'First Base' In Greek Courts For ISP-Level Blocking
arisvega writes "At a first level (the lowest court level in the Greek judiciary system) an order has been issued (article in Greek, Google translation is fair enough) for a 'plan on behalf of Internet Service Providers regarding he implementation of technological measures to deny access to internet users for webpages through which illegal copies of copyrighted work are being distributed.' The order seems to be general and descriptive, and is a manifestation of the implementation process for an even more general and vague larger-scale EU directive, which is the common source that caused the rulings recently posted on slashdot regarding the UK, the Netherlands and Finland. This appears to be one of the reasons that prompted Anonymous to launch defacing attacks on Greek government websites some three months back."
For a country that is in economic turmoil and instituting extensive austerity measures, would it not make sense for these (presumably expensive) 'less urgent civil-type proceedings' to be dropped from the court system. Sure, the *IAA may be able to make a good case for why these rules (and court cases) are needed, but when you have many people going hungry and people setting themselves on fire on the streets, Greece has to ask itself where its priorities are.
At a first level (the lowest court level in the Greek judiciary system) an order has been issued
At the last level, you have to kill a boss and say "I'll rip your head off and shit down your neck" to win the court case.
"A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
ISP Level blocking in China or arab spring countries: BAD BAD BAD
ISP Level blocking in Europe: WE LOVE IT. ++good..
You just noticed? How quaint.
I have news for you: in pretty much every country, politicos and powers-that-be mostly care about (1) lining their pockets and (2) being reelected to carry on lining their pockets for a few more years. Oh and yes, a sizable bunch of them also get off on power and control, and seeing their own faces on TV. At any rate, precious few care about their constituents...
"A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
"The order seems to be general and descriptive, and is a manifestation of the implementation process for an even more general and vague larger-scale EU directive, which is the common source that caused the rulings recently posted on slashdot regarding the UK, the Netherlands and Finland."
Can anyone point to the larger-scale EU directive referred to in the summary? I've missed the news on any such directive having been passed. To date I was under the impression at EU level, all such directives have been in quite the opposite direction so I'd be intrigued to see where this one came from.
Idiomatic expressions like "First Base" are unfortunate for international readers. Oh, wait, I forgot we don't actually have editors. I'll retract my criticism.
I see the usual pattern of passing evil laws / precedents when the people are too busy worrying about something else (say, like food and the roof over their heads). As the economic crisis in Greece continue to unfold, expect more unjust but relatively minor (from a purely survival point of view) laws to be passed, simply because the people don't care. It's okay if you take away some of our rights so long as we get food on the dinner table
Greece is out of the Euro. Whenever so many politicians say, "We would like for Greece to stay in the Euro, but . . . ", they are really just wiggling around the truth a bit. It is similar when they say they all want peace, when the tanks are already rolling.
The whole matter is going to be rather unpleasant for all parties involved. And even for those not involved. The EU taxpayers (especially in France and Germany) will lose billions. The Greeks will need to readjust their wages to be internationally competitive again. In other words, right now they cost way more than they are worth. See "The Economist" for details on this: www.economist.com .
So leaving the Euro, will also mean repudiating international debts to fund the new Drachma. And nationalizing industries, including foreign owned ones. This has all been threaten by Alexis Tsipras, leader of the radical left Syriza party, who will probably end up leading Greece after the elections next month. The Greeks can't bear the austerity measures any more. They want the Euro, but they can't afford the cost of staying in. Unfortunately for the Greeks, they don't realize that things will be worse with the Drachma, because the government will have no money to pay them. Since the foreign banks won't lend them any more money, they will just have to print more, causing inflation, and making the currency worthless on the international market.
So what will they care about claims of piracy? Go ahead and try to collect any money from them. The simply will not be able to pay.
This is all not going to sit well with the rest of the EU. The repudiation of debts will lead to private law suits, and Greece will find itself afoul of EU laws. So a bigger danger, is if they will be able to stay in the EU itself any longer.
So this legal issue is just like "fireflies before the storm," when compared what is to come.
Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
To leave the Euro they must first leave the EU, as there is no other method for leaving the Euro.
You got yourself confused- I wont even link wikipedia because it is trivial to click a bit, read and see for yourself that the Eurozone, the Euro, and the EU are not connected the way you might think.
E.g. an area may use the Euro without being part of the Eurozone and/or the EU; a country may be part of the EU without being in the Eurozone; a country may have special trading agreements with EU countries without using the Euro OR being in the Eurozone, or without even being a member of EU; and perhaps a few other details that I don't really have the time now to check on your behalf.
A major reason why Greece won't just "leave the EU" is because it is one of the community's oldest members (1981), back from the 'veto days', where EVERY member state had veto powers. Also, "leaving the Euro" is not an option, since if this happens fingers can be pointed saying "see? It didn't work. The Euro didn't work": no technocrats upstrairs want this to happen.
The three laws of thermodynamics:(1) You can't win. (2) You can't break even. (3) You can't even quit.