No Adblock :( by Calos · · Score: 1

      Well... I try to keep fairly abreast of such things, and have seen nothing about it, save for some initial concerns about Chrome on the desktop. Google pretty quickly addressed those.

      I've seen nothing suspicious show up in my Privoxy logs (when on my WiFi, my phone proxies through my main rig - Privoxy in the market isn't very robust yet). I've run an occasional packet sniffer to find ad hosts for hosts-based blocking on my phone and have seen nothing suspicious.

      Google analytics is baked into SO many websites, and Google has the majority of searches, and if you're using an Android you probably have Google mail anyway. What does Google gain by baking it into the browser as well? Is that marginal benefit greater than the marginal cost?

      I think the answer s "no."

      --
      I vote based on politicians' actions, unless contrary to my preconceptions. Often wrong, never uncertain. #iamthe99%
    4. Re:No Adblock :( by markdavis · · Score: 1

      If you are using the Android browser on a Google Experience device, you are signed into your "account", whether you want to or not. This means that Google knows who you are and that improves their tracking through Adsense. Then combine that with any Gmail use, for which they have 100% control and access, and your contacts that are linked to that account, etc...

    5. Re:No Adblock :( by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The Android browser doesn't send all your private data to Google, but if you use Google services with it then there will be some information leaked. For example if you search via the URL bar then what you type in is sent in realtime to Google so they can provide suggestions. You can turn that off.

      In actual fact the Android browser has less of this than desktop Chrome does because it doesn't use phishing and malware protection feedback or integrate so tightly with Google services.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    6. Re:No Adblock :( by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Other than Larry Page constantly sending me emails consisting of a screen shot of whatever porn site I just browsed, and "LOL!" written below, no evidence whatsoever.

      And before you go "Well, that settles it!", Firefox is my primary porn browser.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    7. Re:No Adblock :( by Calos · · Score: 1

      Err... On the stock browser, I just hit the "Sign Out" button. According the google.com, I'm not signed in. Is there some reason to believe that secretly I'm still signed in? On the Chrome browser, I was never signed in to begin with.

      To the rest of it - you're digressing.

      --
      I vote based on politicians' actions, unless contrary to my preconceptions. Often wrong, never uncertain. #iamthe99%
    8. Re:No Adblock :( by markdavis · · Score: 1

      I have never seen any such button or setting anywhere in the browser or browser menus for any of my HTC devices, including now (I just looked). I also looked for such an option in the stock browser on the Xoom (ICS) and can't find anything like it there, either. Although that does have an "incognito" mode, and that mode's description says nothing about being signed out of Google's account.

      As for Chrome running on an Android device, I think it would be surprising if it didn't automatically pick up the current identity automatically and behind the scenes.

    9. Re:No Adblock :( by Calos · · Score: 1

      I have never seen any such button or setting anywhere in the browser or browser menus for any of my HTC devices, including now (I just looked). I also looked for such an option in the stock browser on the Xoom (ICS) and can't find anything like it there, either. Although that does have an "incognito" mode, and that mode's description says nothing about being signed out of Google's account.

      Because like any other browser on any other platform, being logged in is not a browser setting, but a webpage setting. I wouldn't look to sign out of my Amazon account in my Firefox preferences because I'm on my phone and not a desktop. Simply go to google.com, if it says you're signed in, then hit sign out.

      Incognito mode should also work, as it shouldn't start with any history or browser data at all.

      As for Chrome running on an Android device, I think it would be surprising if it didn't automatically pick up the current identity automatically and behind the scenes.

      It does requests Accounts permissions, but this is unsurprising - Chrome has sync and Chrome to Mobile built in, and to use them, it needs to access your account. But this is an option in the settings, and in Chrome, automatically signing in to Google services is also an option.

      --
      I vote based on politicians' actions, unless contrary to my preconceptions. Often wrong, never uncertain. #iamthe99%
    10. Re:No Adblock :( by markdavis · · Score: 1

      Good info. Looks like I wasn't "signed in" either. But I still suspect my account is linked back to them for tracking, regardless. It is all a bit scary at times.

  7. A new FF story every day by Hentes · · Score: 2

    With the rapid release schedule a story for every FF release would already be more than enough, but now we are getting a new story for a BETA for every platform?

    1. Re:A new FF story every day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is essentially a large-rewrite of the android firefox completely.

    2. Re:A new FF story every day by cpu6502 · · Score: 2

      You read my mind. Firefox coverage here is ridiculous and overdone. Meanwhile other browsers like Opera and seaMonkey are basically ignored when they have new releases.

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    3. Re:A new FF story every day by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

      Seamonkey is just what you get when a firefox and a thunderbird get freaky on a friday night...

      Big deal about FF for me is that working in education, most learning management systems have historically supported IE and FF ... just recently Angel started supporting Chrome and Safari (but only on desktops) ... so FF availability for non-Windows platforms is pretty big in my book...

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    4. Re:A new FF story every day by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

      >>>Seamonkey is just what you get when a firefox and a thunderbird get freaky on a friday night...

      You have it backwards.
      Seamonkey existed first (originally called Mozilla/Netscape Communicator).
      Firefox, Thunderbird were split off from it.

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
  8. alas by wbr1 · · Score: 1

    My little cheapo LG LS670(posting from it now) won't run it or chrome. But.. I can surf, mail, youtube, IM, track my runs, track hours, run squareup, bank, and more. WTF do I need FF for?

    --
    Silence is a state of mime.
    1. Re:alas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good question. I installed FF for Android awhile back on my phone... to be honest, it offered nothing more than the default browser did. As a matter of fact, it seemed to run slower (but that might just be me). So I got rid of it and went back to the stock browser.

  9. FINALLY, Flash support. by scottbomb · · Score: 1

    Testing now. If it syncs with my computers, I may be switching from Dolphin.

    1. Re:FINALLY, Flash support. by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      How much Flash do you use on your phone? To me, not being forced to download Flash ads is a blessing. Also, last time I tried the Flash Plugin, games and other, more sophisticated Flash UIs were quirky or broken. That might be the app designers' fault -- they weren't thinking of mobile phone touchscreens when they built them. But the point is, I found in-browser Flash to be pretty much useless on Android.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    2. Re:FINALLY, Flash support. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sssshh, don't let them find out. Next you know they'll be pushing HTML5+canvas+video+audio+JS ads you won't be able to block effectively on most mobile browsers due to lack of full fledged NoScript. By that time you'll be remembering good old Flash ads days with kindness, like those GIFs after the advent of shitty Flash banners.

    3. Re:FINALLY, Flash support. by Calos · · Score: 1

      Some websites almost require flash support. Big, popular sites? No, but ones I may be interested in nonetheless. Actually, some small businesses that outsourced their website design may be the worst offenders, but I'm still interested in the business. It's also useful for some things like college hockey scores - I like college hockey, and until recently, many live stats pages did not have a non-flash counterpart.

      In essence: the need for flash is diminishing but not yet gone. I'm happy to be able to use it in this period of transition.

      --
      I vote based on politicians' actions, unless contrary to my preconceptions. Often wrong, never uncertain. #iamthe99%
  10. Let me know when Android devices equal the N900. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    I've bought mine twice over since there isn't a good enough replacement (the N950 came close aside from not being retail available).

    Let me know when an Android-based phone has:

    * Root-out of the box
    * Hardware QWERTY
    * Removable SD storage
    * Large internal storage
    * Works with T-Mobile 3G/4G bands (if not just the latter)
    * FM+RDS Transmitter
    * USB Host
    * Onboard Wifi that can be repurposed for carrier-hostile tether
    * Debian-based userland
    * Relatively curve-free body (unlike most everything HTC).

    In short, a phone platform that's a multitool in its own right and isnt beholden to a carrier.

    I'm not sure about all those forks you're talking about, but there aren't more than three major ones. That should be easy enough to not have Firefox be de-supported.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  11. Re:Let me know when Android devices equal the N900 by Elrond,+Duke+of+URL · · Score: 1

    I'm typing this on a Droid 3 and it meets many of those requirements. It is most notably lacking out-of-the-box root, but I fixed that soon after getting the phone. I am still rather pissed that the bootloader is locked, so even when I change the ROM I can't change the kernel. And, with it rooted, wifi tethering is open to me if I wish. The body is also fairly rectangular. Except for the rounded corners, it's quite straight.

    It would be nice to have Debian beneath Android, though.

    --
    Elrond, Duke of URL
    "This is the most fun I've had without being drenched in the blood of my enemies!"-Sam&Max
  12. Am I the only one? by yosifkit · · Score: 1

    I cannot be the only one who read the title as "New Firefox" for "Android Beta." Language can be so ambiguous at times.

  13. Re:Let me know when Android devices equal the N900 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except for the rounded corners, it's quite straight.

    It'll be perfect 45.00000 degree angles all around once Apple gets wind of this!

  14. Re:Let me know when Android devices equal the N900 by evilviper · · Score: 3, Informative

    * Root-out of the box
    * Hardware QWERTY
    * Removable SD storage
    * Large internal storage
    * Works with T-Mobile 3G/4G bands (if not just the latter)
    * FM+RDS Transmitter
    * USB Host
    * Onboard Wifi that can be repurposed for carrier-hostile tether
    * Debian-based userland
    * Relatively curve-free body (unlike most everything HTC).

    Devices aren't rooted out-of-the-box, but it's trivial to root any Android device. USB cable to the PC (Linux/Windows/Mac) and run a shell script to invoke ADB and transfer the SU APK. Really, really simple.

    Hardware QWERTY is very easy to come by with Android.

    Just about all new Android phones have removable microSD.

    Size of internal storage varies from phone to phone. If you're willing to spend good money, you can get at least 64GB. Personally, I'm perfectly happy with very limited internal storage, and relying on said swappable microSD cards.

    I'm sure you can find plenty that'll work on T-Mobile's network. Personally I'd strongly recomend looking at Sprint first, though...

    FM Transmitter seems like a ridiculously silly requirement to me, (long-live bluetooth) but I imagine you can find an Android phone that has it.

    Any high-end Android phone will support acting as a USB Host... And if it doesn't, you just need to root it and install the appropriate app.

    Once you've rooted the phone, you can install a plethora of Wifi Tethering apps. There's at least one that claims to work without root, but I can't vouch for it... YMMV.

    Lots of people install a Debian userland on their Androids... It only gets ugly if you want to run X11 apps (NX Client, for me), and I'm hopeful that the new X server will get up to snuff soon.
     

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  15. Too slow by Turmoyl · · Score: 2

    Just like its predecessor, this beta loads content too slowly to be usable as a daily driver. In high contrast there's the Opera mobile browser, which is the fastest page renderer I've found on Android yet. I'll also take Opera's "speed dial" feature over Firefox's "loathsome bar" on any given day.

  16. New permissions, no explanation for why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sadly this new updates requires two additional rather intrusive permissions with no explanation as to why they are needed. As someone who carefully watches which permissions an app requests, this was very disappointing and until they justify these additional permissions, I won't be updating. It's concerning that there is such a large number of people out there who install Android apps without at least glancing at the permissions they request.

    1. Re:New permissions, no explanation for why by kbrosnan · · Score: 2

      https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/how-firefox-android-use-permissions-it-requests not sure if the most recent changes made to it for the Beta are live.

      --
      These people look deep within my soul and assign me a number based upon the order I joined. -Homer Simpson
  17. STILL no text reflow on zoom? What the heck? by TheEyes · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Seriously, the stock browser has been able to reflow text on zoom practically forever; why doesn't Firefox Mobile?

    This is the killer feature for me; with my poor vision I always have to zoom in pretty far to see anything on those tiny screens, and being forced to pan left and right to see every line is a huge pain. I like FF for its bookmark/password sync functionality, but when it comes to actually reading anything it's almost easier to copy the bookmark out of Firefox into the stock browser and go from there.

    1. Re:STILL no text reflow on zoom? What the heck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try the Bigger Text add-on, when you double-tab to zoom it will resize the text for you so it is easier to read. There is also a "reformat text on zoom option" which I think I tried before the update and before installing Bigger Text, but I didn't notice it doing anything, but I don't have the option on now anyway.

    2. Re:STILL no text reflow on zoom? What the heck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try the Dolphin browser. It has many of the features of Firefox, and it reflows text on zoom well.

    3. Re:STILL no text reflow on zoom? What the heck? by caspy7 · · Score: 1

      There is an addon for this.
      They are also working to add this.

    4. Re:STILL no text reflow on zoom? What the heck? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      I see that option in the preferences.

      That said, this beta is super slow, actually getting a click on a link to register takes 10 tires, and sync setup fails.

      So, back to the release version for me.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  18. Worthy of note by dark_requiem · · Score: 2

    This story is worthy of note. As others have mentioned, this is the first beta release to use the Android native UI instead of xul. I can attest it is *dramatically* faster, night and day. The previous xul-based builds were largely unusable, taking 30 seconds just to start, even on my heavily oc'd phone. The new native UI builds run smoothly and fluidly. I've been using the native UI builds since they were first released as nightlies (currently on Firefox 15 nightly), and they're a big step forward.

    That being said, these do have some big downsides. The native UI builds dropped support for things like text selection, copy/paste (can't copy what you can't select), and generally feel unpolished. Once all the features from the xul builds are available in the native ui builds, it'll be the best browser around, hands down. Until then, it's a nice tech demo from Mozilla.

  19. Re:Let me know when Android devices equal the N900 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A-freaking-men to this. I'll add:
    * IM & SMS integrated the same coherent messaging framework (so the same interface controls all messaging, regardless of protocol, though you do pick which protocol)
    * Skype, Google Video and other video chat integrating to the dialer and contacts list (so one interface for all).
    * Extensible media framework [gstreamer & tracker] (the default framework can be easily extended to support new filetypes)

    I'm shocked and appalled that Android (apparently even in ICS) is missing the above features, I simply assumed that they would have this. Anyone know if this is because there's no framework included, or if apps just don't take advantage of it?

    I think the n900's hardware sucked big-time (Maemo was sluggish on my n900 from day 1 with a factory load and I was constantly out of memory after running a single browser, though that might just be a problem with my phone or some background / desktop apps I installed). But Maemo itself is vastly superior to Android. If only there was a way to run Maemo on my Galaxy S2... I'd take advantage in a heartbeat...

  20. no thanks by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't ever remove the default browser because I'd be afraid of breaking a critical function, and I see no value in having to choose between two browsers when I want to browse on my phone.

    1. Re:no thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hhahahaaaaa.. Nice.
      Why are you even using Android then?

      The walled garden is over there in Apple's corner.

    2. Re:no thanks by BradleyUffner · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't ever remove the default browser because I'd be afraid of breaking a critical function, and I see no value in having to choose between two browsers when I want to browse on my phone.

      You can't remove the default browser (not without root hackery any way). This just gets installed along side it.

    3. Re:no thanks by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 0

      Thus my other point. If I'm going to have to have two browsers on my phone, it's not worth the bother.

  21. Re:Let me know when Android devices equal the N900 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    I've bought mine twice over since there isn't a good enough replacement (the N950 came close aside from not being retail available).

    Let me know when an Android-based phone has:

    * Root-out of the box
    pick most newer Android phones
    * Hardware QWERTY
    You're doing it wrong seriously soft keboard with predictive type or keyboards like swype destroy a physical keyboard
    * Removable SD storage
    completely unnecessary, but available on many Androids
    * Large internal storage
    pick any new phone
    * Works with T-Mobile 3G/4G bands (if not just the latter)
    pick any newer phone
    * FM+RDS Transmitter
    You're doing it wrong seriously- 1980's want their tech back.
    * USB Host
    pick most newer Android phones
    * Onboard Wifi that can be repurposed for carrier-hostile tether
    pick any newer Android phone
    * Debian-based userland
    LOL seriously? your just making shit up now
    * Relatively curve-free body (unlike most everything HTC).

    In short, a phone platform that's a multitool in its own right and isnt beholden to a carrier.

    I'm not sure about all those forks you're talking about, but there aren't more than three major ones. That should be easy enough to not have Firefox be de-supported.

    People can come up with weird excuses to believe "dumb" phones are still the "best" option also but that doesn't make it true. I know change is tough, but the other side really is much better...

  22. It's hopefully an improvement by bobjr94 · · Score: 1

    I really tried to use the FF on my phone, messed with setting, got ad-ons, but it just was bad. Pages would never display the right, things wouldnt work, it was slow, took alot of memory...I switched to dolphin hd a few months ago, everything works, no crashes, very fast to open and load pages and a few more things.

    1. Re:It's hopefully an improvement by SurfsUp · · Score: 1

      It's really impressively fast, but it's missing essential functionality. No pinch zoom? Makes maps.google.com a pain. No keyboard shortcuts? Huh?

      Impressive work, but not yet usable.

      --
      Life's a bitch but somebody's gotta do it.
    2. Re:It's hopefully an improvement by SurfsUp · · Score: 1

      Oh, not to be so negative, I really like the way it tells me "maps.google.com wants your location (ok/not ok?)"

      --
      Life's a bitch but somebody's gotta do it.
    3. Re:It's hopefully an improvement by Calos · · Score: 1

      Same with other browsers, e.g. Chrome. Not sure about the stock browser.

      --
      I vote based on politicians' actions, unless contrary to my preconceptions. Often wrong, never uncertain. #iamthe99%
  23. Re:Let me know when Android devices equal the N900 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hardware qwerty is a flaw now a days.

  24. Re:Let me know when Android devices equal the N900 by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

    I actually thought tethering was built in on all Android phones. I have an LG Optimus G2x that I upgraded to the TMobile firmware, because they never released a 2.3 upgrade for my carrier (Wind Mobile), and both the original firmware and the T-Mobile gingerbread firmware supported tethering without any fuss.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  25. Re:Let me know when Android devices equal the N900 by Calos · · Score: 1

    Up to the carrier. Some disable or hide the feature.

    --
    I vote based on politicians' actions, unless contrary to my preconceptions. Often wrong, never uncertain. #iamthe99%
  26. Re:Let me know when Android devices equal the N900 by Calos · · Score: 1

    It's only trivial to root if the manufacturer makes it easy to unlock or an exploit is found.

    Fortunately, the winds are swaying towards manufacturer support. HTC makes it easy now. I think most Samsung devices are fairly straightforward. Last I saw, Motorola made it a PITA (should change once Google takes over). Even still, it takes more work for these devices. HTC for example, you need to make an account on their developer page, get some info off of your device and submit it, get a key from them, take the appropriate steps to unlock, then start rooting.

    The Nexus devices it is as easy as you say, however.

    --
    I vote based on politicians' actions, unless contrary to my preconceptions. Often wrong, never uncertain. #iamthe99%
  27. Re:Let me know when Android devices equal the N900 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This, plus "USB Host" is NOT a software fix. Either the chipset can handle it or it can't. I do believe though, that Ice Cream Sandwich lists USB Host as a minimum requirement, and USB Host support is not uncommon. I'd venture to say that any phone you bought that meets your other requirements (sans factory root) will have USB Host.

  28. Re:Let me know when Android devices equal the N900 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IM/SMS integration and VOIP/Non-VOIP Phone integration as a stock feature is not going to happen. No vendor is going to obfuscate whether or not you are consuming a free or paid service, nor will the shift to all "free" (i.e. no marginal cost) services.

  29. Standard keyboard shortcuts still don't work by SurfsUp · · Score: 1

    Come on guys, some of us have keyboards. How hard can it be to implement Ctrl-t?

    --
    Life's a bitch but somebody's gotta do it.
  30. stupid slashcode... by advocate_one · · Score: 2

    slashdot really NEEDS to fix the experience for mobile browsers... I've just tried the new beta on this site and it's a fscked up experience... just logging in is a real pain as the fancy login window doesn't work well with the onscreen keyboard... and the tabs and links on the pages do not work very well either... touch one and 9 times out of ten, nothing happens... even when zoomed right in on it... the tabs at the bottom of the page don't work either so you're stuck with whatever stories are shown on the front page...

    --
    Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    1. Re:stupid slashcode... by speedingant · · Score: 1

      Agreed, it's a POS browser on a tablet. It looks tacky, doesn't work well at all. Why change to tabs on the side, but cannot slide to remove and half the time you close the tab window it removes a tab. FFF-FF-UUUU!!!

    2. Re:stupid slashcode... by B2382F29 · · Score: 1

      If you have your own webserver, try this: http://www.fourteenminutes.com/code/avantslash/

      --
      Move Sig. For great justice.
  31. They removed the best feature by B2382F29 · · Score: 1

    Really, it seems they removed the only killer feature that Firefox had before, the way you could switch tabs.

    Before, it was move to the right then select one of the big tabs on the left. Now I have to tap into some small corner to show the tabs? Really? I think I just stay with the built in (ICS/CM9) browser which basically works exactly like that and also hides the navigation bar once the page is loaded

    --
    Move Sig. For great justice.
  32. Re:Let me know when Android devices equal the N900 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a Samsung SGSII, coming straight from Nokia N900 and N950 (yes, one of those _great_ developer devices which i love, but it's dead on arrival):

    * Root out of the box: almost,it's a matter of less than ten minutes, including download. Samsung does not lock its devices, so no risks no strange procedures. Just fire up the tool, download the rooted kernel, upload, reboot. CHECK

    * HArdware QWERTY: not the SGSII, but my bluetooth keyboard works out of the box (derived from a PS2 kb, it's small and handy). NOT check

    * SD: yes! My 32GB uSD works like a charm CHECK

    * Yes! 16 internal GB + 4GB (system partition) . CHECK

    * WiFi thethering works out-of-the-box with all Android versions, it's reliable, supports WPA2 and all the whistles. CHECK

    * FM-RDS: Yes, CHECK

    * USB host: Yes CHECK

    * T-Mobile 3g/4g. Don't know about 4g (no 4g in Italy...) but 3G works like a charm. CHECK

    * Debian based: No, but you can always install debian if you like... CHECK

    * Curve free body: CHECK

    So what? Yes, i moved from N900 to Android i found out why NOKIA lost and it's going to die.

    Sorry.

    (in my apps i still support N900 tough)

  33. Tablet support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They point out that many Android phones are supported, and that a beta version for tablets will be coming soon.

    Screw the wiki, there's tablet support on the actual release page... https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/mobile/14.0beta/system-requirements/

    And as far as Native UI is concerned... must have been said by someone who never opened the Preferences... about a third of my screen is wasted in a useless whitespace border, and yuck, it looks nothing like the Android UI!

  34. Re:Let me know when Android devices equal the N900 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Android-based
    > * Debian-based userland

    So you don't want an Android based device.

  35. Re:Let me know when Android devices equal the N900 by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

    I actually thought tethering was built in on all Android phones.

    I don't know how this works for USians, but if you're a Telstra customer, your telco specifically states in their TOS that they have no problem with tethering.

    However, my last Android phone (Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 Mini Pro) was a POS with locked-down firmware that neither the manufacturer nor telco had any intention of upgrading, so I was stuck with no tethering for a while. But, my new Samsung Galaxy Nexus (Android version 4.x) has native tethering that works well, and (Yippee!!) Telstra hasn't felt the need to fill the machine up with crapware that I need to root the device to get rid of. Wonders never cease...

  36. Re:Let me know when Android devices equal the N900 by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

    Hardware qwerty is a flaw now a days.

    You may be right. Until quite recently, as I mentioned in an earlier post, I had a Sony/Ericsson Xperia X10 Mini Pro where I had anticipated that the hardware keyboard would be a plus, but I was pathetically grateful when the machine died and I was able to replace it with a (Samsung) device where I could actually see the keypad.

    Oh, and yes, I am nearly 50, so eyesight is an issue. But FWIW, the Galaxy Nexus is an awesome phone, and I'm really happy with it.

  37. Re:Let me know when Android devices equal the N900 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You drive a Chevy. I drive a Ford. You suck.

    Is that how it works?

  38. Not on iOS by strikeleader · · Score: 0

    Too bad Apple is allowed to block another browser from being installed. Seeing as everyone is going after Microsoft for not allowing Firefox on 8RT why not do the same for Apple?

  39. Re:Let me know when Android devices equal the N900 by pnutjam · · Score: 1

    The droid bionic also fits the majority of your requested features. Lapdock seems pretty awesome too.

  40. Re:Let me know when Android devices equal the N900 by pnutjam · · Score: 1

    rooted my bionic with a simple script, works great.