Slashdot Mirror


Iran Threatens Legal Action Against Google For Not Labeling Gulf 'Persian'

New submitter PantherSE writes with an article at CNN about the geopolitical importance of labeling, excerpting thus: "Iran has threatened legal action against Google for not labeling the Persian Gulf on its maps. 'Toying with modern technologies in political issues is among the new measures by the enemies against Iran, (and) in this regard, Google has been treated as a plaything,' Foreign Ministry spokesman Ramin Mehmanparast said Thursday, according to state-run Press TV. He added that 'omitting the name Persian Gulf is (like) playing with the feelings and realities of the Iranian nation.'"

246 comments

  1. What's missing? by ericloewe · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Is the Persian Gulf unlabeled? Is it labeled "Gulf" (sounds stupid, but no reason for a lawsuit)? Is it labeled something else?

    1. Re:What's missing? by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 5, Funny

      Is the Persian Gulf unlabeled? Is it labeled "Gulf" (sounds stupid, but no reason for a lawsuit)? Is it labeled something else?

      It's labeled Israeli Freedom Pond.

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    2. Re:What's missing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's apparently completely unlabeled, which is odd.

    3. Re:What's missing? by JabberWokky · · Score: 1

      It is unlabeled. Several of the bodies of water, including the smaller and neighboring Gulf of Oman, and around the Arabian peninsula, the Gulf of Aden and the Red Sea are all labelled.

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    4. Re:What's missing? by No,+I+am+Spratacus! · · Score: 1

      It's not labeled at all, as you can see for yourself:
      http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&ll=26.784847,51.943359&spn=13.256149,23.269043&t=m&z=6

      The smaller adjacent Gulf of Oman, however, is labeled.

    5. Re:What's missing? by chill · · Score: 4, Funny

      No. Google is moving to a sponsorship system. It is now "The Persian Gulf, brought to you by Budweiser".

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    6. Re:What's missing? by fgb · · Score: 2

      It should be labelled the Exxon Gulf.

    7. Re:What's missing? by courteaudotbiz · · Score: 1

      It is unlabeled, but if you search Google Maps for "Persian Gulf", you get a pin right in the target. Strange though that it is not labeled at all.

    8. Re:What's missing? by crazyjj · · Score: 2

      It's unlabelled. Looks like Google is trying to avoid a controversy I didn't even know existed. Apparently some Arabs want it renamed the "Arabian Gulf."

      --
      What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    9. Re:What's missing? by cupantae · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's got a big banner that says, "Getting first post is more important than adding to the discussion".

      But I'm sure you knew that already.

      --
      --
    10. Re:What's missing? by Eevee · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yet, a Google Maps search for the Persian Gulf takes you right to the unlabeled gulf, while searching for Arabian Gulf doesn't.

    11. Re:What's missing? by __aasehi2499 · · Score: 2

      Bin Maps correctly labels it.

    12. Re:What's missing? by __aasehi2499 · · Score: 1

      *Bing

    13. Re:What's missing? by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      I thought the Iranians were complaining about Google not naming it the Arabian Gulf. Looks like I had it backwards.

    14. Re:What's missing? by jd2112 · · Score: 1

      "BP Gulf of Mexico" anyone?

      --
      Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
    15. Re:What's missing? by jd2112 · · Score: 2

      Aren't they blocking Google anyway?

      --
      Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
    16. Re:What's missing? by SpzToid · · Score: 1

      You make a good point. I searched for "BP Gulf" and that region is clearly well defined already.

      --
      You can't be ahead of the curve, if you're stuck in a loop.
    17. Re:What's missing? by drobety · · Score: 1

      Interesting. I checked a few days ago, and the label was "Arabian Sea". Gone now.

    18. Re:What's missing? by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      Pretty much the same contents, only saltier.

    19. Re:What's missing? by drobety · · Score: 1

      Never mind, I am a confused old man I suppose.

    20. Re:What's missing? by idontgno · · Score: 2

      Sea water is less watery and tastier, even with bilge flushings of millions of dwts of crude old carriers.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    21. Re:What's missing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, and along with the extra salt, you get alcohol too!

    22. Re:What's missing? by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      That's what I thought but apparently some stuff will always get through.

    23. Re:What's missing? by tibman · · Score: 2

      Who defined correct?

      --
      http://soylentnews.org/~tibman
    24. Re:What's missing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bin died some wile back... shot in the face...

      He's at the bottom of some sea you see...

    25. Re:What's missing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I was Google I would label it exactly that in response to Iran's demands, as a big "Fuck You!" to them.

    26. Re:What's missing? by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      Is the Persian Gulf unlabeled?

      Yes, although if you search for "Persian Gulf", it takes you right there to where the label would be, exactly as when you search for the (labelled) "Gulf of California".

    27. Re:What's missing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm... I wonder if my google/open street map account would get banned if I tried labeling it as such.

    28. Re:What's missing? by peppepz · · Score: 2

      Among the others, the CIA ( https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/ir.html ), the UN, the International Hydrographic Organization, and Google ( http://maps.google.com/?q=persian+gulf ). And a lot of other people.

    29. Re:What's missing? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      The CIA is not an authority on the correct naming of anything outside of US borders, and especially not on the other side of the planet. The UN really isn't either; why should countries far removed from your own get to name bodies of water that border your country? I don't see how the IHO has any authority either. And private companies certainly aren't authorities on geopolitical matters either.

      The only people who have a real right to name things are people in the area that geographical feature is. Here, that means the Iranians and all their neighbors. Since they can't agree on a name, let them use their preferred name amongst themselves.

      The easy answer for Google seems to be to use both names, and use geolocation to pick the one preferred in a particular country. If someone with an Iranian IP is accessing Google Maps, it should show "Persian Gulf" (but in Farsi); if someone from Saudi Arabia is looking at the map, it should read "Arabian Gulf" (in Arabic). For other countries like the USA, it should show whatever the commonly-used name in that country is, much like US viewers of a map of Europe see "Germany" rather than the locally-preferred "Deutschland".

    30. Re:What's missing? by registrations_suck · · Score: 0

      It would be funny if they labeled Iran as: Iran (sucks!)

    31. Re:What's missing? by LocalH · · Score: 1

      With the people amongst whom this would cause a controversy, there is no way to avoid one. It's the same basic reason why you can't click on a map in Windows to set your time zone (well, one reason of many). If they call it "Persian Gulf", they piss off the Arabs. If they call it "Arabian Gulf", they piss off Iranians. If they use their last option and call it nothing, they still piss off the Iranians (as we see here) and they also probably piss off the Arabs as well.

      --
      FC Closer
    32. Re:What's missing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good question. I have an idea. Let's let the "Persians" pay for their own mapping system, publish it, and let me decide which one I like best?
      Chinese had walls. Hadrian had walls. Hell, even Berliners had walls.
      Life was simpler then.

    33. Re:What's missing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ....they still piss off the Iranians (as we see here) and they also probably piss off the Arabs as well.

      How do you piss off an Arab / Iranian?

      By EXISTING, you infidel fucker.

    34. Re:What's missing? by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

      I thought the Iranians were complaining about Google not naming it the Arabian Gulf. Looks like I had it backwards.

      Most Iranians are ethnically "Persian" and speak Farsi . They aren't Arabs. While most Iraqis are Arab, which is one reason they hate each other, and have for thousands of years.

    35. Re:What's missing? by JWSmythe · · Score: 2

      Did you check out the change log? Trademark issues, spam, blah, blah.

      If it wasn't locked, I'd change it to "Not Iran". :)


      Added on May 10, 2012 5:33pm by Andrew
      Undone 1 edits
      Approved
      Comment on May 10, 2012 5:34pm by Andrew
      Reason for editing : Other
      Deleting an existing feature is not the best way to cope with spam
      Approved on May 10, 2012 5:45pm by Angela
      Deleted on May 5, 2012 1:49pm by Fahd Bahrain
      Undone on May 10, 2012 5:33pm by AndrewDeleted
      Place marked as closed
      Comment on May 5, 2012 1:51pm by Fahd Bahrain
      Reason for editing : This place is closed
      To many spam in this body of water, the best thing is to delete it in order to stop the spam. thanks
      Negative note on May 5, 2012 4:47pm by Amir2085
      Reason: Good information changed for the worse
      thank you spamer!
      Marked as Bad data on May 5, 2012 6:39am
      Reason: Has wrong information
      Has wrong information
      Persian Gulf:
      Changed on May 5, 2012 3:20am by Ibn Majed
      Approved
      Name
      Deleted: Persian Gulf (English, type: Primary)
      Comment on May 5, 2012 3:20am by Ibn Majed
      Reason for editing : Fixing spam data
      should stay as unnamed body of water. To many spam in this area, I am tired of fixing all the spam. Thank you
      Marked as abuse on May 4, 2012 5:55pm
      Reason: Potential trademark violations
      This is persian gulf
      Marked as abuse on May 3, 2012 5:46pm
      Reason: Other
      Dear Google,

      The whole gulf has been called "Persian Gulf" for hundred years, you do not have the right to remove it from the map.
      Persian Gulf:
      Changed on Dec 22, 2011 7:08am by Anonymous
      Approved
      Persian Gulf:
      Changed on May 15, 2009 8:35am by Anonymous
      Approved
      Name
      Added: Persian Gulf (English, type: Primary)
      Geometry
      Changed: Boundary modified
      Added on Mar 31, 2009 7:24am by Anonymous
      Approved
      Type of Feature
      Added: Water
      Geometry
      Added: Polygon added
      This feature has undergone total 7 changes

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    36. Re:What's missing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shouldn't everyone first insist that Iran change it's name back to Persia?

    37. Re:What's missing? by peppepz · · Score: 1
      Like it or not, the CIA's factbook represents a view of what the american government sees outside its nation's borders [their "communist count" for each country, besides the "area" and "population" values, was memorable]. The IHO "enjoys observer status at the UN and is the recognised competent authority on hydrographic surveying and nautical charting; when referring to hydrography and nautical charting in Conventions and similar Instruments, it is the IHO standards and specifications that are normally used." (Wikipedia)

      But in practice, mine were only examples of the fact that just about everyone and his dog calls that place "persian gulf", which is the thing that matters, and they have been doing so for milleniums, and therefore Google should label it as such when the map is viewed in English, in most european languages, and in Farsi.

      The only people who have a real right to name things are people in the area that geographical feature is.

      I don't think there is "a right" to give names to places... there's just a name that, for historic / cultural / whatever reasons becomes the most commonly used one by a certain population, and that's what should appear in the maps intended for them. That's why your maps show "Germany" and not "Bundesrepublik Deutschland". And in this we agree.

      Besides, how do you exactly define "people in the area"? There are lots of places where either the majority or a minority of the people living in an area call the place with a different name than the official government ruling over it. If Google began choosing between either name they would open a can of worms (think about Palestine / Israel).

      That said, in case there's need to state it, I don't think that Google is making political statements by removing disputed place names, instead I think that it's just a technical issue, and I especially think that the idea of suing a company because you don't like its maps is beyond ridiculous - much more so if the supposed suer is a government known to kill his own people.

    38. Re:What's missing? by slashmydots · · Score: 1

      Is the Persian Gulf unlabeled? Is it labeled "Gulf" (sounds stupid, but no reason for a lawsuit)? Is it labeled something else?

      It's labeled Israeli Freedom Pond.

      That's only because I don't work for Google. If I did, it'd be labeled "Fuck you" before this story even broke. Possibly "Fuck you, Iran" to avoid confusion though for people who didn't catch the news story.
      Oh and a "software glitch" would tell everyone in Iran looking up driving directions to drive off a cliff. It would literally state "take a right, and go drive off a cliff" lol.

    39. Re:What's missing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only 50% of Iranians are Farsi. The rest are Kurds, Azeris, Baluchis and Arabs - the Arabs being their people in the south west, and being no different from the Iraqi Shia of Basra, Najaf, Karbala...

    40. Re:What's missing? by oobayly · · Score: 1

      Where did you find that? I tried Google Map Maker (which I didn't even know existed) to no avail.

    41. Re:What's missing? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Easiest problem in the world to solve that. In Arabic language name it the Arabian Gulf, in Farsi name in the Persian Gulf, in English sell the name to the highest bidder.

      It is pretty much normal practice for many countries, places, regions, geographical features to a different names in different languages.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    42. Re:What's missing? by JWSmythe · · Score: 4, Interesting

      hehe. Someone labeled it again. :) Well, I'll explain how to do it without the marker. It'll still work this way.

      Go to http://maps.google.com/

      Search "Persian Gulf"

      In the middle of the gulf, right click, and select "Directions To Here"

      You'll now have a green marker in the middle of the water. Click on it. It'll say something like


      Address:
      27.362011, 50.886841
      Save to map more

      Click on "More" and then click "Edit History"

      Someone made the gulf a polygon back in 2009. You'll see it in the history. :) You can do this almost anywhere in the gulf, I'd think. I just aimed for the middle.

      The Arabian Gulf also has a marker, but it's just off of Kuwait. It's been there since 2009, and there is some discussion on the fact it should be the entire gulf, not just a coastal area.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    43. Re:What's missing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Arabian Sea is the body of water south of Pakistan, and north of the Indian Ocean, and covers the area between India, Arabian peninsula and Somalia. The waterway between Oman and Iran, though not technically a gulf, is called the Gulf of Oman. The water separator between Oman/UAE and Iran is called the Straight of Hormuz, and before that, the entire body of water between Kuwait and the Strait of Hormuz is normally called the Persian Gulf.

      Why don't the Arabs just call the Red Sea the Arabian Gulf? It is a gulf, even though the gulfs of Suez and Aqaba merge into it. And in this case, all countries on either side are Arab countries - Saudi Arabia and Yemen on the East, and Egypt and Sudan on the West. Even Eritrea, being a Muslim country, is not likely to mind. And it also has Jeddah, Mecca and Medina - the home of Islam, so that should make them even happier. Would any country mind if people stopped calling the Red Sea the Red Sea?

    44. Re:What's missing? by petman · · Score: 1

      Bing has Maps? Wow, I never knew that.

    45. Re:What's missing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be funny if they labeled Iran as: Iran (sucks!)

      No, that would just be childish.
      If they relabelled it as "Israeli Firing Range #3", however...

    46. Re:What's missing? by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      Both statements are correct but thanks for the clarification.

    47. Re:What's missing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like how you just made several people go look at the map for you instead of simply looking yourself. Are you my boss by any chance?

    48. Re:What's missing? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      much like US viewers of a map of Europe see "Germany" rather than the locally-preferred "Deutschland".

      I never could understand why we say "Germany" and the Germans say "Deutschland". Or why Burma is now Myanmar, or Siam now Thailand, or Persia now Iran? Does anybody have an answer to that?

    49. Re:What's missing? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      It's not just us; there's other instances people having different names for countries than that countries' inhabitants. The French, for instance, call Germany "Allemagne". The Germans, in turn, call France "Frankreich" (although obviously that's pretty close to the original), and the French call it "Francais" IIRC, so for most places it seems the names are more of a variation of the locals' name for the place, rather than something completely different like Germany/Deutschland/Allemagne. Germans, for instance, call the USA "Die Vereinigten Staaten", which translated to English, of course means "the united states", though they usually just say "USA" (pronounced "ooh ess ahh"), at least that's what I was taught in German class around 1990 so that may have changed by now.

      I think Burma was renamed to Myanmar by the military junta that took over there not that long ago. I believe the other two are similar examples: the ruling powers in those countries changed their own names. That's an entirely separate issue from country A calling country B "C".

    50. Re:What's missing? by mysidia · · Score: 1

      It does make sense... sort of... the name "Persian Gulf" is the internationally recognized name. "Arabian Gulf" is a local preference that does not have much acceptance.

    51. Re:What's missing? by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Apparently some Arabs want it renamed the "Arabian Gulf."

      Who cares... I want the Gulf of Mexico to be renamed to The Gulf of Texas. Some Arabs wanting something named does not make it authoritative.

      The International Hydrographic Organization calls it Persian gulf. Persian gulf is the authoritative name.

      And the name doesn't change just because a few folks are dismayed by it.

  2. Plaything? by BadPirate · · Score: 2

    Oh it's on ____.

    --
    - Holy crap, I've got MOD points! Who thought that was a good idea.
  3. Seems so 1995... by adjuster · · Score: 5, Informative

    Back in Windows 95 you could click on your country on the world map to set the time zone. A border dispute caused complaints to Microsoft and they removed the feature (http://blogs.msdn.com/b/oldnewthing/archive/2003/08/22/54679.aspx). This reminds me of that, only sillier.

    --
    The Attitude Adjuster, I hate me, you can too.
    1. Re:Seems so 1995... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Informative

      I had to check and sure enough the Persian Gulf isn't labeled. So I did the obvious thing and scrolled over to China and saw that Taiwan was labeled Taiwan.

      As far as geopolitics go, I think keeping China happy by not provoking them on the Taiwan issue is far more important than ticking off Iran by not labeling the Persian Gulf.

      I couldn't even fathom why this was an issue, but google brought up this link about a naming dispute which Iran apparently takes quite seriously. So, if the goal was to piss off and humiliate Iran, wouldn't Google have labeled it the Arabian Gulf?

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    2. Re:Seems so 1995... by chrb · · Score: 4, Informative
      Indeed.

      Why isn't my time zone highlighted on the world map?

      In the original release of Windows 95, you could change your time zone by clicking on the map, and the time zone you selected would highlight. Similarly, you could change your Region Settings by clicking on the world map. This was one of those little touches that made Windows 95 that much more fun to use.

      But we had to remove those features within months of release, even though we based both of the maps on the borders officially recognized by the United Nations.

      In early 1995, a border war broke out between Peru and Ecuador and the Peruvian government complained to Microsoft that the border was incorrectly placed. Of course, if we complied and moved the border northward, we'd get an equally angry letter from the Ecuadorian government demanding that we move it back. So we removed the feature altogether.

      The time zone map met a similar fate. The Indian government threatened to ban all Microsoft software from the country because we assigned a disputed region to Pakistan in the time zone map. (Any map that depicts an unfavorable border must bear a government stamp warning the end-user that the borders are incorrect. You can't stamp software.) We had to make a special version of Windows 95 for them.

      Geopolitics is a very sensitive subject.

      Google gets entangled in Taiwan-China dispute

      Google Inc.'s popular online mapping service has become entangled in a long-running territorial dispute between China and Taiwan.

      Until recently, Google's maps described Taiwan as a "province of China." That sparked protests from Taiwan's government, which has considered its island an independent state since ending a civil war with China more than a half-century ago.

      Shortly after Taiwan's foreign ministry formally complained, the China reference abruptly disappeared from Google's Taiwan map last week. That change has provoked cries of dismay in China and talk of a possible boycott of Google's service in that country, according to Chinese media.

      If I recall correctly, Microsoft also faced the same issue after they suggested Taiwan was somehow an independent nation in locale settings, but they changed it after the Chinese government complained.

    3. Re:Seems so 1995... by BetaDays · · Score: 1

      I wonder what happened to that map. If only I had the mod points to give you for that.

      --
      Paul: Father... father, the sleeper has awakened! - Dune
    4. Re:Seems so 1995... by vistic · · Score: 2

      What does China (People's Republic of China) call the island of Taiwan if not Taiwan? Formosa?

      If they want to avoid pissing off China (PRC) they would avoid labeling Taiwan as the "Republic of China", which they have.

    5. Re:Seems so 1995... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      So I did the obvious thing and scrolled over to China and saw that Taiwan was labeled Taiwan.

      PRC does not have a problem with the term "Taiwan" as such, because it's just the name of the island. They only get a fit if you call it "Republic of China", or otherwise state or imply that it's a sovereign country.

      If you want another example where a name is omitted on Google Maps for what looks like political reasons, try Sea of Japan.

    6. Re:Seems so 1995... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      It's labeled as an independent country, which I assure you is the essence of the dispute.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    7. Re:Seems so 1995... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      or otherwise state or imply that it's a sovereign country.

      Which, as I should have clarified, is exactly what they've done. Taiwan is labeled as an independent country. Contrast with Puerto Rico or any of the islands that make up the Philippines to see the difference.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    8. Re:Seems so 1995... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      When I look at it in Google Maps, I actually see the localized Chinese label, so I don't know what it says. But it doesn't look like a country label - it's slightly bolded, and larger than other labels, but e.g. Hong Kong is labelled in exact same font size/weight. And labels for individual US states and Canadian provinces are even more prominent.

      The only reliable indicator of whether it's a country or not on Google Maps seems to be the way borders are drawn - borders between states are solid, while those between internal subdivisions are dashed. But, of course, Taiwan being an island, there's no border to draw.

    9. Re:Seems so 1995... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, this was actually a point of contention for a while. Once upon a time Google labeled Taiwan as a province of China, resulting in numerous protests from the Taiwanese government. At the time, Google was happy to side with a billion Chinese users over 20 million Taiwanese users. Then when Google decided to tell China to go fuck themselves, they relabled Taiwan as an independent country just to twist the knife a bit. As far as I know, the Chinese government is still threatening Google over this.

    10. Re:Seems so 1995... by snowgirl · · Score: 1

      Google generally takes to naming things the local term. But I knew about a naming clash for Macedonia. Apparently Google has labeled it first with its native name, then the Latin character equivalent while also including the United Nations-recognized "FYROM" (the former Yugoslavian Republic of Macedonia... yes, the "former" is capitalized correctly... it is also sorted as if it starts with a "t", because it does.)

      --
      WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
    11. Re:Seems so 1995... by Mt._Honkey · · Score: 1

      I recall the Republic of China participating in the Olympics under the name "Chinese Taipei" to appease the PRC

      --

      Don't Bogart the fish sticks
    12. Re:Seems so 1995... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      When I look at it in Google Maps, I actually see the localized Chinese label, so I don't know what it says. But it doesn't look like a country label - it's slightly bolded, and larger than other labels, but e.g. Hong Kong is labelled in exact same font size/weight.

      Then it's localized to also not be a country (or just more confusing with Chinese characters). On my Google Maps it's the exact same font as everything that is a country and nothing that isn't. It is very clear that it is treated as a country.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    13. Re:Seems so 1995... by wisty · · Score: 3, Informative

      No, it's a "region". All the countries are "regions", but not all "regions" are necessarily countries. It's a great weasel word for people who want to reach some sort of consensus (i.e. on "country codes") without being able to resolve 50 year old conflicts. Taiwan also has its own "country code" (.tw), because it is an independent country, dependent territory, or special area of geographical interest - and the beauty is you don't have to say which.

      Seriously, Microsoft has had employees detained in China because they didn't make this sort of thing clear enough.

    14. Re:Seems so 1995... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      One interesting thing I've noticed is that it seems to depend on whether I enable WebGL or not. When it's enabled, it seems that labels are drawn client-side, and then the label for Taiwan is just as big as for China. Without WebGL, the labels are part of the tile images, and there it's the same size as Hong Kong, and smaller than China.

      I wonder if it also depends on the language for the labels. For me, all labels show in the local language - i.e. in Chinese for China, in Japanese for Japan, in English for U.S. etc. I recall it used to be different, and I couldn't find any way to switch it to English only (for that matter, I couldn't even find "Settings" in Google Maps UI at all - WTF?).

    15. Re:Seems so 1995... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, now I understand, you made a baseless claim and are frantically struggling to support it with supposition, hence your increasingly frantic insistence that it is "labeled as a country". Instead, just admit you made a fool of yourself and act like a grown up.

    16. Re:Seems so 1995... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Um, you can look at Google Maps yourself and see that I'm telling the truth. Or you could try to justify your baseless claim by using poetic verbiage. Which would be more adult?

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    17. Re:Seems so 1995... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      No, it's a "region". All the countries are "regions", but not all "regions" are necessarily countries.

      Huh. So are there any "regions" which aren't "countries" according to people who don't have a vested political interest in them not being countries, or is this literally a "Let's make China happy" weasel?

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    18. Re:Seems so 1995... by MacGyver2210 · · Score: 1

      This is pretty confusing with Japanese prefecture boundaries/labels and 'ward' boundaries/labels as well.

      --
      If the only way you can accept an assertion is by faith, then you are conceding that it can't be taken on its own merits
    19. Re:Seems so 1995... by MacGyver2210 · · Score: 1

      On the drop-down menu in the upper-right of Google Maps, where you would pick Satellite/Maps/Photos/etc, one of the options I have is a checkbox labeled 'English' which determines if the labels show up in English or their local language.

      --
      If the only way you can accept an assertion is by faith, then you are conceding that it can't be taken on its own merits
    20. Re:Seems so 1995... by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      Alaska is a region and not a country. It's part of a larger country, the USA, but on Google Maps, it only says "Alaska" and draws the border separating it from Canada. The "Alaska" font is smaller than the "Canada" font however.

      Svalbard is also a region (and island chain), and not a country. It's owned by Norway, but Google Maps only shows "Svalbard". And the font is just as big as those used for other European countries.

      The ownership of both these regions is not in dispute (except maybe by Sarah Palin's husband), but Google doesn't bother to state under each one "territory of [country]".

    21. Re:Seems so 1995... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      No, it's not. Take a look at Svalbard.

    22. Re:Seems so 1995... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      The "Alaska" font is smaller than the "Canada" font however.

      Yes it's the same font as used for every other state or province (or territory ala Puerto Rico). It is not an example of what the GP was talking about.

      Svalbard is also a region

      This is much more interesting. Svarlbard is part of the Kingdom of Norway. This made me wonder about Ireland, part of the UK, but also given the same font. China's provinces -- including the island of Hainan -- don't use that font, only Taiwan.

      But still, it seems the separation isn't clear-cut and you can't infer Google's opinion nationhood in some edge-cases which I'm sure they consider a feature.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    23. Re:Seems so 1995... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      You need to back to grade school. Ireland is NOT part of the UK. Northern Ireland is part of the UK however, but I just looked at Google Maps and I don't see any label for it at all.

      Also interestingly, I don't see any labels for Scotland or Wales or England, even though those are separate countries too (but they're all part of the United Kingdom, which is labeled, and which is also a country, which of course is rather confusing, but that's the UK for you). But the Isle of Man, which is also part of the UK but not a full-fledged country the way Scotland, Northern Ireland, England and Wales are, has its own label.

    24. Re:Seems so 1995... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Why, it didn't help the first time. :)

      So yeah, UK weirdness aside, Svalbad and Taiwain are the only ones that break the "rule"? That's odd. Is there some dispute about Svalbad or something? Or is Google just being weird?

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    25. Re:Seems so 1995... by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

      Hong Kong was never an independent country. For 150 years it was a British colony, now its China's again. But it has independent taxes, judiciary, customs, immigration, its own TLD (.hk).

    26. Re:Seems so 1995... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I didn't see anything on the Svalbard wikipedia page about any kind of dispute. I think Google is just being inconsistent. Their maps are pretty good, but there's some weird stuff they do sometimes; remember, they refused to put a label on Louisville, Kentucky for years, despite many complaints and news articles about it. They had some dumb excuse IIRC about city vs. county or something, and something about their algorithms, I don't remember any more, but eventually they broke down and stuck a label on it.

    27. Re:Seems so 1995... by unixisc · · Score: 1

      China views Taiwan as a breakaway province of China, and its government as illegitimate.

    28. Re:Seems so 1995... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think when the Indian government objected to a part of Kashmir being shown as a part of Pakistan, that's when Microsoft, not wanting to be shut out of the Indian market, caved and removed that feature. Never mind that that portion of Kashmir is indeed occupied by Pakistan - Indian's can't go there if they want to.

      OpenStreetMaps seems to skirt around this issue by not naming any bodies of water, since they are street maps. They also provide all names in native languages, and in the case of the Gulf, you see writings all in Arabic script (Farsi and Urdu use Arabic script). Apparently, they're assuming that people would only be interested in their local areas.

    29. Re:Seems so 1995... by DamienNightbane · · Score: 0

      If a bunch of tinpot shithole countries that don't even have widespread indoor plumbing were whining to my company about how we mapped disputed borders, I'd tell them to eat shit.

  4. Seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These guys don't have any real problems to deal with?

    1. Re:Seriously by Enry · · Score: 4, Interesting

      We had a group of people that insisted on using the phrase "Freedom Fries", so I don't think the US is one to talk about what's silly or not.

    2. Re:Seriously by Dave+Emami · · Score: 3

      There's a bit of a difference between calling something by a silly name, and threatening legal action against someone. I don't recall anyone from the US State Department (equivalent to the Foreign Ministry, I assume) ever mentioning the matter, much less threatening anyone who avoided the matter by just calling them "fries."

      Though I do wonder: legal action? What are they going to sue Google for? The closet thing I can think of is lack of trademark attribution, which is still light years away from being applicable.

      --

      "The Greens lynched a hacker in Chicago. Last month, but I think the body's still hanging from the old Water Tower."
    3. Re:Seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe, but at the time they weren't threatening to sue either...http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_fries

    4. Re:Seriously by SomePgmr · · Score: 1

      Oh wow, I'd forgotten about that. It really was the dumbest thing ever, but it was good for a giggle at the time.

      Funny how history puts a less humorous, embarrassing patina on it.

    5. Re:Seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a bit of difference, but both are just as retarded.

    6. Re:Seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some of us continued to use the proper term... Cheese Eating Surrender Monkey Fries.

    7. Re:Seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, there are no gays in Iran (they've executed them all), women wear the chadors, and since everything is so hunky dory in Iran, when they're not sweating over what American companies label in their maps, they are busy building a nuclear arsenal, sending fighters to prop up the regime in Syria, buying up most of the Emirates and being Islamic in any way that they can imagine.

    8. Re:Seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are talking about individual citizens expressing their outrage at the French by renaming the fries. I agree that it was silly, since the potatoes weren't imported from France, the French didn't get any richer by Americans continuing to eat French fries, and so it was not even symbolic. They could have just as easily have called it potato chips or something along those lines, and they'd have been fine. But as an aside, it wasn't any part of the US governement demanding this, it was just a few private citizens, and they had every right to rename it whatever they wanted.

    9. Re:Seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, the accurate term is "Belgian Fries."

    10. Re:Seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It wasn't any dumber than Liberty Cabbage.

    11. Re:Seriously by lexa1979 · · Score: 1

      je plussoie !

  5. More Pointlessness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A political hissy fit over that? What a bunch of cry-arses. Why didn't they just ask Google to label that "gulf" in the first place? Is the name of that body of water even commonly acknowledged?

    I want to call the pond in my backyard "George", but it's not labelled as such. I'm going to threaten Google.

  6. Do they mean ... by PPH · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... the Qatar Yacht Basin?

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Do they mean ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought it might be renamed " Purgin' "...

  7. Political Power Ploy or Play... you decide... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I see this as a political ploy by Iran to show that they have influence outside of their country and can control a US based company with a threat of a lawsuit.

    If there is a lawsuit and Iran wins, what do they gain except to change the name of the Gulf to Persian Gulf. But the real question arises, where will the lawsuit be fought if enacted. For if it's in Iran, then Iran is sure to win the favor of judgement, but with no teeth behind the judgement. If it's in the US, a US judge could throw the case out before it ever goes to trial as a frivolous lawsuit.

    What would be the purpose for such a lawsuit, other than to waist time and money, or to lord power over people you don't rule?

    1. Re:Political Power Ploy or Play... you decide... by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Propaganda. A very good way for any political leader or party to gain power is to unify the people behind a common enemy, even if one must be invented. That works regardless of political structure - democracy or dictatorship, it works just the same. To take advantage of this, the government of Iran continually tells the people that their country is under political attack by the corrupt western world, lead by the US. Google is American, and do this case can be spun to support the under-political-war story by portraying the missing label as the lastest example of the US government ordering one of its proxy corporations to insult the nation of Iran and deny them their rightful recognition.

      This legal case isn't supposed to be *won*. It's a big publicity stunt to stir up anti-American sentiment in Iran by trying to give the impression that the US is attacking a much-cherished aspect of cultural identity. It'll probably work, too. We'll all laugh at them here on Slashdot when some US court throws the case out, but over in Iran people will see this as just another case of the US government manipulating the courts to spit in the faces of the Iranian people.

  8. US Government Does it Too by perry64 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I was in the Navy, and after the Shah fell and Iran became a thorn in the side of the U.S., we stopped calling it the Persian Gulf and started calling it the Arabian Gulf. It's still called that by the Navy and U.S. Government to this day.

    As it's bordered roughly on half by Arabian countries and half by Persian (Iran), there's a strong case for either.

    I looked on Google Maps and there isn't a name now, although I don't know if that was that way prior to Iran's actions.

    1. Re:US Government Does it Too by 0racle · · Score: 5, Informative
      Persian Gulf Veterans would like to have a word with you.

      Persian Gulf naming dispute

      "In recent years, due to increased cooperation with Arab states of the Persian Gulf, various branches of the U.S. armed forces have issued directives to their members to use the "Arabian Gulf" when operating in the area ("Persian Gulf" is still used in official publications and websites), partially to follow local conventions, or simply to follow local laws that ban the use of "Persian Gulf", e.g. in the United Arab Emirates."

      As it's bordered roughly on half by Arabian countries and half by Persian (Iran), there's a strong case for either.

      Well I suppose if you ignore everything else, including the fact that up until the 60's those Arabian countries were perfectly fine with the name, then yes, they have just a strong claim.

      It has been called the Persian Gulf since around 550 BC.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    2. Re:US Government Does it Too by darkmeridian · · Score: 1

      But when we go to war, it's definitely with the Persian Gulf. At least twice, of course. Or is it best out of five?

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    3. Re:US Government Does it Too by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Thing is, the attested use of the term "Persian Sea" or "Persian Gulf" dates back at least to the Roman Empire - and was universally used by all Western countries and all Arab countries. The idea that it should be renamed "Arabian" is a 20-century Arab nationalist rallying cry. I don't see any reason to break from historical usage to appease someone's newly-found sensitivities. When US appeared as an independent country, we didn't rename the Gulf of Mexico, for example.

    4. Re:US Government Does it Too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google doesn't work for the Iranian government. They can name it anything they want. Such as "Gulf of a-holes", which would be appropriate.

    5. Re:US Government Does it Too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Understandable, but still stupid. This would be like the US getting all pissy about the name "Gulf of Mexico".

    6. Re:US Government Does it Too by jdgeorge · · Score: 1

      When US appeared as an independent country, we didn't rename the Gulf of Mexico, for example.

      Hmmm.... I smell an opportunity to score some cheap nationalist political points. It's never too late to do something retarded....

    7. Re:US Government Does it Too by fgb · · Score: 1

      >> It has been called the Persian Gulf since around 550 BC.

      Good point. Maybe Google should go back to the original owners and name it the "Gulf of Mesopotamia."

    8. Re:US Government Does it Too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When a country completely disregards the norms and standards of international diplomacy by kidnapping and holding diplomatic personnel as hostages for over a year, then that country can take the lumps that the international community gives it.

      The barbarians in Iran didn't start giving a damn about what the global community thinks about them until now. Allah not providing? Well, try the Revolution.

      As far as I'm concerned, the government and the people - all of them - there can choke on the decision that they made 30 years ago. If they want my respect, they can overthrow their government (and murder a shitload of the fuckers who put them in their state), end the institutionalized discrimination of religious minorities in Iran (strike that constitutional article against Baha'is in government) and apologize - on their knees, publicly, in the most humiliating way possible - for their unlawful kidnapping and detention of US Department of State personnel.

      Fuck Iran. Feed it to Russia.

    9. Re:US Government Does it Too by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      I propose we rename the disputed water as 'Sea of Dugongs.' It's descriptive, politically neutral, and can be translated into any language quite easily so every country can use their own alphabet.

    10. Re:US Government Does it Too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US may have done some dumb things in recent wars, but declaring a body of water the enemy isn't one of them.

    11. Re:US Government Does it Too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was a Google Maps back then? Were they giant lizards also?

  9. Ummm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It says Persian Gulf in Google Earth.

  10. Love it. by SomePgmr · · Score: 1

    'omitting the name Persian Gulf is (like) playing with the feelings and realities of the Iranian nation.' - Ministry spokesman Ramin Mehmanparast

    To which Google replied... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UkbabSAvhDg

  11. My street name is misspelled by cupantae · · Score: 1

    It used to be right, and then they added in an extra g for some reason. I wrote a message on the Google Maps "support" forum and never got a response. I'd say Mehmanparast just had the same experience that I did, but overreacted a little.

    I mean, you'd have to be crazy to actually want to sue, wouldn't you?

    --
    --
    1. Re:My street name is misspelled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a similar problem, and it was corrected within a week or two. They have an email address for maps corrections somewhere or other, try that instead of the forums.

    2. Re:My street name is misspelled by jdgeorge · · Score: 1

      Good advice from the AC. Here's the link that tells you how to report a map data error.

  12. LABEL IT AYATOLLA ASSAHOLA GULF OF PERSIAN SHIT !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And we can all go on now !! Everyone happy !! Even Hwhill Hwheaton !!

  13. Name By Client Location by Githaron · · Score: 1

    While Iran trying to take legal action about this is just dumb, why doesn't Google just label it with multiple names or simply show the name based on the location of the client?

  14. Persian vs Arabian by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 4, Informative

    Some of the countries on the South shore of the gulf want it to be referred to as the Arabian Gulf. Which pisses off the Iranians (as intended) who prefer to call it the Persian Gulf. Google is avoiding picking sides by leaving it unlabeled.

    --
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    1. Re:Persian vs Arabian by stanlyb · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Do you remember Alexander Makedonsky? Who fighted against, guess who, Persia? So guess what, it is Persian Gulf, it will be Persian Gulf, it was Persian Gulf when there was not even English language at all.

    2. Re:Persian vs Arabian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      In your case, there still is no English language at all.

    3. Re:Persian vs Arabian by Forty+Two+Tenfold · · Score: 1, Funny

      [...] fighted against Persia [...] when there was not even English language at all.

      Oh, yes </asshole-mode>

      --
      Upward mobility is a slippery slope - the higher you climb the more you show your ass.
    4. Re:Persian vs Arabian by hazah · · Score: 0

      Give him a break, he's probably Pharsi.

    5. Re:Persian vs Arabian by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 5, Informative

      It is not the only such place, either - Sea of Japan is unlabeled as well (I assume because Korea takes an issue with that label, preferring to call it "Eastern Sea").

    6. Re:Persian vs Arabian by slack_justyb · · Score: 3

      Excellent point! Indeed the Sea of Japan is unlabeled for the exact same reason. The name of the body of water is disputed. You deserve mod points!

    7. Re:Persian vs Arabian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congrats. You not only got asshole mode right, you nailed dimwitted fucktard mode.

    8. Re:Persian vs Arabian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, this all could be avoided if they named it the "Prince of Persia: Gulf", sponsored by EA.

    9. Re:Persian vs Arabian by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Yeah and the Chinese like to call it the Sea of China. Which both sides don't like. They should just call it the North Yellow Sea and be done with it.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    10. Re:Persian vs Arabian by White+Flame · · Score: 1

      Why don't they just put both labels on it?

    11. Re:Persian vs Arabian by busyqth · · Score: 1

      Alexander Makedonsky defeated Persia, so maybe it should be called the Macedonian Gulf.

    12. Re:Persian vs Arabian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Because there would be an actual shooting war (proxy IED battle?) over which was listed first, is it right to left or left to right, do you use the Persian or Arabian alphabet (trick question), and dammit, who does Allah love more anyhow!

    13. Re:Persian vs Arabian by need4mospd · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sorry that name was taken after my 10 year old's last pool party.

    14. Re:Persian vs Arabian by poity · · Score: 5, Funny

      Makedonsky was nothing. Genghis Mongolovski was more greater. Guess who he fighted? The EVERYBODY! He maked Turks very pride, so now Persian jealous and not call it real name, Mongol Gulf.

      --
      your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
    15. Re:Persian vs Arabian by Sir_Sri · · Score: 1

      Usually what they do is simply return different results depending on where you're from and people don't know differently. I presume they have either stopped doing that in general or in this case there's no clear agreement even based on where you are what the official name is. (Obviously in Iran it's the 'persian gulf' but the US, EU and UN may not have any official position on the matter as it's not a territorial dispute, it's just a terminology dispute).

      Even if they do have an officially recognized name the relevant data entry guy at google might not have bothered to look it up, or google just doesn't care all that much and figured this was at least likely to make everyone equally mad.

    16. Re:Persian vs Arabian by Wandering+Voice · · Score: 1

      A few years ago, 2007 iirc, National Geographic labeld the Persian Gulf as the Arabian Gulf on one of their maps or something. I remember reading about them getting some angry comments from readers about playing political games.

    17. Re:Persian vs Arabian by ACS+Solver · · Score: 2

      /rant mode on
      GP is probably Russian - quit pointing out unimportant grammar errors as if they diminish his actual point. His English is likely better than your Russian, or whatever GP's first language is.
      /rant mode off

    18. Re:Persian vs Arabian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His English is likely better than your Russian, or whatever GP's first language is.

      This will be a valid argument when Forty Two Tenfold starts posting in mangled Russian to a Russian-language forum, not before.

    19. Re:Persian vs Arabian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AC is fucktard... news at 11

    20. Re:Persian vs Arabian by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Is this the same reason they left Louisville, Kentucky unlabeled for many years? Was there some controversy, with Ohio wanting to call the city something else?

    21. Re:Persian vs Arabian by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      This isn't a list on a document, it's labels on a map. They could easily put both names in, closer to the respective countries that prefer those names. So "Persian Gulf" would appear near the Iranian shore, and "Arabian Gulf" would appear near the southern shore.

    22. Re:Persian vs Arabian by HornWumpus · · Score: 3, Funny

      Better yet. Label it 'Persian Gulf' in Farsi, 'Arabian Gulf' in Arabic and 'Greater Israel Mega Fjord' in Hebrew.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    23. Re:Persian vs Arabian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The CIA World Factbook seems (based on crude googling) to refer to it as the Persian Gulf.

    24. Re:Persian vs Arabian by portforward · · Score: 1

      This comment doesn't deserve a 5 funny rating; it deserves a 6.

    25. Re:Persian vs Arabian by jrumney · · Score: 1

      Which is no diffferent to the unlabelled Sea of Japan.

    26. Re:Persian vs Arabian by JWSmythe · · Score: 2

          That's a whole new pissing match. Why is your "Arabian Gulf" shown in our "Persian Gulf". The same could be said about the other names, "The Gulf", "Gulf of Iran", "Jama Sea", "Pars Sea", "Persian Sea".

          In 2006, the UN agreed that the body of water is to be known as the "Persian Gulf". Then it becomes a question of, is Google responsible for international negotiations on naming rights and the proper name for every place? Leaving a disputed location unmarked can be problematic.

          It would probably be best for known disputed locations, a mark saying "Disputed territory" followed by the names accepted by all involved parties, in alphabetical order.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    27. Re:Persian vs Arabian by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Has the UN decided on a name for the Sea of Japan? I wonder how that compares.

    28. Re:Persian vs Arabian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nah, it's because the proper pronuniciation of "Louisville" involves the omission of all of the vowels and most of the consonants. It's hard to come to a consensus on exactly which spelling will accurately reflect how the residents pronounce the name of their city.

    29. Re:Persian vs Arabian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is all just too farken funny for a festive Friday lazy afternoon...:))))
      --
      Tomislav the original Slav (Adriatic is ours or we kilj you farken!!!)

    30. Re:Persian vs Arabian by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          As best as I can tell, the UN still considers it an open topic. At least as of 2004. They wrote a letter to Japan saying that Japan should use "Sea of Japan" in it's official documents. They also wrote a letter to South Korea reaffirming its neutrality to the decision making.

          Basically, if Japan wants to call it Sea of Japan, they can, and obviously will. As for the official stance of the UN, it doesn't have one. They're letting the interested parties settle it.

          That may be because it's a slightly different situation. When it was named, Korea was part of Japan until 1945. Pesky world wars and all that.

          Land wars in the middle east, and their adjoining waters have been in dispute ... well ... forever.

          The best advice, or as once said by an almost wise fictional man in a fictional book ...

      "Never get involved in a land war in Asia"
      - Vizzini

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    31. Re:Persian vs Arabian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In different books, I've seen both being used, and Google Maps leaves it completely unlabelled. In any case, it should not be called Persian - Persia stopped being Persia when the Arabs Islamized it. Let them call it the Gulf of Islam.

    32. Re:Persian vs Arabian by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      Mod parentovsky even upper!

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    33. Re:Persian vs Arabian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Israelis are not stupid enough to want to name geographic tracts nowhere near their country. The first 2 suggestions were good - use 'Persian Gulf' in Farsi, 'Arabian Gulf' in Arabic, while in English and other languages, use either name near either costs - Persian Gulf near Iran, and Arabians Gulf near Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Emirates.

    34. Re:Persian vs Arabian by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Can't they pick a different label according to the user or user's IP address? Just like the language or guessed country settings? And if the users log in they can have the entire world labelled the way they want (and perhaps provide more nutjob candidates for the FBI to trick into "terrorist" plots).

      --
    35. Re:Persian vs Arabian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is babby formed?

    36. Re:Persian vs Arabian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If there was no English, how could it be called the Persian Gulf? I presume it was called something else that has been translated to Persian Gulf.

    37. Re:Persian vs Arabian by blane.bramble · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't that make it the Meerkat Gulf, or am I getting my Aleksandr's consfused?

    38. Re:Persian vs Arabian by hazah · · Score: 1

      Flamebait? I actually meant what I said. Give him a break! There's no flaming going on here.

    39. Re:Persian vs Arabian by David+Chappell · · Score: 1

      Do you remember Alexander Makedonsky? Who fighted against, guess who, Persia? So guess what, it is Persian Gulf, it will be Persian Gulf, it was Persian Gulf when there was not even English language at all.

      I think you mean Alexander of Macedonia. In English he is sometimes called Alexander of Macedonia, but he is more well know as Alexander the Great. If Makedonsky were a Russian surname, it would be appropriate to leave it untranslated. But since it is not, you must translate it into English if you want to be understood.

    40. Re:Persian vs Arabian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because then they would fight over which label went first?

    41. Re:Persian vs Arabian by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Because there would be an actual shooting war (proxy IED battle?) over which was listed first, is it right to left or left to right, do you use the Persian or Arabian alphabet (trick question), and dammit, who does Allah love more anyhow!

      Of you write "Persian Gulf" to the left in English next to "Arabian Gulf" in Arabic to the right, both of them are listed first!

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    42. Re:Persian vs Arabian by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      What if the Iranians and Arabs jointly named it the "Certainly Not Israeli Gulf"? That could get broad support on both sides.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    43. Re:Persian vs Arabian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In another note, it would have been called 'Lake New York' except that we had support from California.

    44. Re:Persian vs Arabian by Summitlake · · Score: 1

      Pretty childish excuse on Google's part. As I recall it was the "Persian Gulf" when I was a kid. I always wondered where the "Arabian Gulf" was. Maybe when Iran stops executing innocents they can get a leg to stand on. Sosumi.

    45. Re:Persian vs Arabian by mysidia · · Score: 1

      [AP][er][as][ib][ia][na]n? Gulf

      APerasibianan Gulf

      Or just "* Gulf" for short; or hell just make "Gulf" the label.

    46. Re:Persian vs Arabian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better yet. Label it 'Persian Gulf' in Farsi, 'Arabian Gulf' in Arabic and 'Greater Israel Mega Fjord' in Hebrew.

      retard much?

  15. Re:This just in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Americans decide what other countries should find important, yet again. The world doesn't give a shit what you think, about what they think.

  16. That's Funny! by DaMattster · · Score: 1

    I read the headline and had a belly laugh to the point of hurting. What kind of legal action can they really take? I guess they could indict a few Google executives in their Sharia Court of Law which will amount to precisely nothing. In fact, I imagine Sergey Brin is laughing at this too. About the only thing Iran can do is rattle its sabre again to drive oil prices back up over a hundred bucks a barrel.

  17. I got totally lost by Drunkulus · · Score: 1

    For once I have to agree with the Ayatollah. I was trying to get from the Gulf of Oman to my golf game in Kuwait, and Google Maps took me around the Cape of Good Hope. I barely had time to grab a cocktail before teeing off.

  18. Google is anti-European! by Dr.+Gamera · · Score: 1

    Google is anti-European! There's no label on the largest lake in Europe, Lake Ladoga!

    Or, you know, it could be just a cartographic layout decision, just as the lack of a label on the Persian Gulf is.

    1. Re:Google is anti-European! by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      There's no layout decisions there, since the map is zoomable. They can always start showing the label at certain zoom levels - only they don't, even when other bodies of water of smaller size do at the same level.

      Nah, it's just Google trying to dodge the bullet. If they use "Persian Gulf", then Egypt etc will get mad at them. So they don't label it either way.

    2. Re:Google is anti-European! by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      No, that is one probably Google incompetence, just like how the city of Louisville, Kentucky didn't have a label for years.

  19. Quid Pro Quo by AnalogDreams · · Score: 0

    Google just wants Ahmadinejad to admit to the holocaust, then they can have their precious label.

  20. Re:This just in... by Jack9 · · Score: 2

    this is real life. You can choose not to participate.

    --

    Often wrong but never in doubt.
    I am Jack9.
    Everyone knows me.
  21. Turkey threatened HP over Kurdish Language by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I used to work for HP, and the Turkish government threatened to ban our Debian-based thin clients because one of the language options with Kurdish. Apparently, the Turks are so sensitive about the Kurds that even having the language option appear in the list was unacceptable within their country. They refuse to acknowledge the Kurds, so they try to wipe out any evidence within Turkey that they ever existed, past or present.

    1. Re:Turkey threatened HP over Kurdish Language by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      I forgot to mention that I believe the solution we came up with was to have a special branch in our code base that was identical to the trunk, with the single exception being that the Kurdish language was removed. We mercilessly mocked Turkey for weeks over the absurdity of their childish demands.

    2. Re:Turkey threatened HP over Kurdish Language by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      First they want to wipe out the Armenians, now they want to wipe out the Kurds. Those Turks sound like a bunch of jerks.

    3. Re:Turkey threatened HP over Kurdish Language by coredog64 · · Score: 1

      You're an Amenian genocide denier denier?! Man, I hope you never try to travel to Turkey. Didn't you see that move "Midnight Express"? Your visit will be like that, only less pleasant.

  22. It's a SCO type ploy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once they get everyone to call it The Persian Gulf, Iran will then change its name to a variant of "The Persian Empire" (maybe "PE Iran") in order to lay claim to it. There will be lawsuits over naming, then lawsuits over usage rights. At some point, Ahmadinejad will claim to have proof of ownership in his briefcase.

  23. "BOWSRTATPG" (after Prince) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Body Of Water Sometimes Referred To As The Persian Gulf

  24. New Name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I propose we call it "that fucking gulf in the middle east that we can't decide on a name for"

    Sure it's a tad bit wordy but I believe it accurately reflects its current status.

  25. In related news by amstrad · · Score: 0

    ... Google relabels Iran as Dumbfuckistan just to play "with the feelings and realities of the Iranian nation".

  26. Meanwhile at Google.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... not a fuck was given.

  27. Solution for all by freeze128 · · Score: 2

    Just label it "Water". It's all connected anyway.

  28. Google is even more anti-Australian! by Dr.+Gamera · · Score: 1

    Google is even more anti-Australian than anti-European! You can't even find the Gulf of Carpentaria on a Google Maps search!

    It actually turns out that there is a whole naming dispute over the Persian Gulf: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persian_Gulf_naming_dispute

  29. I think I'll sue the Iranians... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think I'll sue the Iranians for calling Persia....Iran.

  30. ..why not call it the Persian gulf? by foradoxium · · Score: 1

    This is stupid..it'd been the Persian Gulf for a long time, why change it. It'd be like people demanding we change the name of the Gulf of Mexico to "Gulf of Texas".

    It's a freaking body of water that everyone uses..can we just label the thing the Persian Gulf and move on to more important issues?

    1. Re:..why not call it the Persian gulf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i know right? just like renaming palestine to isreal...

    2. Re:..why not call it the Persian gulf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know right? Just like renaming Yugoslavia to Serbia...

    3. Re:..why not call it the Persian gulf? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Because our masters in the Arabian countries to the south want us to call it the Arabian Gulf or Arabian Sea instead.

    4. Re:..why not call it the Persian gulf? by goofyspouse · · Score: 1

      i know right? just like renaming palestine to isreal...

      Better than isfake, I guess.

  31. Idiotic media spin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When USA media publish stories about Iran, it is always stories that either make them look like a bunch of evil terrorists or complete idiots.

    I wonder if they do the same things there when one of your right wing nuts say something stupid in the media or when there is a shooting in one of your school?

    1. Re:Idiotic media spin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shouldn't you be standing by a well somewhere waiting for #12 to pop out? The difference between Iran and the US is that while we have plenty of religious nuts, many of whom work in the government, your government enshrines religious wackery. While we have a disgusting Baptist "church" that proclaims "God Hates Fags", you have a "government" that hangs them.

  32. Google vs. nationalist stupidity by Vintermann · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Oh, the many ways to provoke a nationalist!

    I used to hang out on the Google translate forum. Every week there would be some loony nationalist who was deeply offended that

    * His language was not implemented (Turks, mostly)
    * His language was not implemented to his satisfaction (Lithuanians in particular. "Our language is the most complex in the world!")
    * An "enemy" language was implemented ("Macedonian is not a language! It is a dialect of Bulgarian!" - said by Greeks)
    * Their national anthem inexplicably got the words "God Save The Queen" inserted into them (an Irishman, memorably)
    * etc.

    In any case, the only explanation which they would accept was a deep conspiracy at Google to taunt and slight their proud nations.

    --
    xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    1. Re:Google vs. nationalist stupidity by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

      I want to shake the hand of the guy who wrote the code that added 'god save the queen' to the Irish national anthem. That's brilliant.

      How do you say 'god save the queen' in Gaelic? 'Dia shábháil banríon' according to Google translate (Irish is a language?).

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    2. Re:Google vs. nationalist stupidity by Vintermann · · Score: 1

      No one deliberately added it. It's a creepy consequence of statistical translation. The program noticed that "Hey, there are a lot of pompous, nationalist words in this thing, what's the equivalent of these pompous, nationalist words in English?". It basically realized it was looking at an anthem, and translated bits of it into the British anthem.

      I ran some other anthems through it at the time, to test. It definitely did stuff to them. The Icelandic, for Instance: In the English translation, duplicate lines would be replaced in this way:

      Original:

      Íslands thúsund ár,
      Íslands thúsund ár!

      Translation:

      Iceland's thousand years,
      Hiduplah!

      Turns out hiduplah is an Indonesian word meaning "long live!" or similar. Why the translator thought it was English I have no idea, but it got the general sentimental anthem spirit right.

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
  33. WTF? by gstoddart · · Score: 2

    In what court is Iran going so sue Google? Does Google have a presence in Iran? Or are they going to send lawyers over to the Great Satan and file in their jurisdiction? That would be hilarious -- country has feelings hurt by multinational company.

    If I look on google Maps, Tibet is labelled as Tibet ... not the "northern resource area" or whatever China calls it. I still refer to it as Burma, not Myanmar.

    omitting the name Persian Gulf is (like) playing with the feelings and realities of the Iranian nation

    And therein lies the rub ... countries don't have feelings. Getting all butt-hurt because the rest of the world won't label things to match what you want them to is childish and petulant ... but I guess that's pretty much Iran's foreign policy.

    The Foreign Ministry spokesman has a tiny penis, and a brain to match.

    I'd kind of like to see Sasha Baron Cohen as the Dictator simply reading the public statements which have come out of Iran over the last several years -- that would be bloody hilarious. Or, totally indistinguishable from the real thing.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  34. What sort of legal action? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

    What sort of legal action, exactly, can you take against somebody for making a map that hurts your feelings?

    I've never heard of any legal success in the US on those grounds(though PR concerns certainly motivate companies to tread lightly) and under the present US sanctions, Google is unlikely to be officially operating within Iran at all(given the SSL MiTM incident a while back, there are obviously Iranians using Google services; but the sanctions make it rather unlikely that Google would choose to site any official branch offices there), so it hardly matters whether Iran has a rule against hurting their feelings in the process of mapping.

    1. Re:What sort of legal action? by Sentrion · · Score: 2

      They threatened "legal action" but that doesn't mean they have to file suit in US courts. Iran is a sovereign nation and they follow Sharia law. The Ayatollah can issue a Fatwa to "all believers" to murder Google execs anywhere they are found.

      Reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fatwas

    2. Re:What sort of legal action? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Certainly, if you are willing to use violence you can do whatever you can get away with. However, while Sharia pretty much sucks by humanist standards, it is subject to its own internal mores and isn't arbitrarily flexible. In this case, the limiting factor(beyond the basic 'Does the idea that Mohammed gave a damn what an internet search company in the early 21st century called that body of water even pass the laugh test?' problem) would likely be that this particular question of naming is an internal spat.

      The leading contenders are "Persian Gulf", favored by ethnic nationalists in Persian-majority Iran, and "Arabian Gulf", favored by assorted ethnic nationalists in Arab-majority areas of the middle east. That(along with the not-so-minor fact that you also have Shia/Sunni split) would probably get a Fatwa endorsed by some Iranian theologian laughed right out of court among a substantial majority of the world's Muslims, never mind everybody else. This wouldn't be one of those unifying issues, like being against Rushdie or thinking that Israel pretty much sucks.

      Some sort of civil-law 'actions calculated to destabilize the state' nonsense would probably be a lot easier to kangaroo-court through; but then Google would need to have some sort of operations within Iranian jurisdiction.

  35. Should change their name by Sentrion · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They should change their name from IRAN to IRAA. Then we would be scared of their threats. Next thing North KORAA will be taking legal action against the New York Times for referring to them as a "Stalinist dictatorship " [1.]

    1. http://www.nytimes.com/2003/10/02/international/asia/02CND-KORE.html?ex=1380513600&en=a29d7f1e49aabee0&ei=5007&partner=USERLAND

  36. Google.ir by TheAngryMob · · Score: 3, Funny

    My suggestion for Google,

    Searches for "Persian Gulf" on Google.ir are going to return:

    "Did you mean: 'How to violently overthrow an idiotic, oppressive regime'?"

    --

    Don't just game, Dungeoneer
    1. Re:Google.ir by vik · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I think there are a lot of Americans wanting to overthrow an idiotic and oppressive regime with secret prisons and officially condoned torture. They won't have to go very far to do it.

    2. Re:Google.ir by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Worth noting that Iran meets your criteria just as well.

    3. Re:Google.ir by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think there are a lot of Americans wanting to overthrow an idiotic and oppressive regime with secret prisons and officially condoned torture. They won't have to go very far to do it.

      Of course, there's that pesky international incident that doesn't allow me to think of Iran as anything but a nation of spoiled little brats. But they're all peace loving, right?

      Feed Iran to Russia.

    4. Re:Google.ir by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's no www.google.ir, but there's www.google.com/fa

  37. hell yea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they should totally take out a full page ad demanding just that!

  38. Pigs, Beer, Fornication and Atheism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google should label it "The Gulf of Pigs, Beer, Fornication and Atheism" and then say to Iran, "Put that in your pipe and smoke it!"

    And "Women's Lib." And dancing and loud popular music.

    1. Re:Pigs, Beer, Fornication and Atheism by Sentrion · · Score: 0

      To really offend the Iranians, they should call it the "Gulf of Bush". Oh, wait, that would offend just about everyone here on Slashdot as well, including myself.

    2. Re:Pigs, Beer, Fornication and Atheism by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      They could just label it the "Gulf of Google".

  39. true nature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So they are complaining about a free service??

  40. Search Google Maps for... by sdguero · · Score: 1

    "Persian Gulf" It may not be labeled but that term certainly works.

  41. Re:This just in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apparently someone does give a shit or we wouldn't be reading about an American company's map labels.

  42. In related news... by tlambert · · Score: 1

    "The spokesperson would not name any other specific areas that are not labeled."

    In related news, the members of the band "America" have issued a press release declining to give the name of the horse in the song "A Horse With No Name".

    -- Terry

  43. Arab vs. Persian . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great video explaining the difference . . .

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r6qZ-PYBrMw

  44. Ask nicely? Maybe you'll get what they want. by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 1

    Unless you're just looking for a fight, getting all pissy about it first isn't the best way to get what you want.

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
  45. Compromise? by seyfarth · · Score: 1

    Well, I doubt that the factions could agree on anything, but I think, in the interests of providing information, Google could place both Persian Gulf and Arabian Gulf in the same part of the ocean. The labels are somewhat meaningless anyway since there is in truth only 1 ocean on the planet.

    --
    Ray Seyfarth, ray.seyfarth@gmail.com, http://rayseyfarth.blogspot.com
  46. Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  47. here kitty kitty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have an Iranian cat?

  48. From search engine to political puppet by perles · · Score: 1

    Shame on you Google! Political division has nothing to do with politics, even though the words share the same root.

  49. Iran is right on this one by cpghost · · Score: 1

    Just because we don't like their current islamist regime, doesn't mean they aren't right w.r.t. the name of the Gulf. It has been "Persian Gulf" for most of the History, and Google really ought to respect that. Now, suing Google is pretty pointless, if Iran doesn't have diplomatic ties with the US, but that's another story altogether.

    --
    cpghost at Cordula's Web.
  50. All official US sources say Persian Gulf by andersh · · Score: 4, Informative

    The White House, Department of Defense, the State department and the CIA beg to differ.

    The Department of Defense says "Navy Looks to Bolster Capabilities in Persian Gulf" (2012):
    http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=67586

    The State Department notes in a briefing by Secretary of State Clinton on her visit to India in May 2012 that peace in the Persian Gulf is important:
    http://translations.state.gov/st/english/texttrans/2012/05/201205085219.html#axzz1vAEAsbH0

    The White House's press briefing includes references to carriers in the Persian Gulf (2012):
    http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/04/09/press-briefing-press-secretary-jay-carney-4912/

    This is the CIA's World Fact Book entry for Iran. Look at the map saying "Persian Gulf".
    https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/ir.html

    The State Department shows the same map for Iran ("Persian Gulf"):
    http://www.state.gov/p/nea/ci/ir/

    The CIA's Persian Gulf War Task Force was last reviewed and updated in January 2012.
    https://www.cia.gov/library/reports/general-reports-1/gulfwar/index.htm

  51. My globe agrees with Iran. by allcoolnameswheretak · · Score: 0

    I have a very old globe on my desk, from the 1930's I think, on which it is labeled "Persian Gulf".

    1. Re:My globe agrees with Iran. by Eponymous+Hero · · Score: 1

      cool story bro.

      --
      insensitive clod overlords obligatory xkcd car analogy russian reversals whoosh pedant fanbois ftfy in 3...2...1..PROFIT
  52. oppressive regime change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You do realize that before they had an idiotic, oppressive regime they had a tolerant, enlightened democracy, but the US didn't like that, so they replaced their president with the Shah, a dictator. When the people finally rose up against their oppressors, another oppressive regime took power, so the Iranians still have some work to do.

    1. Re:oppressive regime change by Eponymous+Hero · · Score: 1

      did they have a guy who discovered how to harness electricity with a key tied to a kite? cuz this story sounds familiar.

      --
      insensitive clod overlords obligatory xkcd car analogy russian reversals whoosh pedant fanbois ftfy in 3...2...1..PROFIT
  53. Supporting the crazies on this one. by godglike · · Score: 1

    Please Google, please please please, label it the Persian Gulf.

    Everything that is Persia pre-dates Islam and shows that Persia was great without the help of Allah.

    Long before the mullahs Persia ruled most of the civilised world in the west, with the mullahs its a bit player in a sideshow.

    Everything Persian undermines the regime in Tehran, so...

    Please Google, please please please, label it the Persian Gulf. And call the middle east "greater Persia", and Afghanistan Inland Persia, and Tehran the Persian Capital, and Iran the Persian Empire.

    Also, can we sell Greece back to Persia? They wanted it a while back and its really no use to us anymore?

    1. Re:Supporting the crazies on this one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let all Persians convert back to Zoroastrianism, like they were before the Muslim savages poured in, and that would be a major beginning of a solution.

  54. Where are they going to sue Google? by BLToday · · Score: 1

    In Iran? Non-Iranian websites are already blocked in Iran, so it's not like people in Iran will see it on Google Maps. And it's the Iranians won't in a US court. Maybe France since the French don't like American companies.

  55. Iran is embaressing themselves again. by Karmashock · · Score: 1

    What are they afraid of? That people are going to call it the Israeli gulf?

    Get a grip, psychos.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  56. Re:Iran is wrong on this one by Eponymous+Hero · · Score: 1

    technically, they're wrong. they assert that the the label was removed. this is false. the label was never put there to begin with. and it was never put there to begin with precisely to avoid the stupid, childish bickering over the term persian vs arabian. iran's diplomats should be tried under sharia law for wasting allah's time. if it were my maps, i'd make the label say Gulf of Fucktard Politics.

    --
    insensitive clod overlords obligatory xkcd car analogy russian reversals whoosh pedant fanbois ftfy in 3...2...1..PROFIT
  57. Brazil complains about Google's place names by Animats · · Score: 1

    The algorithm that picks the place names shown in Google Maps uses population as an input. So the prominent places in Rio de Janeiro are all the slums - Favela Moreira Pinto, Favela Pedra Lisa, Favela Rato ("Rat Town")... Compare this tourist-oriented map, which emphasizes the beaches, parks, and museums. There's been some whining about this from the Rio tourism authorities, but Google didn't change anything.

  58. Solution: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Gulf of Oman leads directly into the Gulf of Kuwait with no Arabian or Persian gulfs in between.

  59. Sandnigger Golf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just call it Sandnigger Golf and piss everyone off (You included spelling nazi).

  60. Please show some manners by InspectorGadget1964 · · Score: 0

    Fortunately, you are not Google. So we will not be seeing any of your vulgarity nor lack of imagination nor lack of knowledge about geography in Google maps. Perhaps you should try reading some history (Please do not use books written by yankee historians) and widen your intellectual horizons (Provided you have some) before you make senseless comments like that. The Persian Gulf has been called that foe centuries and a company like Google should acknowledge the fact. On the other hand, I see no reason for any legal action against a company just because their staff is ignorant, after all, they are yanks.

  61. Japanese vs Korean by unixisc · · Score: 1

    Who disputes it? The Koreans? The Chinese? China doesn't border any part of that Sea. Russia does, but they have plenty of seas that they could rename the Sea of Russia. Only ones I can think of are the Koreans, but had there been no Japan, there would have been no sea - it would simply have been a part of the Pacific Ocean, just like the sea west of LA.

    1. Re:Japanese vs Korean by slack_justyb · · Score: 3, Informative

      The Koreans dispute the name, mainly the South Koreans. Like all naming disputes, it doesn't matter the lands that border them, it's mostly a political and pride issue. Koreans dislike the name because the name for the body of water arose when Korea was under Japaneese rule, so it is kind of a reminder to them of that period. Not all things in this world are based on sound reasoning. Just a hint of research on your part would have clued you in on this, however, I have the fortune to actually remember this point from high school days. Ah, memories!

    2. Re:Japanese vs Korean by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      Having been working at sea a couple of years ago, for the Koreans, near the (disputed) median line ; having seen the Japanese gunboats prowling around to within around a half-kilometer of the vessel (we were very close to the disputed median line) ; having had the daily overflights by large unidentified planes at a couple of hundred feet altitude, I can say from personal experience that there is a dispute.

      We had a couple of technical staff on board from Japan, who told me that the basis of the dispute was whether certain nubbins of rock are "inhabited" or not ; the case isn't quite as silly as Britain's claim to huge swathes of the NE Atlantic on the basis that "Britain has Rockall" (try singing it ; it's an old joke), but it's in the same league.

      Why does anyone care?

      • 1. Currently, fishing rights. Every night, the sea would be lit up by squid boats ; obviously significantly productive.
      • 2. In prospect, oil and gas. South Korea want to have their own Deepwater Horizons, and this is as good place as they've got to get it.

      There is a similar dispute between S.Korea and China over the "West Sea" (to the S.Koreans)/ Yellow Sea (to the Chinese). Exactly the same reasons.

      I don't know if the North Koreans are in dispute with the Chinese similarly over their part of the Yellow Sea/ Gulf of Bohai ; on the other side of the peninsula, there's more room for a large EEZ for both Japan and North Korea, so much smaller grounds for dispute.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  62. China Seas by unixisc · · Score: 1

    Yellow Sea is already the Sea b/w Korea and China, so it would have to be renamed West Yellow Sea, and Sea of Japan would have to be renamed East Yellow Sea. Note that there are already 2 Sea of Chinas - the East China Sea and the South China Sea. Maybe merge Yellow Sea and East China Sea and rename the combination to Sea of China, and rename South China Sea as IndoChina Sea, since it's b/w Vietnam, Philippines, Taiwan, and China.

  63. Confiscated my lonely planet. Re:Seems so 1995... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heck, China x-rayed my backpack when I was leaving via a WALKING border to Vietnam. Nice big airport style x-ray machine sitting there. The nice young woman asked to see the thick book and insisted on confiscating it.. my Lonely Planet. It showed Taiwan as a separate country. This was LEAVING the country! I explained that she was simply doubling the sales of the book but to no avail.

  64. In a related story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A group of guinea pigs is suing to force everyone to stop calling any subject of an experiment a "guinea pig", to stop them calling anyone a "guinea" as a racial epithet, and to stop calling anyone a "pig" as a personal insult. I'm sure they'll be just as successful as the Iranians.

    Next, the North Koreans will sue, insisting people stop thinking about them as a backwards country led by a retarded grandson of a retarded peasant whose only claim to glory (the basis of them choosing him as their leader) was that he was standing on top of a tank when the two powers proxy-fighting nearby both simultaneously retreated to lick their respective wounds. The retards who made him their leader actually thought he had something to do with it, basically installing him as King Dipshit Batshit Badhaircut the first...

    Or something... I wasn't there, I admit, so I could just be fartalking...

  65. Soccer League by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I recently found out that they also renamed their top flight soccer league to "Persian Gulf Cup" in order to promote that label. Even the official logo for the league was changed to a new one depicting the gulf.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_Pro_League#History

  66. Lawsuit, Pretty Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where will they file it? In the USA? They have billions of dolars of judgments against IRAN in the USA for Embassy Terror bombings, even if they won against Google they would never collect it. My attorney got a $2.7 billion dollar judgement against them in 2007 for victums, still trying to seize assets in USA already frozen by the US Government since the hostage crisis.

  67. And I'm sure by Somebody+is+Grar · · Score: 1

    they can win in any court in the world... LOL

    --
    Grar II
  68. It's always & in perpetuity remain Persian Gu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can your site become nameless?
    Can you become nameless?
    Can your place of birth or your country become nameless?
    With this nasty & senseless job that Google has done, it is not only insulting & disrespecting about 80 millions of Iranian, but also ignored the history's truth as well. Before this event, we had very good impression of Google, but now we are totally, heartily & deeply hurt, disappointed & disgusted with this site. Hope Google will soon be remorseful for this intentionally committed mistake and do apologized from all Iranian, so that it may be able to convert this 80 million Iranians enemies to friends again. Just keep in mind that you can not withhold the evergreen an ancient fact or ignore the truth & history 's evidence from the people for the propose of self interests & dirty politics.
    And remember that Persian Gulf is always & for ever & ever & ever remains Persian Gulf & nobody is allowed to ignore the Persian Gulf or make it nameless. Long live Iran & The Persian Gulf
    From Dr. s.k.sajadian, Tehran, Iran